Were charges taxable for lacquering new film and for lacquering old film that had become scratched or worn?

Short answer Lacquering new film was taxable processing. Lacquering old scratched or worn film was nontaxable repair, though the service provider consumed the lacquer and other materials.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 435.0960
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1951-06-13
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A business asking about lacquering new film and restoring old scratched or worn film

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1951. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1951
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization tax-counsel letter dated June 13, 1951, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It distinguishes coating unused film from restoring scratched or worn used film and treats the service provider as consumer of lacquer and other repair materials. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding and should check current film, coating, preservation, repair, fabrication, material-use, digital-media, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Lacquering film that had never been used was taxable producing, fabricating, or processing under section 6006(c) and the cited Banken case.

Lacquering old film that had become scratched or otherwise worn was nontaxable repair or reconditioning. The business was the consumer of lacquer and other materials used and had to report their cost if they had been acquired tax-free for resale.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6006(c) (as cited)
  • Banken v. State Board of Equalization, 79 Cal. App. 2d 572 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

435.0960

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
June 13, 1951

Attention:

Mr. X-----------------Re:

X--------------------

Gentlemen:
Following receipt of your letter of May 11 we requested information from our Los Angeles District Office as to what forms might have been referred to by you in your letter since we were unable to locate an account for the X------------------------ from the information which you gave. Mr. X------------------- of that office has now informed us that he has communicated with you with reference to the matter and has ascertained that the forms in question were Los Angeles City forms. He also gave us further information regarding the process of your client, the taxability of which is the subject of your inquiry. Our conclusions are that charges for the lacquering of film that has never been used, in other words, new film, are subject to the tax as a producing, fabricating, or processing, pursuant to section 6006(c) of the Revenue and Taxation Code. (See in this connection Banken v. State Board of Equalization, 79 Cal. App. 2d 572.) Charges for the lacquering of old films that have been used and have become scratched or otherwise worn will be regarded as charges for repairing or reconditioning and the tax will not apply to such charges. Your client will be regarded as the consumer of the lacquer and other materials used and, assuming such material has been acquired on a tax exempt basis for resale, the cost of the lacquer or other materials should be included in the measure of the tax paid by your client. Very truly yours,

E. H. Stetson
Tax Counsel
EHS:ph

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1951. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace