Was supplying an operated road-base mixing machine a rental or taxable processing, and why were the protested receipts removed here?

Short answer The receipts were removed because the lessees had exclusive control. If the owner retained control over the work or operator, the same machine service would be taxable processing.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 435.1380
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1965-01-22
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A road-material and equipment business petitioning tax on operated woodmixer receipts, a used-machine sale, and delivery charges

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1965. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1965
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization associate-tax-counsel letter dated January 22, 1965, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It gives reaudit directions and makes fact-specific distinctions based on operator control, California delivery, seller nexus, contract terms, and title passage. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding and should check current equipment-rental, road-material-processing, used-property, delivery, nexus, title, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A business supplied operated woodmixer equipment used to transform raw materials into asphalt paving or cement-treated road base. The source removed the protested receipts because the leases gave the lessees the exclusive right to control the work details and manage the equipment operator.

The result would change if the owner retained any right to control the work or operator. Work performed on a subcontract or similar basis with that retained control would be taxable processing rather than the rental treatment allowed on the stated facts.

Two other audit issues received separate treatment. The intermediary's California activities in a used sand-washer transaction were only transitory, and the taxpayer's delivery to the California consumer was a retail sale under section 6007. Delivery charges on asphalt road materials were excluded because the agreement passed title before delivery.

The letter directed reaudit adjustments; it does not record later Board action.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6007 (as cited and quoted)

Source

Original ruling text

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

435.1380

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
January 22, 1965

Gentlemen:
We have reviewed your petition for redetermination of sales and use tax in light of information obtained at the preliminary hearing and the written agreements subsequently provided. The purpose of this letter is to advise you of our conclusions and directions for further action on each of the protested items. (1)

Receipts from operation of the
woodmixer equipment not reported:

$7,005

We have concluded that the entire protested amount in this classification should be deleted from the measure of tax. This is based upon acceptance of your representation that the exclusive right to control the details of the work and the right to manage and control the equipment operator was vested in the various leases. Notwithstanding the above, we shall continue to regard as taxable processing any work performed by this type of machine on a subcontract or other basis where your firm retains an element of control over the details of the work performed or the right to manage and control the equipment operator. (2)

Sale of used sand washer
machine not reported:

$3,500

We have concluded that the activities of the purchaser, "X", were transitory in nature and insufficient to warrant a finding that it was engaged in business in this state for purposes of the sales tax. Under the provisions of Section 6007 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, a retail sale includes: "The delivery in this state of tangible personal property by an owner or former owner thereof … if the delivery is to a consumer … pursuant to a retail sale made by a retailer not engaged in business in this state …." Since your firm admittedly delivered possession of the property to the consumer in this state, it is our opinion that it was properly regarded as having made a sale at retail. (3)

Delivery charges in connection
with the sale of asphalt road
materials not reported:

$10,620

Considering all of the attendant facts and circumstances, we have concluded that the proper construction of your asphalt mix sales agreement called for title to pass to the purchaser prior to delivery. Accordingly, we have directed that the delivery charges be excluded from the measure of tax. A representative of the field staff will contact you in the near future regarding the reaudit adjustments indicated above. In the interim period, if you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to correspond directly with this office. Very truly yours,

W. E. Burkett
Associate Tax Counsel
WEB:cw [lb]

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1965. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace