Were charges taxable for mounting transparencies in cardboard, and could separately stated developing charges be excluded?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1951. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Mounting color transparencies in cardboard was taxable fabrication or processing under section 6006(c) and Ruling 15.
Ruling 23 did not tax separately stated charges for developing negatives. By analogy, developing charges connected with mounted transparencies had to be separately stated to be excluded; otherwise they remained in the taxable measure with the mounting charge.
Citations and references
- California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6006(c) (as cited)
- California Sales and Use Tax Rulings 15 and 23 (as cited)
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/435-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/435-1100.pdf
Original ruling text
State of California
Board of Equalization
Memorandum
To:
Mr. X--------------- (HHW)
From:
E. H. Stetson
Subject:
Ansco Color Transparencies
435.1100
Date:
May 31, 1951
In answer to your memo of December 28, 1950, we advise that in our opinion the operation of mounting transparencies in cardboard mounts results in a sale with respect to which the tax applies. Under Section 6006(c) and ruling 15 we believe that the mounting of the transparencies must be considered a fabrication of processing of tangible personal property. If a separate charge is made for developing only, the tax does not apply to the charge for developing pursuant to ruling 23 which provides that the tax applies to charges for printing pictures or making enlargements from negatives furnished by the customer “but not to charges for developing the negatives if such charges are separately stated”. It would appear to follow that where instead of printing or enlarging, the transparencies are mounted on cardboard, the charge for developing must be separately stated in order to be excluded from the measure of the tax.
EHS:ph
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1951. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace