When did resizing or combining rugs become taxable fabrication, and how were cleaning, edging, and fringe charges treated?

Short answer Reducing one rug's size was not fabrication, but making two rugs from one or one from two was taxable. Related cleaning, edging, and fringe work followed the main job's classification.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 435.0180
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1953-06-02
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A rug business asking about reducing, combining, splitting, cleaning, edging, and changing fringe on customer rugs

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1953. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1953
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization junior-counsel letter dated June 2, 1953, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It distinguishes restoration or minor alteration of used rugs from substantial changes in form and makes related service charges follow the principal work. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding and should check current rug, carpet, cleaning, edging, fringe, fabrication, repair, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Merely reducing a rug's size was not taxable fabrication. Making two rugs from one or combining two rugs into one substantially changed the property and was taxable fabrication under Ruling 15, as cited.

Cleaning, finishing raw edges, and removing or adding fringe followed the classification of the main work. Those charges were taxable when connected with fabrication but nontaxable when connected only with repair or reconditioning.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Ruling 15 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

435.0180

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
June 2, 1953

Gentlemen:
You inquire concerning the application of sales tax to your activities in connection with altering and repairing rugs. As indicated in Sales and Use Tax Ruling 15 (copy enclosed) charges for producing, fabricating, or processing tangible personal property for consumers who furnish the materials used are subject to sales tax. In the case of used articles, it has been our interpretation that merely cleaning, reconditioning, repairing, or restoring the property to its original condition is not taxable fabrication. If, however, the property is substantially changed in form, the work is taxable fabrication and all charges in connection therewith are taxable. Merely reducing the size of a rug is not taxable fabrication. But making two rugs out of one or one rug out of two is taxable fabrication. When your charges for fabrication are taxable, your charges for cleaning, finishing raw edges, and removing or adding fringe are also taxable. But charges for cleaning, finishing edges, or removing or adding fringe in connection with repair or reconditioning work are not subject to sales tax. Yours very truly,

Bill Holden
Junior Counsel
BH: ja
cc: Pasadena - Auditing

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1953. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace