Were charges for producing personalized letters by laser imaging taxable in California?

Short answer Yes. California treated laser imaging as taxable printing for a consumer, even if the customer supplied the paper or other materials.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 430.0147
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1986-04-09
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A direct-mail agency asking about data, computer, word-processing, laser-imaging, and addressing services

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1986. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1986
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This annotation focuses on the laser-imaging answer in a multi-topic 1986 staff letter about direct-mail data processing, computer output, word processing, personalization, and addressing. The source described laser imaging as printing personalized letters on a large photocopier; separate mailing-preparation and information-processing activities received different treatment. Current printing, computer-output, direct-mail, personalization, customer-furnished-property, and sales-tax rules control today.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A direct-mail agency asked about laser imaging, described as a computerized process that produced personalized letters on a machine resembling a large photocopier.

California treated the activity as printing for a consumer. The charge was taxable whether the printer or the customer furnished the paper or other materials.

The official source answered six other questions about data processing, computer personalization, word-processing output, envelope addressing, and admarking. Those separate answers did not change the classification of laser-imaged personalized letters as taxable printing.

Common questions

Did customer-furnished paper make the laser-imaging charge nontaxable?

No. The letter said printing and similar operations for consumers were taxable regardless of who furnished the paper or materials.

Was all computer-related work in the source taxable?

No. The source distinguished taxable printing from some nontaxable information processing and mailing-preparation services.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6010.9
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulations 1502, 1502.1, 1504, and 1541

Source

Original ruling text

430.0147
STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

WILLIAM M. BENNETT
First District, Kentfield

1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(PO BOX 1799, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95808)
(916) 445-4424

CONWAY H. COLLIS
Second District, Los Angeles
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR
Third District, San Diego
RICHARD NEVINS
Fourth District, Pasadena
KENNETH CORY
Controller, Sacramento

April 9, 1986

DOUGLAS D. BELL
Executive Secretary

Dear X------------------,
I am responding to your letter of January 27, 1986 wherein you requested a legal opinion as to the application of sales or use tax as it applies to the activities engaged in by' your company. Specifically, you requested information concerning seven items that you provide to your customers and which are set forth below. “1. Is data processing taxable? All of it? Does that include data processing for analyzing results?” Generally, charges for producing, fabricating, processing, printing, imprinting, or otherwise physically altering customer-furnished tangible personal property, such as computer discs, are subject to sales tax. (See Regulation 1502 (c) (2).) However, charges for processing, customer-furnished information such as sales or payroll data into human readable form are generally not subject to tax. For information concerning specific applications, please refer to Regulation 1502, a copy of which is enclosed for your information. “2. Is computer programming taxable? (The programming might be. to prepare special computerized letters that will integrate the person's name and address into the text of the letter.)” Although your question refers to computer programming, from the other information you have provided it does not appear that what you are referring to is in fact true "programming." Section 6010.9 of the Revenue and Taxation Code defines a computer program as a complete plan for the solution of a problem, such as the complete sequence of automatic data processing equipment instructions necessary to solve a problem. What you appear to be referring to would be the keying of commands to carry out a specific task, i.e., personalization of letters. Regulation 1502 {d)(5) states that the using of a computer as a mere printing instrument, as in the preparation of the personalized computer printed letters does not constitute processing of customer furnished information which would otherwise be nontaxable. Thus, the charges to produce personalized letters by means or a computer are subject to sales tax. “3. Is laser imaging taxable? This is a computerized process that produces personalized letters on sort of a giant photo copier.”

Tax applies to charges for printing, imprinting, and other similar operations for consumers, regardless of whether or not paper or materials are furnished by the customer (Regulation 1541). Hence, charges for printing of personalized letters by means of lazer imaging are subject to tax. “4. Is computer fill (filling in the name and address only on a letter or a business reply card) taxable?” Again, the use of the computer as a printing instrument to personalize letters is subject to sales tax. Similarly, the imprinting of a business's name and address on a business reply card is also subject to tax. (Regulation 1502 (d)(3).) “5. Is match-fill (filling in the name and address using word processing equipment, but with a pre-printed letter) taxable?” Regulation 1502.1 states that charges for furnishing original copies of letters or documents prepared either by using a typewriter or word processor are not subject to sales tax. Nor does sales tax apply to charges for carbon copies produced simultaneously with the original. However, sales tax does apply to charges for multiple copies produced on word processing equipment. Multiple copies include form letters which are produced with a slight variation which personalizes essentially the same letter. For more information on specific applications of word processing equipment, please see Regulation 1502.1, a copy of which is enclosed for your information. “6. How about if a computer or word processing equipment were used to address the outer envelope?” Regulation 1502 (d)(3) states that tax does not apply to charges for services rendered in preparing materials for mailing. Such exempt services include addressing of envelopes, using either computers or word processing equipment. Therefore, this charge for services provided to your clients would not be subject to sales or use tax. “7. Admarking is a process for' addressing. It is used in place of labels on outer envelopes, or in the business reply card. Is this taxable? It is usually handled as a part of letter shop.” The imprinting or affixing of names and addresses on property to be mailed is considered to be an exempt service (see Regulation 1504). Thus, the charges for addressing by means of using the admarking process would not be subject to sales or use tax. However the charges for the printing of addresses on business reply cards is subject to sales tax as indicated in 4 above.

I hope that the information provided adequately answers your questions. If you need additional information, please contact us again. Sincerely,

Teresa Armstrong
Legal Counsel
TA:ba

Xxxxxxx
313-7158

February 4, 1986

Dear X------------------,
Your letter of January 27, 1986 requesting a tax opinion has been forwarded to our legal staff for direct reply to you.

Very truly yours,

Harry Rutta
Supervising Tax Auditor
HR:ec
Bcc:

Headquarters – Legal
w/attachment
Taxpayer believes many of their services come under Regulation 1502.1 (Word Processing). However, I do not believe they are a word processing company. Also, many of the terms mentioned in the taxpayer’s letter are unfamiliar to me. Please send us a copy of your response.

January 27, 1986

State Board of Equalization
3361 Sepulveda
Caller 3652
Culver City, CA 90231
To Whom It May Concern:
I have a few questions about what items are taxable to our agency’s clients. The agency creates and produces direct mail for many clients. Often this includes computer manipulation of data to prepare the mailing lists (or to analyze lists or to analyze results). My questions are: 1.

Is data processing taxable? All of it? Does that include data processing for analysing results?

2.

Is computer programming taxable? (The programming might be to prepare special computerized letters that would integrate the person's name and address into the text of the letter.)

3.

Is laser imaging taxable? This is a computerized process that produces personalized letters on a sort of giant photocopier.

4.

Is “computer fill” {filling in the name and address only on a letter or a Business Reply Card) taxable?

5.

Is "match fill" (filling in the name and address usin8 word processing equipment, but with a preprinted letter) taxable?

6.

How about if a computer or word processing equipment were used just to address the outer envelope?

7.

"Admarking" is a process for addressing. It is used in place of labels on outer envelopes or on the Business Reply Card. Is this taxable? It is usually handled as a part of lettershop.

I want to also mention that our agency is operating as a "seller" of the printing, not as an "agent" as your rules outline. Thank you for your attention to this and for your prompt response. Sincerely, X-----------------------

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1986. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace