Were charges taxable for mounting transparencies in cardboard, and could separately stated developing charges be excluded?

Short answer Mounting transparencies was taxable fabrication. Developing alone was nontaxable only when its charge was separately stated from the mounting work.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 435.1100
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1951-05-31
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Board staff asking about developing color transparencies and mounting them in cardboard

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1951. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1951
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization tax-counsel memorandum dated May 31, 1951, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It applies historical photographic-processing rulings and makes exclusion of developing charges depend on separate statement. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding and should check current photography, film, transparency, mounting, developing, digital-imaging, billing, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Mounting color transparencies in cardboard was taxable fabrication or processing under section 6006(c) and Ruling 15.

Ruling 23 did not tax separately stated charges for developing negatives. By analogy, developing charges connected with mounted transparencies had to be separately stated to be excluded; otherwise they remained in the taxable measure with the mounting charge.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6006(c) (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Rulings 15 and 23 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

To:

Mr. X--------------- (HHW)

From:

E. H. Stetson

Subject:

Ansco Color Transparencies

435.1100

Date:

May 31, 1951

In answer to your memo of December 28, 1950, we advise that in our opinion the operation of mounting transparencies in cardboard mounts results in a sale with respect to which the tax applies. Under Section 6006(c) and ruling 15 we believe that the mounting of the transparencies must be considered a fabrication of processing of tangible personal property. If a separate charge is made for developing only, the tax does not apply to the charge for developing pursuant to ruling 23 which provides that the tax applies to charges for printing pictures or making enlargements from negatives furnished by the customer “but not to charges for developing the negatives if such charges are separately stated”. It would appear to follow that where instead of printing or enlarging, the transparencies are mounted on cardboard, the charge for developing must be separately stated in order to be excluded from the measure of the tax.

EHS:ph

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1951. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace