Were insurance-program inserts sent to a bank for inclusion with credit-card statements exempt printed sales messages?

Short answer Conditionally yes. The inserts qualified by content, and the bank could be the insurer's mailing-house agent only if the mailing contract was arm's length and paid true compensation.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 432.0072.001
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1991-05-09
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A printer of insurance-program statement inserts (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1991
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a May 9, 1991 California State Board of Equalization senior-tax-counsel opinion issued to a printer and published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. The exemption depended on the insurer's contract with the bank being an arm's-length transaction providing true compensation for mailing the inserts. Current mailing-house, agency, compensation, and printed-message rules should be checked. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A printer made 3½-by-7½-inch envelope inserts advertising an insurance program to holders of a bank's credit cards. The printer sent the inserts directly to the bank's card centers, which placed them in envelopes with monthly credit-card statements.

California said the inserts clearly qualified by content as specially ordered circulars consisting substantially of printed sales messages for services. The remaining issue was whether delivery to the bank satisfied the mailing requirement.

Regulation 1541.5(a)(3) defined a mailing house as a person compensated for stamping, addressing, sealing, or otherwise preparing property for mailing. The bank could serve as the insurer's mailing-house agent only if its mailing arrangement was an arm's-length transaction and the insurer provided true compensation for mailing the circulars.

If that condition was met, the printer's sale of the inserts was exempt.

What this means for you

Financial institutions, insurers, printers, and tax professionals

A business that already sends customer statements can potentially act as a mailing house for another purchaser's insert. Document a genuine agency arrangement, actual mailing work, and arm's-length compensation rather than relying on the bank's existing relationship with the recipients.

Common questions

Q: Did the inserts qualify as promotional content?

A: Yes. The opinion said they were circulars consisting substantially of printed sales messages for services.

Q: Was delivery to the bank automatically sufficient?

A: No. The bank had to qualify as a mailing house acting for the insurer.

Q: What compensation was required?

A: The opinion required an arm's-length contract providing true compensation to the bank for mailing the circulars.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code § 6379.5
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1541.5(a)(3)

Source

Original ruling text

432.0072.001

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
(916) 445-6450

May 9, 1991

Mr. M--- J--A--- L---, Inc.
XXXXX --- -----, CA XXXXX-XXXX
SY -- XX-XXXXXX
Dear Mr. J---:
This is in reply to your February 27, 1991 letter to the --- District Office of the State Board of Equalization. Your letter asks for the application of sales tax to your charges for cards which you sell to C--- S--- and O--- N--- Insurance Company. The cards are 3 ½” x 7 ½” envelope inserts which advertise an insurance program for holders of credit cards issued by [Bank]. You print the inserts and send them directly to two [Bank] card centers which send them to the cardholders in the envelope containing the credit card statements. The applicable exemption from the sales tax is provided by Revenue and Taxation Code section 6379.5, which provides: “There are exempted from the taxes imposed by this part the gross receipts from the sale of, and the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of catalogs, letters, circulars, brochures, and pamphlets consisting substantially of printed sales messages for goods and services printed to the special order of the purchaser, and mailed or delivered by the seller, the seller’s agent, or a mailing house, acting as the agent for the purchaser, through the United States Postal Service or by common carrier to any other person at no cost to that person who becomes the owner thereof.” It is clear that the cards qualify as “circulars…consisting substantially of printed sales messages for goods and services printed to the special order of the purchaser.” The remaining issue is whether the circulars are mailed or delivered in accordance with the statute.

Mr. M--- J---

-2-

May 9, 1991
432.0072.001

Since you ship the circulars to [Bank], your sale will qualify for exemption if [Bank] is a “mailing hours, acting as an agent for the purchaser.” Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1541.5, Printed Sales Messages, defines “mailing house” at subdivision (a)(3) to mean any person engaged in the business of stamping, addressing, sealing or otherwise preparing property for mailing for compensation. During our telephone conversation, you noted that you believe that C--- S--­ compensates [Bank] for mailing the cards. We believe that C--- S---’ contract with [Bank] for the mailing must be an arm’s length transaction whereby C--- S--- provides a true compensation to
[Bank] for mailing the circulars. If such is the case, we believe that, for purposes of section 6379.5,
[Bank] is a mailing house, acting as the agent for C--- S---, and your sale of the printed sales messages would be exempt from sales tax. We hope this answers your question; however, if you need further information, feel free to write again. Very truly yours,

Ronald L. Dick
Senior Tax Counsel

RLD:sr

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1991. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace