How were supermarket advertising circulars taxed when mailed to shoppers, delivered to merchants, distributed door to door, or inserted in newspapers?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1987. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A business produced complete newsprint advertising circulars for supermarkets, including typesetting, layout, printing, mailing labels, and delivery. It asked about four distribution methods.
Circulars delivered to the Postal Service for mailing directly to the merchants' customers qualified under section 6379.5. Mailing them to the merchants did not, because the merchants were the purchasers rather than other free recipient-owners.
The same defect applied when the printer first delivered circulars to the merchant and the merchant later took them to the Postal Service. Purchaser delivery made that sale taxable.
Door-to-door distribution qualified only when the printer delivered the circulars to a distributor that met the common-carrier definition: transporting property for hire and offering services indiscriminately to the public.
Circulars inserted into and distributed with a qualifying newspaper or periodical were exempt under section 6362 as component parts. For that separate exemption, delivery to the merchant did not defeat the result.
What this means for you
Grocery advertisers, printers, distributors, newspapers, and tax professionals
Classify each distribution channel separately. Track the ultimate addressee, any purchaser possession, the door distributor's common-carrier status, and whether inserts are actually attached to or inserted in and distributed with the newspaper.
Common questions
Q: Did Postal Service delivery always qualify?
A: No. It qualified when the circulars were mailed to the merchants' customers, not when mailed to the merchants themselves.
Q: Could the merchant receive the circulars and mail them later?
A: Not under the printed-sales-message exemption; that purchaser delivery made the sale taxable.
Q: Did any door-to-door distributor qualify?
A: No. The distributor had to qualify as a common carrier under the opinion's definition.
Q: Why were newspaper inserts different?
A: They qualified under the separate newspaper-component exemption when inserted in and distributed with the newspaper or periodical.
Citations and references
- California Revenue and Taxation Code §§ 6362 and 6379.5
- California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1540
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: CDTFA Annotated Legal Opinions
- Annotation page: Annotation 432.0002.150
- Original supporting opinion: 432.0002.150 PDF
Original ruling text
432.0002.150
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
February 27, 1987
Mr. S--- F. C---, President
M--- A--- S---, Inc.
P. O. Box XXXXX
---, CA XXXXX
Dear Mr. C---:
This is in reply to your January 26, 1987 letter regarding the recent addition of section 6379.5 to the Revenue and Taxation Code. Specifically, you noted that you are in the business of providing advertising circulars to supermarkets. The circulars are printed on newsprint. The merchants call or mail in their advertising copy, and you produce the circular in its entirety. You perform the typesetting, layout, printing, affixing of mail labels and delivery to the store and/or the United States Post Office. Given this information, you asked whether the exemption applies to your sales of: “(1)
Circulars that are delivered direct to and mailed by the U. S. Post Office.”
Revenue and Taxation Code section 6379.5 provides:
“There are exempted from the taxes imposed by this part the gross receipts from the sale of, and the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of catalogs, letters, circulars, brochures, and pamphlets consisting substantially of printed sales messages for goods and services printed to the special order of the purchaser and mailed or delivered by the seller, the seller’s agent, or a mailing house, acting as the agent for the purchaser, through the United States Postal Service or by common carrier to any other person at no cost to that person who becomes the owner thereof.” If your delivery of the advertising circulars to the United States Post Office is to mail the circulars to the customers of the merchants, the sale qualifies for the exemption. On the other hand, if your delivery of the circulars to the Post Office is to mail them to the merchants, the sale does not qualify for the exemption because the delivery would not be “to any other person at no cost to that person who becomes the owner thereof.”
Mr. S--- F. C--M--- A---S---, Inc.
-2-
February 27, 1987
432.0002.150
“(2) Circulars that are delivered to our customer and then delivered to and mailed by the U.S. Post Office.” Tax would apply to this sale. As noted above, if you deliver the circulars to the merchant, the sale does not qualify for the exemption. “(3)
Circulars that are handed out by a distributor on a door to door basis.”
The sale qualifies for the exemption where you deliver the circulars to a distributor which qualifies as a common carrier for distribution to the prospective customers of the merchants. A common carrier is a person engaged in the business of transporting property for hire and who offers the services indiscriminately to the public. “(4)
Circulars that are inserted in a newspaper.”
Revenue and Taxation Code section 6362 provides an exemption from sales and use tax for the sale and use of “tangible personal property which becomes an ingredient or component part of any newspaper or periodical issued at average intervals not exceeding three months and any such newspaper or periodical.” Advertising circulars are considered as component parts of a newspaper or periodical when attached to or inserted in and distributed with the newspaper or periodical. Accordingly, your sales of circulars that are for insertion in a newspaper are exempt whether or not you deliver the circulars to the merchant. We are enclosing a copy of Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1540, Newspapers and Periodicals, for your further information. We hope this answers your question; however, if you need further information, feel free to write again. Very truly yours,
R. L. Dick
Tax Counsel
RLD:sr
Enc.
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1987. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace