Did the needle-free Vitajet insulin injector qualify for exemption when sold by a nonpharmacist?

Short answer No. California classified Vitajet as an insulin syringe, but the historical exemption required a registered pharmacist to furnish it.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 425.0930
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1988-02-08
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A nonpharmacist retailer appointed to sell Vitajet

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1988. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1988
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This February 8, 1988 staff opinion classified the described needle-free Vitajet as an insulin syringe but applied a historical requirement that a registered pharmacist furnish the syringe. The requester was not a pharmacist. Current diabetes-device and dispensing rules control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California classified Vitajet as an insulin syringe because it injected an ultrafine stream of insulin through the skin into underlying tissue without a needle. That product classification did not make the requester's sales exempt.

Under the historical rule, an insulin syringe had to be furnished by a registered pharmacist to a person treating diabetes as directed by a physician. The requester was a first-aid and safety-equipment retailer, not a registered pharmacist, so its end-user sales were taxable whether or not the customer had a prescription.

Common questions

Did needle-free operation prevent Vitajet from being a syringe?

No. The opinion used the product's liquid-injection function to classify it as a syringe.

Did a physician's prescription exempt the nonpharmacist sale?

No. The pharmacist-furnishing condition was not satisfied.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6369(b)(2) — general device exclusion
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6369(e) and Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591(h) — historical insulin-syringe exception and pharmacist condition
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6051 — general sales-tax rule

Source

Original ruling text

425.0930

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 322-3684

February 8, 1988
REDACTED TEXT1

Re: REDACTED TEXT
Dear REDACTED TEXT:
Your letter of December 30, 1987 has been referred to me for a reply. You request our opinion concerning the correct application of tax to your sales of a product called “Vitajet”. As I understand the facts, REDACTED TEXT is a retailer of first aid, fire and safety equipment. A review of REDACTED TEXT’s application for a seller’s permit indicates that REDACTED TEXT is not a registered pharmacist. REDACTED TEXT has recently been named as the exclusive agent for the sale of Vitajet. Vitajet is described in a brochure that you enclosed with your letter as an insulin injection system that injects an ultrafine stream of insulin through the skin and into the tissue under the skin without the use of a needle. Nothing penetrates the skin except the insulin. Specifically, you write as follows: “It is our understanding that if this product is sold with a prescription, it is not subject to sales tax. “If, however, the product is sold direct to the end-user, without a prescription, then the normal sales tax rule applies.” Except where the sales are specifically excluded or exempted from taxation by statute, sales tax applies to the gross receipts of retailers from all retail sales of tangible personal property in this state (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051). Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6369 provides that prescription medicines are exempt from sales tax, but Section 6369(b)(2), in pertinent part, excludes from the term medicines articles which are in the nature of instruments, devices or other physical equipment. However, Section 6369(e) and Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591(h), which interprets and applies the code, provides that the sale of insulin syringes are not subject to tax, provided the insulin syringes are furnished by a registered pharmacist to a person for the treatment of diabetes as directed by a physician. Finally, Dorland’s Medical Dictionary defines a syringe as “an instrument for injecting liquids into any vessel or cavity.”

REDACTED TEXT

-2-

February 8, 1988
425.0930

Applying the above criteria, it is our opinion that Vitajet is a syringe, since it injects insulin fluid into body tissue. In general, however, syringes do not qualify as tax exempt medicines, notwithstanding the fact the syringe is prescribed by a physician, since a syringe is in the nature of an instrument, device or physical equipment pursuant to Secton 6369(b)(2). An exception to this general rule applies to insulin syringes, the sale of which are exempt from tax as described above in Section 6369(3) and Regulation 1591(h). However, insulin syringes sold by REDACTED TEXT do not qualify for this exemption since REDACTED TEXT is not a registered pharmacist. Accordingly, REDACTED TEXT’s gross receipts from the sale of Vitajet are subject to tax when REDACTED TEXT sells Vitajet to the end-user, whether or not that user has a prescription for Vitajet by a physician. I hope the above information is helpful. Enclosed for your review and reference is a copy of Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591 (Prescription Medicines). If you have any further questions concerning this topic, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, Robert J. Stipe Tax Counsel RJS:sr Enc. bc:

Sacramento District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1988. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace