Were a nondealer's charges taxable for painting custom murals on vehicles classified as new or used by time since first DMV registration?

Short answer No. Painting a mural was not treated as producing tangible property or as a production step, so the charge was nontaxable for both new and used vehicles.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 435.1166
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1988-11-15
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
California return-review staff asking whether a nondealer's charges for custom vehicle murals were taxable on new and used vehicles

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1988. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1988
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization assistant-chief-counsel memorandum dated November 15, 1988, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It concerns a nondealer painting murals and distinguishes that work from physical modifications to a new van; the source uses a historical 60-day DMV-registration convention for new versus used vehicles. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding and should check current mural, vehicle, custom-painting, fabrication, dealer, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A nondealer painted custom murals on vehicles the source described as new or used based on whether 60 days had passed since first DMV registration.

The charges were nontaxable for both categories. California did not regard mural painting as creating or producing tangible personal property or as a step in such production.

The memorandum distinguished painting from physical modifications to a new van, which could be part of producing tangible property.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1526(b) (as cited)
  • Sales and Use Tax Annotations 345.0060 and 435.0470 (corrected numbers stated in the source)

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

To:

Mr. Alan Giorgi
Return Review

From:

Gary J. Jugum
Assistant Chief Counsel

Subject:

Murals Painted on Vehicles

435.1166

November 15, 1988

This is in response to your memorandum of November 1, 1988. We understand that you are concerned with a taxpayer who does custom paintings (murals) on vehicles. The taxpayer is not an automobile dealer. He does murals on used vehicles (vehicles for which 60 days have passed since first being registered with DMV) and new vehicles (vehicles for which 60 days have not passed since first being registered with DMV). You are aware of Annotation 345.006 and 435.047. Annotation 345.006 states that charges for lettering signs on trucks or automobiles are nontaxable whether the vehicle is new or used. Annotation 435.047 deals with van conversions and establishes a distinction between new and used vehicles. Tax does not apply to charges made by the taxpayer for painting murals on vehicles, whether the vehicles are new or used. The annotation which applies in this case is Annotation 345.006. Painting a mural on a vehicle is not an operation which results in the creation or production of tangible personal property or a step in a process or series of operations resulting in the creation or production of tangible personal property. See Regulation 1526, paragraph (b). Where physical modifications are made to a new van, the modifications are considered to be a step in the creation or production of tangible personal property.

GJJ:sr
The annotation numbers cited above are both missing the
following zero. The correct numbers are 345.0060 and 435.0470. SUTD Annot. Coord. 4-18-06.

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1988. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace