Were dealer-branded catalogs exempt when an office-products wholesaler ordered them, sold them to independent dealers, and had out-of-state printers ship directly to dealer customers?

Short answer The printed-message exemption failed because the wholesaler, not the purchasing dealers, specially ordered the materials. Direct out-of-state shipment to customers still produced no California sales or use tax.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 432.0760
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1990-05-17
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
An out-of-state office-products wholesaler (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1990. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1990
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a May 17, 1990 California State Board of Equalization senior-tax-counsel opinion issued to an out-of-state wholesaler and published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It separates a failed special-order exemption from a favorable out-of-state title-and-use analysis. Current drop-shipment, title-passage, dealer, use-tax, and printed-message rules should be checked. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An Illinois office-products wholesaler ordered catalogs and fliers from out-of-state printers. The materials advertised the wholesaler's products and carried independent dealers' names and designs. The wholesaler treated the dealers as purchasers and sold them the materials.

California denied the printed-sales-message exemption because the wrong party placed the special order. Regulation 1541.5 defined special-order printing as design and preparation according to the purchaser's specific request. The wholesaler, not the purchasing dealers, had specially ordered the catalogs and fliers.

The direct-to-customer shipments still were not taxable on the stated facts. California sales tax did not apply because the sale occurred outside the state. When the out-of-state printer shipped directly to dealer customers in California at no cost, the dealer's donation and use were complete when title passed outside California, so the dealers had no California use-tax liability either.

What this means for you

Wholesalers, dealer networks, printers, and tax professionals

Identify the statutory purchaser and the party whose specific request controls the design. Even when a printed-message exemption fails, separately analyze where the sale occurs, when title passes, and where the purchaser completes its use.

Common questions

Q: Did dealer names and designs make the materials specially ordered by the dealers?

A: No. The opinion relied on the wholesaler having placed the special order with the printers.

Q: Did California sales tax apply to the direct shipments?

A: No. The sale occurred outside California.

Q: Did the dealers owe use tax when the printers shipped directly to their customers?

A: No. The opinion treated their donation and use as complete when title passed outside California.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code §§ 6051, 6201, 6203, and 6204
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code § 6379.5
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1541.5(a)(2) and (b)
  • Sales and Use Tax Annotation 280.0360 (cited in the source)

Source

Original ruling text

432.0760

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

WILLIAM M. BENNETT
First District, Kentfield

1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(PO BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
TELEPHONE (916) 324 - 3828

CONWAY H. COLLIS
Second District, Los Angeles
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR
Third District, San Diego
PAUL CARPENTER
Fourth District, Los Angeles
GRAY DAVIS
Controller, Sacramento

May 17, 1990

CINDY RAMBO
Executive Director

Dear Mr. X----------------------,
This is in reply to your April 3, 1990 letter to Tax Counsel David Levine regarding the application of California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6379.5 to X-------------------’s activities in California. You provided the following facts: “The taxpayer, X-------------------, is an Illinois corporation registered and qualified to do business in the State of California. “X------------- is a national wholesaler of office products and supplies. Each year X-------- contracts with several printing firms to produce advertising materials (catalogs and fliers) for its dealers. Said dealers are not agents of X--------- but are independent retailers. These advertising materials display and describe the various products which a consumer can purchase from X--------- dealers. Both the catalogs and the fliers are produced for the dealers and imprinted with the dealer’s own name and design on the cover. “All of the advertising materials are printed for X--------- in either Arkansas, Wisconsin or Georgia, by an outside printing firm, and are shipped directly from the printer by common carrier to either the dealer or the dealer’s customer. Advertising materials which are shipped directly to the dealer by the printer are distributed by the dealer to the end user customer free of charge. Likewise, advertising materials which are shipped to the dealer’s customer are shipped free of charge. “In all cases, X--------- considers its dealers as the purchaser of the advertising materials and charges its dealers its selling price of the materials plus sales tax.” Given this information, you asked whether sales tax applies to the charges by X--------for the advertising materials in those situations where the advertising materials are shipped directly from the printer to the dealer’s customers. Since the sale of the property occurs out of state, the California sales tax would not be applicable. (Cf. Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051.) Rather, if the transaction were subject to tax, the applicable tax would be the California use tax which is imposed upon the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6201.) A retailer engaged in business in this state and making sales of tangible personal property for storage, use or other consumption in

this state is required to collect the tax from the purchaser and report and pay it to this Board. (Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6203, 6204.) As you know, section 6379.5 provides: “There are exempted from the taxes imposed by this part the gross receipts from the sale of, and the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of catalogs, letters, circulars, brochures, and pamphlets consisting substantially of printed sales messages for goods and services printed to the special order of the purchaser and mailed or delivered by the seller, the seller’s agent, or a mailing house, acting as the agent for the purchaser, through the United States Postal Service or by common carrier to any other person at no cost to that person who becomes the owner thereof.” Enclosed is a copy of Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1541.5, Printed Sales Messages, which provides the Board’s interpretation of section 6379.5. Subdivision (a)(2) of the regulation defines the term “printed to the special order” to mean “designed and prepared according to the specific request of the purchaser”. We understand that, during a telephone conversation with MR. Levine, you stated that the advertising materials are printed to the special order of X-------rather than to the order of the dealers. In such case, we believe that the advertising materials were not “printed to the special order of the purchaser” as required in subdivision (b) of the regulation, and your sale of the catalogs and fliers to dealers does not qualify for exemption under section 6379.5. As noted above, however, the California use tax is imposed upon the use of tangible personal property purchased for use in this state. Under the facts you provide, the dealer’s use of the catalogs and fliers is the donation of the products to its customers. When the dealers have the printers ship the catalogs and fliers directly from an out-of-state location to the dealer’s customers in California, the dealer’s use of the property is complete at the time title passes to the property out of state, and the dealers are not liable for use tax. (See Bus. Taxes Law Guide Annot. 280.0360.) In summary, when X------------- sells catalogs and fliers to its California dealers and the property is shipped directly from the out-of-state printer to the dealer’s customers in California at no cost to the dealer’s customers, X--------- sale of the tangible personal property is neither subject to California sales nor use tax. We hope this answers your question; however, if you need further information, feel free to write again. Very truly yours,

Ronald L. Dick
Senior Tax Counsel
RLD:sr
Enc.

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1990. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace