Was a musical arranger's original manuscript taxable, and what changed when the arranger supplied multiple copies?

Short answer The original manuscript embodied a nontaxable arranging service. Preparing multiple copies was fabrication of tangible personal property, so the copies were taxable.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 435.1120
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1964-11-10
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A person asking for rulings or administrative decisions on sales tax treatment of musical arrangements

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1964. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1964
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization tax-counsel letter dated November 10, 1964, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. The counsel said the Board had issued no ruling specifically directed to musical arrangements and instead cited broader rulings and a motion-picture bulletin. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding and should check current music, manuscript, copying, digital-delivery, creative-service, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The work of a musical arranger was not taxable fabrication when the arranger's work product was embodied in a single manuscript transmitted to the buyer. The source treated that transaction as arranging services rather than a taxable sale of fabricated property.

Preparing multiple copies changed the result. The price of the copies was treated as fabrication of tangible personal property, just as printed sheet music was a sale of tangible personal property.

The Board had not issued a ruling specifically directed to musical arrangements. The letter instead enclosed Rulings 1 and 19 and Business Taxes General Bulletin 61-4, which addressed motion-picture production and stated that music arrangers' charges to producers were not taxable.

Citations and references

  • California Sales Tax Rulings 1 and 19 (as cited)
  • California Business Taxes General Bulletin 61-4 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

435.1120

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

November 10, 1964

X-------------------Dear Mr. X--------------------:
This is in reply to your letter of October 15 in which you request any pertinent rulings or administrative decisions regarding the application of the Sales and Use Tax Law to the sale of musical arrangements. You are correct in your understanding that we do not regard the services of a musical arranger as the taxable fabrication of tangible personal property insofar as his work product is embodied in a manuscript for transmittal to the person who buys the arrangement. Where multiple copies are prepared, however, the price of the copies are regarded as the fabrication of personal property rather than the sale of services. The sale of printed sheet music, for instance, is considered a sale of tangible personal property. The board has not issued any rulings particularly directed to this single area; however, we are enclosing copies of rulings 1 and 19 and Business Taxes General Bulletin 61-4. The bulletin is directed to the application of the tax to the production of motion pictures and notes that the charges of music arrangers to producers is not taxable. If you have any further question, please do not hesitate to write to us again. Very truly yours, E. H. Stetson Tax Counsel

By: Phillip R. Dougherty
PRD:spg
Enc.
Cc:

Out-of-State – District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1964. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace