Was a political-campaign consultant merely its client's purchasing agent, and were campaign brochures exempt printed sales messages?

Short answer No. Markups and nonseparate billing defeated agent treatment, campaign literature was excluded from printed-message exemption, and brochures and artwork were taxable retail sales.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 432.0020
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1992-04-15
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Counsel for a political-campaign consulting company (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1992
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an April 15, 1992 California State Board of Equalization senior-tax-counsel opinion issued about a political-campaign consulting company and published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. The result depended on contract language, supplier disclosure, written agency evidence, markup, invoicing, transfer of artwork, and the campaign nature of the brochures. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A political-campaign company provided consulting and planning, arranged printing, and created some artwork. Candidate contracts called the company an agent for brochure purchases, but the company marked up brochure costs and did not separately show exact supplier reimbursement on its invoices.

California concluded that the company failed Regulation 1540's purchasing-agent procedure. True agent treatment required advance written evidence, disclosure of the client to the supplier, and billing the client the same property price paid to the supplier, separately from the agency fee. Markup and nonseparate invoicing meant the company bought and then made taxable retail sales of brochures and artwork.

The consulting-service focus did not make custom artwork and brochures incidental supplies. They had independent value as tangible personal property. Campaign literature also was specifically excluded from the printed-sales-message definition, so that exemption did not protect the brochures.

When the company made retail sales, it should report tax on those sales and issue resale certificates for qualifying inputs rather than pay tax reimbursement to vendors. Artwork not sold to the client before use, and not incorporated into property sold, remained taxable to the company.

What this means for you

Political consultants, campaign firms, artists, and tax professionals

Calling a firm an agent is not enough. Match supplier disclosure, written authority, exact pass-through pricing, and separate invoicing to the regulation, and treat campaign literature and custom artwork as separate taxable-property questions.

Common questions

Q: Why did agency treatment fail?

A: The company marked up brochure costs and did not separately invoice the exact supplier reimbursement.

Q: Were campaign brochures exempt printed sales messages?

A: No. Regulation 1541.5 specifically excluded campaign literature.

Q: Did the consulting contract make artwork incidental and nontaxable?

A: No. The opinion treated custom artwork and brochures as valuable tangible personal property.

Q: Could the company buy printing materials for resale?

A: Only to the extent the property was sold to the client before use or became an ingredient or component of property sold.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulations 1501, 1540(a)(2)(A) and (d), and 1541.5(a)(1)

Source

Original ruling text

432.0020

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 445-6450

April 15, 1992
REDACTED TEXT

Dear REDACTED TEXT:
This is in reply to your March 2, 1992 letter regarding the application of sales tax to charges by your client under the following facts you provided: “A local company is in the business of handling political campaigns for candidates and issues in California election contests. The company provides consulting and planning services in setting up the campaign and deals with printers in the procurement of brochures and mailing pieces. The company employs an artist who prepares preliminary art, some final mechanical art, and some computer design that is used in the production of brochures. “The candidate signs a contract indicating that the company is an agent in the purchase of brochures and other materials. Sales tax is charged to the company by printers and other vendors on all outside purchase except those that qualify as printed sales messages handled through mailing houses. The company makes no purchases for resale. “When brochures are finished, the company bills the candidate for the brochures separately from other consulting services, but does not usually specify on the invoice the exact printer’s charges nor does it routinely show the markup separately. There can be some variation in the actual markup percentage but this is not apparent from the invoice which the candidate receives. “The great bulk of the company’s income is from charges for consulting and planning services. The true object of the contract is the performance of consultant services leading to the successful election of the candidate. The value of the simple artwork done by the in-house artist is minimal--perhaps
$100 per project, and an entire contract for campaign management can easily run $30-50,000. Elaborate productions are handled by outside suppliers of art and mechanicals, and sales tax is charged by the suppliers.

REDACTED TEXT

-2-

April 15, 1992
432.0020

“Other direct-mail-product-only accounts make up a smaller portion of this business. The company provides creative concept, copywriting, and graphic design with in-house staff. They then oversee and supervise print production and mailhouse services, and bill the client as described above. The company understands such ‘printed sales messages’ to be exempt from tax. You note that the company “signs a contract indicating that the company is an agent in the purchase of brochures and other materials.” Apparently, the company wishes to avail itself of the procedure provided in Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1540, Advertising Agencies, Commercial Artists and Designers, at subdivision (a)(2)(A), to act as an agent for the client. To do so, the company must satisfy all the requirements in the subdivision whether or not the company is an advertising agency. The subdivision provides that: “(I) the agency must clearly disclose to the supplier the name of the client for whom the agency is acting as agent, “(II) the agency must obtain, prior to the acquisition, and retain written evidence of agent status with the client, and “(III) the price billed to the client, exclusive of any agency fee, must be the same as the amount paid to the supplier.” The subdivision goes on to provide that the reimbursement for the property should be separately invoiced, or shown separately on an invoice, to the client. Since you note that the company both marks up the cost of the brochures and does not separately invoice the reimbursement for purchasing the property, the company does not acquire the brochures as an agent on behalf of the candidate. Rather, the company makes a taxable retail sale of the brochures and artwork to the client. Further, even were the company to purchase the printing of the brochures and other materials as an agent on behalf of the client, the company’s sales of artwork are subject to tax. You note that the value of the artwork is minimal, but you did not provide the basis for your conclusion as to that value. Your comment that the true object of the contract is the performance of consulting services suggests that you believe that the brochures or artwork are consumed by the company rather than sold. If so, we disagree. We do not believe that the company’s providing artwork or brochures is akin to an accounting firm or tax service furnishing forms or binders to its clients as an incident to the rendition of its services. Rather, the artwork or brochures are custom made properties and have value as items of tangible personal property. The retail sale of the tangible personal property is subject to sales tax. (Cf. Sales and Use Tax Reg. 1501, Service Enterprises Generally). You note that the company understands that its sales of the brochures are exempt sales of printed sales messages. Enclosed is a copy of Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1541.5, Printed Sales

REDACTED TEXT

-3-

April 15, 1992
432.0020

Messages. The term “printed sales message” is defined at subdivision (a)(1) and specifically excludes “campaign literature and other fund-raising materials.” Where the company makes retail sales of brochures and artwork, the company should not pay sales tax reimbursement to its vendors for the paper, ink, and printing charges. Rather, the company should report and pay sales tax on its retail sales and issue resale certificates to its vendors where appropriate. Of course, if the company merely contracts to sell brochures to its client, and does not sell the artwork to its client prior to use, tax applies to the retail sale of the artwork to the company. The company may only purchase for resale that tangible personal property which is sold to the client before use or becomes and ingredient or component part of the tangible personal property sold to the client. This point is discussed at subdivision (d) of Regulation 1540. If you have any further questions regarding this, feel free to write again. Very truly yours,

Ronald L. Dick
Senior Tax Counsel
RLD:sr
Enc.

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1992. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace