Were semiconductor carrier tapes and reels exempt containers or merely incidental to a service when used to feed chips into assembly machines?

Short answer No. The tapes and reels were taxable tangible manufacturing aids, not exempt nonreturnable containers, and chip placement and inspection were incidental to their sale.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 435.0150
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1994-01-21
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
California auditing staff asking how tax applied to carrier tapes and reels used to place semiconductor chips into assembly machines

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1994. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1994
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization staff-counsel memorandum dated January 21, 1994, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. Its conclusion depends on carrier tapes and reels being consumed as manufacturing aids, not resold with the chips, and on the customer's true object being that property rather than inspection services. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding and should check current semiconductor, manufacturing-aid, container, true-object, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A processor placed customer-furnished semiconductor chips into recesses in carrier tape, covered the tape with film, wound it onto reels, and offered varying levels of chip inspection. The customer's assembly machine then removed the chips from the tape and placed them on circuit boards; the empty tapes and reels were discarded.

The nonreturnable-container exemption did not apply. The processor did not sell the tapes and reels empty, and the purchaser did not resell them together with their contents. Instead, the manufacturer used and discarded them.

Under the true-object analysis, the customer purchased tangible tapes and reels to protect the chips and feed them into the assembly machine. They were taxable manufacturing aids rather than property transferred incidentally to an exempt service. Chip placement and inspection were incidental to that sale.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6364 (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulations 1501, 1525(a), and 1526(b) (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization
Telephone: 324-2608

Memorandum

Legal Division MIC: 85

435.0150
To

Mr. Norman Jung
San Jose Auditing (GH)

:

From :

Rachel Aragon
Staff Counsel

Subject:

R--- W. C---

Date:

January 21, 1994

SR -- XX-XXXXXX

This is in reply to your memorandum dated December 10, 1993, in which you ask how tax applies to the purchase and sale of tapes and reels. You state: “The above taxpayer provides processing services and specializes in surface mount device tape and reeling. Surface mount device tape and reel service involves placing customer provided semiconductor chips onto a special carrier tape. The carrier tapes contain recesses where the chips are placed. A clear film is then placed over the carrier tape to prevent the chips from falling out. The filled carrier tape is then rolled up on a reel. The reel containing the filled carrier tape is then packaged and shipped to the customer or their agent (subcontractor). “The customer or the subcontractor would then load the reel onto an assembly machine. The carrier tape from the reel is fed into the assembly machine similar to a machine gun belt. The assembly machine would remove the chips from the tape and stamp the chips onto circuit boards. The carrier tape is emptied and discarded by the customer. The reel is also discarded when it becomes empty. Semiconductor chips are expensive sensitive devices. As such, they cannot be loaded onto an assembly machine by simply dumping the chips into a hopper. The carrier tape and reel enables the chips to be loaded into the assembly machine without the possibility of physical damage. The assembly machines are designed to accept these semiconductor chips via the tape and reel system. Without the tape and reel system, the semiconductor chips cannot be loaded into the assembly machine.

Mr. Norman Jung
San Jose Auditing (GH)

-2-

January 21, 1994

R--- W. C--SR -- XX-XXXXXX

435.0150

“The taxpayer will include the taping service, various levels of inspection of the semiconductor chips. The fee for the tape and reel service varies with the level of the inspection service chosen by the customer. “All tapes and reels are purchased by the taxpayer ex-tax (for resale). “The taxpayer believes that he is providing an exempt service.” You note that an argument might be made that the reels and tapes qualify as nonreturnable containers. The exemption relevant to this question is found in Revenue and Taxation Code section 6364 which states in part: “There are exempted from the taxes imposed by this part, the gross receipts from sales of and the storage, use, or other consumption in this State of: “(a) Nonreturnable containers when sold without the contents to persons who place the contents in the container and sell the contents together with the contents.” This provision is not applicable because the taxpayer does not sell the property without contents, nor does the purchaser resell the property together with the contents. Rather, the property is used and then discarded by the manufacturer. Your next question is whether the taxpayer is providing tangible personal property to its customers or transferring tangible personal property incidental to a service. The basic distinction in determining whether a particular transaction involves a sale of tangible personal property or the transfer of tangible personal property incidental to the performance of a service is one of the true object of the contract; that is, is the real object sought by the buyer the service per se or the property produced by the service. (Reg. 1501.) Here, the tapes are put on an assembly line where they are fed onto the circuit boards. It seems evident that the manufacturer is purchasing the tapes and reels which are used in the manufacturing process to keep the chips from being damaged. It is our opinion the taxpayer is selling tangible personal property (the reels and tapes) to be used as manufacturing aids and that any services provided, such as chip placement and inspection, are incidental to that sale.

Mr. Norman Jung
San Jose Auditing (GH)

-3-

R--- W. C--SR -- XX-XXXXXX

January 21, 1994

435.0150

This analysis is confirmed by subdivision (a) of Regulation 1525, which states that tax applies to the sale of tangible personal property if the tangible personal property is purchased for use in manufacturing, producing, or processing tangible personal property and not for the purpose of physically incorporating it into the property. (Accord Reg. 1526(b).) As discussed herein, the tapes and reels are used as manufacturing aids, and their sale is therefore taxable. If we can be of further assistance please feel free to write again.

RA:jlh

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1994. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace