How were plating charges treated for consumer-owned new property, property furnished for resale, and used property being replated?

Short answer Plating new consumer property was fully taxable fabrication. Work for resale was not taxable, and replating used property was repair when it reconditioned the item.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 435.1220
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1953-06-17
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A plating business asking about nickel, chrome, and alumulite work on customer-furnished new, used, and resale property

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1953. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1953
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization assistant-counsel letter dated June 17, 1953, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It assumes plating materials were insignificant relative to the repair charge and not separately stated, and it applies historical seller-permit and resale rules. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding and should check current plating, finishing, fabrication, repair, resale, materials, permit, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Nickel, chrome, or alumulite plating of new customer-furnished property was taxable fabrication under section 6006(c) and Ruling 15, as cited. The entire charge was taxable even though the plating solution's value was small.

Plating property for a customer that would resell the finished article was not taxable because the work was not performed for a consumer.

Replating used property to repair or recondition it fell under Ruling 26. If plating and other materials were insignificant and not separately charged, the plater was treated as their consumer. The letter also instructed the business to obtain a seller's permit for its taxable fabrication activity.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6006(c) (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Rulings 15 and 26 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

435.1220

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

June 17, 1953

Mr. J. B. G--XXXX --- Boulevard
--- X, California
Dear Mr. G---:
You inquire concerning the taxability of charges for nickel, chrome and alumulite plating. You state that the plating process is applied to fittings supplied by the customer, such as faucets, top pieces, valves, automobile bumpers, hub caps, handles, grills, etc. You add that the value of the materials (plating solution, etc.) applied is insignificant in relation to the total charge. Section 6006(c) of the California Sales and Use Tax Law provides that, for sales tax purposes, a “sale” includes the fabricating or processing of tangible personal property for a consideration for consumers who furnish the materials used in the fabricating or processing. (See also Sales and Use Tax Ruling 15, copy enclosed.) We regard the plating of tangible personal property as taxable fabrication labor under section 6006(c) of the Law and Ruling 15 where the plating is performed on a new personal property furnished by a consumer. Therefore, your entire charge for such fabrication labor is subject to the tax. Where you perform the plating for persons who will resell the article plated the tax does not apply to your charges since section 6006(c) only applies where the fabrication is performed for a consumer. Where you replate used tangible personal property so as to repair or recondition such property, repair labor rather than fabrication labor is involved. The application of the tax to repair labor is governed by Ruling 26, copy enclosed. Assuming that the value of the plating materials and other materials furnished is insignificant in relation to your total charge, and further assuming that no separate charge is made for the materials, you are regarded as the consumer of such plating materials. (See the second paragraph of Ruling 26.) Our records do not indicate that you hold a seller’s permit. Since it appears that you are engaged in performing taxable fabrication labor and since such activity requires the holding of a seller’s permit, you should apply for the same at our --- district office at XXXX --- Street, telephone number Templebar 24282.

Mr. J. B. G---

-2-

June 17, 1953
435.1220

We suggest that you explain in detail the nature of your activity to a representative of that office who will then be in a position to explain to you how the tax is computed, reporting requirements, and other matters pertaining to compliance with the California Sales and Use Tax Law. Very truly yours,

W. W. Mangels
Assistant Counsel

WWM;tj
cc:

--- – Compliance

Enclosure:
Rulings 15 and 26

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1953. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace