Did HMO directories listing participating physicians, addresses, and practice areas qualify as printed sales messages when mailed to prospects or members?

Short answer No. California treated the directories as informational listings rather than principally promotional messages, regardless of whether recipients were prospective or existing members.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 432.0064.450
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1995-07-11
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
The Board's Torrance District staff

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1995. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1995
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a July 11, 1995 California State Board of Equalization Staff Counsel memorandum published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. Counsel did not receive the provider-directory samples and relied on the described physician names, addresses, and practice areas and a substantially similar prior annotation. Another HMO or printer should check the actual directory's current content and purpose. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An HMO printer sold directories listing participating physicians, office addresses, and practice areas. The district asked whether mailing them to prospective enrollees, who needed to select a physician, changed their treatment from copies sent to existing members.

California treated medical-provider directories as informational listings, not publications principally advertising or promoting goods or services. Their retail sales therefore did not qualify under section 6379.5.

The result was the same whether recipients were prospective or existing HMO members. Counsel noted, however, that no directory sample had been provided.

What this means for you

HMOs, directory printers, and tax professionals

Analyze the directory's actual content rather than its audience alone. A functional list of providers does not become principally promotional merely because a prospect uses it while choosing enrollment options.

Common questions

Q: Were provider directories printed sales messages?

A: No, under the described facts.

Q: Did mailing to prospects change the answer?

A: No.

Q: Did counsel review the actual directories?

A: No, so the opinion relied on the description and similar prior facts.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code §§ 6051 and 6379.5
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1541.5(a)(1)
  • Business Taxes Law Guide Annotation 432.0030

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

To:

X------------------Torrance District – AB

From:

Kelly W. Ching
Staff Counsel

Subject:

X------------------------------

432.0064.450

Date:

July 11, 1995

This is in response to your memorandum received by us on April 4, 1995 regarding BTLG Annotation 432.0030, which concerns whether directories qualify as printed sales messages. You state: “Please provide me the background on [the] above annotation. I have a situation wherein medical provider directories were mailed directly to potential enrollees, since they have to select an IPA and primary care physician and indicate them in the enrollment card. “Enclosed are some letters from X-------------- (taxpayer) and X------------- HMO (TP’s customer), and also [a] copy of the enrollment card. “Are these medical provider directories always taxable whether they are mailed to potential members or mailed to existing members?” It appears that your inquiry relates to directories that list the names of physicians and provide certain information about the physicians, such as their office addresses and areas of practice. I note that while you enclosed copies of what appear to be a X---------- HMO rate sheet and a HMO enrollment card, you have not enclosed any copies of directories listing HMO participating providers. In your inquiry, it appears that you raise a question as to whether such directories, even if not considered printed sales messages when mailed to existing members, would be considered printed sales messages when mailed to potential members for the purpose of encouraging them to enroll in the HMO contracting with the listed physicians. As you know, a retailer owes sales tax on its retail sales of tangible personal property in California, measured by gross receipts, unless specifically exempt by statute. (Rev. & Tax. Code
§ 6051.) The information you have provided indicates that TP sells the directories to HMO at

retail; therefore TP owes sales tax on its sales to HMO unless those sales are exempt from tax by statute. The exemption for certain sales of printed sales messages is set forth in Revenue and Taxation Code section 6379.5, which provides: “Printed sales messages for goods and services printed to the special order of the purchaser. There are exempted from the taxes imposed by this part the gross receipts from the sale of, and the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of catalogs, letters, circulars, brochures, and pamphlets consisting substantially of printed sales messages for goods and services printed to the special order of the purchaser and mailed or delivered by the seller, the seller's agent, or a mailing house, acting as the agent for the purchaser, through the United States Postal Service or by common carrier to any other person at no cost to that person who becomes the owner thereof.” Regulation 1541.5 explains that the term "printed sales message" does not include directories unless they meet the principal purpose of advertising or promoting goods or services. BTLG Annotation 432.0030 considered facts almost identical to those described in your' memorandum and its accompanying documents. In the situation that resulted in the annotation, we concluded that directories listing the medical service providers of an HMO constitute informational listings which do not advertise or promote the sale of goods or services. That is, directories listing medical service providers do not consist substantially of messages printed for the principal purpose of advertising or promoting goods or services; therefore, they are not considered printed sales messages as defined in subdivision (a) (1) of Regulation 1541.5. This means that sales of the medical service provider directories are not exempt from tax under section 6379.5, without regard to whether the directories are mailed to potential members or to existing members of the HMO.

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1995. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace