Could electroplaters buy silver, copper, zinc, and similar metal cyanide salts for resale?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1956. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A chemical seller asked about silver cyanide, copper cyanide, zinc cyanide, and similar metal salts used in electroplating.
Board counsel had previously viewed the salts as manufacturing aids that conducted metal ions through the plating process. On reconsideration, the controlling fact was that ions from the salts became plated onto the finished products.
The electroplater therefore could purchase the metal salts for resale.
The same official July 17, 1956 letter also supports Annotation 440.0075 on acetone and Annotation 440.0103 on benzol, which address separate ceramic-cleaning uses.
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/440-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/440-0109.pdf
Original ruling text
440.0109
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
July 17, 1956
L. H. B--- Co.
XXth and --- Streets
--- --- X, California
Attention:
Mr. A. E. N---
Gentlemen:
We regret the delay in replying to your inquiries of January 11, April 13 and April 17, 1956, concerning the taxability of sales of Acetone and Benzol to be used in the ceramic industry. Our understanding of chemicals Acetone and Benzol is that they are acids generally used as solvents or cleaners. We have not previously ruled on either of these chemicals, but it would be our opinion that as cleaners they would be used on but not become a part of the finished product in such a way as to be exempt as provided for in Sales and Use Tax Ruling 14, copy enclosed. We would be glad to consider any further analysis you might care to submit as to the exact chemical reaction caused by these chemicals and as to the result of adding them to the products. You also inquire concerning the taxability of mineral oil sold to M--- S--- Hospital. The hospital claims that the mineral oil is used for feeding. It is our opinion that mineral oil is not a food product even though it is used for human consumption. We understand that it has not nutritional value to humans because it cannot be broken down by the digestive system. We believe that its uses for human consumption are for medicinal purposes and it is therefore taxable. Finally, you ask about silver cyanide, copper cyanide, zinc cyanide and other metal salts used in electroplating. We at one time were of the opinion that these salts were primarily manufacturing aids to conduct the metal ions from the cathode to the anode. Upon reconsidering
L. H. B--- Co.
-2-
July 17, 1956
440.0109
the question, we became of the opinion that the fact that ions in the metallic salt do become plated on the finished product should be considered controlling. The metallic salts may therefore be purchased by the plater for resale. Very truly yours,
Bill Holden
Associate Tax Counsel
JJD:tl
cc:
--- --- - Auditing
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1956. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace