Were metal heat-treatment charges taxable when billed to an intermediate fabricator rather than the consumer of the finished item?

Short answer No sale occurred when an intermediate fabricator furnished and paid for the metal. Heat treatment for the consumer was taxable unless performed solely to repair the metal.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 435.0918
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1991-03-12
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A metal heat-treatment business asking whether charges to fabricators were taxable when treated items underwent further work before delivery to the ultimate customer

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1991
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization tax-counsel letter dated March 12, 1991, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It assumes the heat treater contracts directly with an intermediate fabricator that furnishes and pays for the metal; consumer-paid treatment and treatment solely for repair receive different treatment. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding and should check current heat-treatment, subcontractor, fabrication, repair, consumer-status, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A heat-treatment business performed stress relief, annealing, normalizing, and similar work for metal fabricators. The items generally returned to the fabricator or another contractor for further processing before delivery to the refinery or other ultimate client.

Heat treatment was fabrication or processing. But California's definition treated that work as a sale only when performed for the consumer furnishing the material.

When an intermediate fabricator contracted with the heat treater, furnished the metal, and paid the charge, the work was not performed for the consumer and no taxable sale occurred. If the consumer instead paid to heat-treat consumer-furnished metal, the charge was taxable unless the treatment was solely to repair the metal.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6006(b), 6051, and 6091 (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1526 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

435.0918

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

March 12, 1991
X---------------------RE:

X---------------------Application of Sales Tax to Heat Treating Charges

Dear X-------------------,
By letter dated January 28, 1991, you requested advice from this office regarding the application of sales tax to heat treating charges. According to your letter, the facts are as follows: “1. The name of our organization is X------------------. We provide heat treating (stress relieving, annealing, normalizing, etc.) services to metal fabricators. Typically these services are part of a fabrication process that may involve welding, machining, sand blasting, pressure testing, and painting. “2. For example, X------------------ refinery in X------------------ may require repair of an existing pressure vessel or fabrication of a new vessel. The refinery would normally go to a fabricator-X------------------ Fabrication and Machine, X----------------- Fabrication, X------------------ Engineering, X------------------ Pipe, etc. – to have this item manufactured or reworked. The fabricator would then, in turn, at the appropriate point in the fabrication process, come to us for whatever heat treating requirement that might be involved in the fabrication process, depending on the type of metal, type of service, etc. “3. After we perform our function, the item will then, typically, go back to the fabricator or to another second-level contractor for further processing (sand blasting, painting, testing, etc.) prior to delivery to the client--In this case X--------.” You state that it is your assumption that your services are not taxable and that taxes due will be obtained by your client upon delivery of the finished product to X------. You ask whether this assumption is correct. Revenue and Taxation Code section 6051 imposes a sales tax upon all retailers measured by gross receipts upon the retail sale of tangible personal property in this state. All gross receipts from retail sales are presumed to be taxable until the contrary is established. Rev. & Tax. Code § 6091.

The important issue here is whether you are making a sale when you charge a fabricator for heat treating the metal it furnishes you. The definition of a sale under Revenue and Taxation Code section 6006(b) includes: “The producing, fabricating, processing, printing, or imprinting of tangible personal property for a consideration for consumers who furnish either directly or indirectly the materials used In the producing, fabricating, processing, processing, or imprinting.” (Emphasis added.) In our opinion heat treating is fabricating or processing within the meaning of the law. We assume, however, that you contract directly with the fabricator who furnishes you with the metal to be treated and that the fabricator pays you for heat treating the metal. In that case, you are not heat treating the metal for the consumer. Therefore, there is no sale, and no sales tax is imposed on the amount you charge the fabricator. If, however, a consumer such as X------------ pays you to heat treat metal that it furnishes you, then there is a retail sale on which you must pay sales tax unless the heat treatment is solely for the purpose of repairing the metal. We are enclosing a copy of Regulation 1526, entitled “Producing, Fabricating and Processing Property Furnished by Consumers – General Rules.” If you need further assistance on this matter, please write to us again. Sincerely,

Elizabeth Abreu
Tax Counsel
EA:cs/0137E
Enclosures:
Bc:

Regulation 1526

San Francisco District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1991. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace