Did letters and envelopes printed principally to solicit donations qualify for California's printed-sales-message exemption?

Short answer No. The Board withdrew its earlier favorable advice because the materials principally solicited donations rather than advertised or promoted goods or services.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 432.0063.800
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1989-03-17
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A graphics and printing business (identity partially redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1989
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a March 17, 1989 California State Board of Equalization senior-tax-counsel correction sent to a graphics and printing business and published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It expressly withdraws favorable advice issued October 5, 1988 for the same materials and directs the printer to disregard that advice in future similar dealings. Different content or current law may change the result. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Board had previously told a printer that its sales of letters and envelopes to a community-services customer were exempt under section 6379.5.

After reviewing the original samples again, the Board said that advice was wrong. The letters and envelopes principally solicited donations rather than advertised or promoted goods or services, so they did not qualify for the printed-sales-message exemption.

The correction directed the printer to disregard the October 5, 1988 advice in all future transactions with that customer and others in similar circumstances.

What this means for you

Nonprofits, fundraising printers, direct-mail businesses, and tax professionals

The principal purpose controls. A letter-and-envelope package does not qualify merely because it is mailed broadly or contains persuasive language; fundraising solicitations are different from advertising goods or services.

Common questions

Q: Did the letters and envelopes qualify?

A: No. Their principal purpose was soliciting donations.

Q: Had the Board previously reached the opposite result?

A: Yes. This letter expressly called the earlier advice erroneous and withdrew it for future dealings.

Q: Does the holding cover materials that principally sell goods or services?

A: No. The correction was based on the submitted materials' donation-solicitation purpose.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code § 6379.5

Source

Original ruling text

432.0063.800

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 445-8485

March 17, 1989

K--- Z--G--- Graphics & Printing
P.O. Box XXX
---, CA XXXXX
Re:

SR -- XX-XXXXXX

Dear K--- Z---:
On October 5, 1988, we wrote you expressing our opinion that G--- Graphics & Printing’s sales of letters and envelopes to R--- Community Services were exempt pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6379.5. Since writing to you, it has come to our attention that the advice given you was erroneous. Upon further review of the materials attached to you original request for opinion of August 9, 1988, we have concluded that the principal purpose of the letters and envelopes in question was to solicit donations, not to advertise or promote goods or services. Our position in this area has consistently been that sales of such materials do not qualify for the section 6379.5 exemption. Accordingly, kindly disregard our prior advice in all future dealings with this customer and others similarly situated. Very truly yours,

E. L. Sorensen, Jr.
Senior Tax Counsel

ELS:jb
cc:

Audit Evaluation and Planning Unit (GEL)

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1989. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace