Did selling a used accessible van before registration eliminate the purchaser's California use tax?

Short answer No. More than 400 miles during ownership supported California use, so tax remained due despite resale before registration. But the value of qualifying existing accessibility modifications was excluded.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 425.0909
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1994-10-20
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Board Consumer Use Tax Section regarding a disabled purchaser's used van

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1994. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1994
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This October 20, 1994 internal memorandum applied historical vehicle and use-tax rules to a used van purchased from an unlicensed seller. It did not exempt the whole vehicle: only the fair market value attributable to qualifying modifications already present at purchase was excluded from the tax measure. The original source uses period terminology for disability that this summary modernizes without changing the holding. CDTFA says statutory law controls if it conflicts with an annotation. Seller status, evidence of use, modification value, and current law can change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A disabled purchaser bought a used van from an unlicensed seller, hoped to adapt it to her needs, never registered it, and resold it after finding that she could not use it as intended. The odometer increased by more than 400 miles during her ownership.

California said that mileage supported a finding that she bought and used the van in California. Selling it before applying to transfer registration did not eliminate the use-tax liability.

The tax measure did not include the fair market value of accessibility modifications already on the van when she bought it, to the extent they enabled the vehicle to transport a disabled person. The exclusion applied to that modified portion, not the entire used van.

Common questions

Did failure to register the van prevent use tax?

No. The opinion relied on evidence of actual California use during ownership.

Was the full purchase price exempt because the van had been modified?

No. Only the value attributable to qualifying existing modifications was excluded.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6283 — use tax on the described purchase from an unlicensed vehicle seller
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6369.4(b) and Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591(l) — exclusion for the portion modified to transport a disabled person
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6356.5 — new-vehicle provision contrasted with the modified-vehicle rule
  • Business Taxes Law Guide Annotation 585.0520 — cited for liability despite resale before registration transfer

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

To:

Ms. Oveta L. Riffle, Chief
Consumer Use Tax Section (MIC:37)

From:

Kelly W. Ching
Staff Counsel

Subject:

X----------------------------

425.0909

Date:

October 20, 1994

This is in response to your memorandum of July 25, 1994 regarding the application of tax to the sale of a vehicle modified for physically handicapped persons. You state that X----------------- purchased the vehicle, a van, in June of 1990. X-------- is a quadriplegic who purchased the vehicle “in hopes of converting it to her needs.” You refer to a letter sent on November 23, 1993 by a X-------------- in which he states that X----------- “was unable to have full usage of this vehicle modified for the physically challenged due to the sensitized brake system….” Apparently the van had already been modified to some extent for use by the physically challenged before X-------------- bought it. In her letter of July 10, 1993, X-------------- claims that she never drove the can because she was unable to adapt it to suit her needs. She also never registered it with the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). In March of 1991 X---------- sold the van. The mileage reported upon X--------------’s purchase of the van was 50,507.3, and the mileage reported upon the sale by her of the van was 50,938. You ask whether she owes use tax on her purchase of the van. Our understanding is that the person who sold the van to X--------------- was not licensed or certificated pursuant to the Vehicle Code as a manufacturer, dealer, dismantler, or lessorretailer of automobiles, so the use tax, but not the sales tax may apply. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6283.) You indicate you belief that use tax is due because records show mileage accrued during X------------------’s ownership. We agree that over 400 miles traveled by the van during X------’s ownership supports a conclusion that she purchased the van for use in California and used it. As a person who purchased a motor vehicle and who is liable for use tax, X------- remains liable even though she sold the vehicle before making an application for transfer of registration. (Business Taxes Law Guide Annotation 585.0520 (8/10/64).) However, in the case of sales to handicapped persons of vehicles modified for physically handicapped persons, the gross receipts from the sale, and the storage, use, or other consumption

attributable to that portion of the vehicle which has been modified to enable the vehicle to be used to transport a physically handicapped person or persons are exempt from sales and use tax. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6369.4(b), Reg. 1591(1).) Therefore, the fair market value of modifications that existed when X-------------- purchased the van, if any, should be excluded from the measure of tax. (Cf. rev. & Tax. Code § 6356.5, which applies to “new” vehicles, with Rev. & Tax. Code
§ 6369.4 (b), which applies to “modified vehicles” without specifying that they must be new.) If you have further questions, please feel free to write again.

KWC:cl

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1994. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace