Were charges for processing customer-furnished meat or game taxable, and was the paper used to wrap the finished food exempt?

Short answer The processing was a sale but exempt as food. Wrapping paper sold with the meat or game was an exempt nonreturnable container, so its purchase was also exempt.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 435.1050
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1976-05-06
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Board staff reviewing proposed guidance to the California Association of Meat Processors about wrapping paper used for customer-furnished meat

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1976. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1976
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization staff memorandum dated May 6, 1976, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It addresses processing customer-furnished meat and game for the customer's consumption and paper used as a nonreturnable delivery container. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding and should check current meat-processing, game, food-product, container, wrapping-paper, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Meat processors that carved or dressed meat supplied by customers for those customers' consumption made processing sales under section 6006(b). The sales nevertheless were exempt under section 6359 because the processed meat was a food product.

Paper used to wrap the meat for delivery was treated as a nonreturnable container sold with the food. Section 6364 therefore exempted both the processor's purchase and its sale of that paper.

The memorandum applied the same treatment to cleaning and picking ducks and other game birds brought in by customers: the processing sale was exempt as food, and the accompanying wrapping paper was an exempt container. It also said an inconsistent earlier annotation would be deleted.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6006(b), 6359, and 6364 (as cited)
  • Sales and Use Tax Annotations 435.0540 and 195.1300 (as discussed in the source)

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

To:

Mr. Robert Nunes

From:

T. P. Putnam

Subject:

Purchases of Wrapping Paper by Meat Processors

435.1050

Date:

May 6, 1976

After reviewing your proposed letter to Mr. William Andretto of the California Association of Meat Processors, I have concluded that meat processors who carve or dress meat for consumption by customers who furnish the meat are making "sales" within the meaning of Section 6006(b) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, i.e., they are processing tangible personal property for a consideration for consumers who furnish the materials used. The sale is exempt under Section 6359 as the sale of a food product. The paper used by the processor to wrap the meat should be regarded as sold along with the meat as a nonreturnable container. Accordingly, the purchase and sale of the paper is exempt under Section 6364. This conclusion appears to be consistent with Business Taxes Law Guide Anno. 435.0540, but not with Anno. 195.1300. The cleaning and picking of ducks and other game birds brought in by customers should be regarded as a processing -sale" and the paper in which they are wrapped as an exempt container, the same as in the case of the above described meat processing. This memo will be annotated and Anno. 195.1300 will be deleted.

TPP:lb
Cc:

Mr. John H. Murray
Mr. Glenn L. Rigby

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1976. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace