Was tinting a newly purchased vehicle taxable, and was retinting a used vehicle treated the same way?

Short answer Tinting a new vehicle was taxable fabrication. Retinting used windows to their former condition was repair, so labor was nontaxable while materials followed the repair rule.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 435.1743
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1989-10-24
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
California district staff asking whether tinting new vehicle windows was taxable and retinting used vehicle windows was exempt

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1989
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization senior-tax-counsel memorandum dated October 24, 1989, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It assumes new-vehicle tinting is performed for the retail purchaser and used-vehicle retinting is performed for the owner rather than a dealer for resale; material treatment depends on value and invoicing. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding and should check current vehicle-tinting, new-property, repair, material-value, resale, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Tinting the windows of a newly purchased vehicle for the consumer was a step in producing the finished product and therefore taxable fabrication labor.

Retinting a used vehicle's windows to restore their former condition was repair. Labor charges for that retinting were nontaxable and had to be segregated.

If retinting materials were separately charged or their retail value exceeded 10 percent of the total charge, the tinter was the retailer of those materials; otherwise, the tinter was their consumer.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulations 1524(b)(3), 1526, and 1546 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum
435.1743

To:

M. Lara – San Jose District Office

From:

John Abbott
Senior Tax Counsel

Subject:

Vehicle window tinting

October 24, 1989

In your August 30, 1989 memo to me, in which the taxpayer is not named, you write: “Per your telephone conversation with M--- F--- on August 24, 1989 regarding vehicle window tinting, you said that tinting new windows is taxable while retinting windows is exempt. Since taxpayer questions this, could I please get your response in writing? Thank you.” I assume that if the taxpayer is tinting the windows of a new vehicle, he is performing the tinting for a customer who has purchased the vehicle from a new car dealer. Likewise, I assume that if the taxpayer is re-tinting the windows of a used vehicle, he is doing so for the vehicle owner, not for a dealer for resale. The application of tax to tinting a new vehicle’s windows is governed by Regulation 1526. That regulation provides that tax applies to charges for fabricating, processing, etc., tangible property for consumers who furnish the materials used in the fabricating or processing. The tinting operation is a step in the process of producing the finished product and constitutes taxable fabrication labor. See also Regulation 1524(b)(3) for a similar application of tax to charges for painting, polishing, and finishing property in connection with the production of a finished product. Regualtion 1546 governs the application of tax to retinting the windows of a used vehicle for a consumer. Since retinting restores the used vehicle’s windows to their former condition, we view this as a repair operation. If the taxpayer makes a separate charge for the materials

M. Lara

-2-

October 24, 1989
435.1743

used, or if the retail value of those materials constitutes more than 10 percent of the total charge, the taxpayer is the retailer of the materials; otherwise, he is the consumer of the materials. In either case, the taxpayer should segregate his nontaxable charges for labor in retinting the windows.

JA:jb

435.1743.doc

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1989. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace