Were charges for folding customer-furnished wiping cloths taxable processing or nontaxable service labor?

Short answer They were taxable. The Board treated folding the cloths into final form for a consumer as a processing sale under section 6006(b).
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 435.0874
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1983-07-15
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A project petitioning a sales-tax assessment on charges for folding customer-furnished wiping cloths

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1983. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1983
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization assistant-chief-counsel letter dated July 15, 1983, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It reports the Board's final determination on the described petition, including deletion of a filing penalty, but concerns that project and its customer-furnished wiping-cloth work. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding and should check current textile, folding, customer-furnished-material, processing, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Board denied a petition challenging sales tax on charges for folding wiping cloths and ordered redetermination without an adjustment to the tax. It separately deleted the penalty for failure to file returns.

Folding was not treated as a nontaxable service. The Board concluded that folding the customer-furnished cloths was a step in producing tangible personal property in its final form, making the charge taxable under Revenue and Taxation Code section 6006(b) and Regulation 1526.

The project was the retailer legally liable for the tax. Whether its customer had a contractual duty to reimburse the project was a separate matter between those parties; the letter only suggested that the customer might voluntarily reimburse it.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6006(b) (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1526 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

435.0874

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
916-445-3723

July 15, 1983
X----------------------

Dear X--------------------,
This is in regard to the petition for redetermination of sales tax filed by our office in regard to the X----------------------. This matter was heard by the Board in Sacramento on June 22, 1983. On June 22, the Board denied your petition for redetermination and ordered that the tax be redetermined without adjustment. The penalty for failure to file returns was deleted. The Board has concluded that charges made by the X---------------------- for folding wiping cloths constituted gross receipts from the retail sale of tangible personal property, in accordance with Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6006(b). That section provides that the term “sale” includes “The producing, fabricating, processing, printing, or imprinting of tangible personal property for a consideration for consumers who furnish either directly or indirectly the materials used in the producing, fabricating, processing, printing, or imprinting.” In accordance with its prior interpretations, the Board is of the view that folding wiping cloths constitutes a step in the production of tangible personal property into its final form and is taxable when done for a consumer. See our Regulation 1526, copy enclosed for your reference. You will be receiving a notice of redetermination in the reasonably near future. On June 22 individual members of the Board suggested that your customer might be willing to reimburse the project for sales tax assessed against your agency. Since it is clear that the tax applies and since the Board has made its final determination that the tax was properly assessed, we were asked by the Board to assist you in communicating this information to your customer. While by law the tax is legally imposed upon the project as the retailer, the question as to the responsibility of the customer to reimburse the project is a matter of contract between the parties. In view of the socially beneficial nature of the activities conducted by the project and in view of the fact that the customer in question has been supportive of this activity, it is possible that it may agree to reimburse the project for the tax costs incurred.

If we could be of assistance in this matter, please feel free to contact the undersign directly by telephone or letter at the number or address listed above. Very truly yours,

Gary J. Jugum
Assistant Chief Counsel
J:alicetilton
Enclosure
Bc:

San Jose – District Administrator
Petitions Unit
Mr. H. L. Cohen

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1983. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace