Which urinary-incontinence devices and related supplies qualified as exempt medicines?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1985. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
California concluded that a urinary-incontinence device consisting of a catheter, collection bag, and necessary connectors and caps was an exempt prosthetic device when designed to be fully worn in or on the user's body. The catheter could be indwelling, intermittent, external, or suction.
Topical antiseptics, adhesives, adhesive removers, and insertion lubricants also qualified when prescribed by a physician for use with an exempt device. Cleaners and equipment used to remove contaminants, catheter insertion kits, and irrigation syringes remained taxable.
Common questions
Did every catheter-and-bag system qualify?
No. The memorandum required the device to be designed to be fully worn in or on the body.
Which related supplies were exempt?
Prescribed topical antiseptics, adhesives, adhesive removers, and insertion lubricants used with an exempt device.
Which related items remained taxable?
Device cleaners and cleaning equipment, insertion kits, and irrigation syringes.
Citations and references
- California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591(b)(5) — prosthetic-device provision applied to qualifying body-worn urinary systems
- California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591(j) — ostomy-appliance provision discussed but not used as the basis for the conclusion
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/425-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/425-0859.pdf
Original ruling text
State of California
Board of Equalization
Legal Division (MIC:82)
Memorandum
425.0859
To:
--- Auditing
From:
Charles J. Graziano
Subject:
Date:
January 4, 1985
This is in reply to your memo dated October 3, 1984, wherein you request we resolve an inconsistency with regard to the staff’s application of tax to the sale of “urinary incontenent supplies,” i.e., devices which are used to collect urine from patients in the nonsurgical treatment of urinary incontinence. In my letter dated October 4, 1983 to Ms. Jeannie Tindel of the California Pharmacists Association, I stated that urinary incontinence supplies do not qualify as exempt medicines under Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591(b)(5) as prosthetic devices, nor do they qualify under 1591(j) as exempt ostomy appliances. However, as you point out, the Board has previously decided in the --- petition for redetermination (--, Hearing Officer Robert H. Anderson, 3-2-82) that urinaryincontinence supplies which consist of catheters and drainage bags are exempt from taxation as prosthetic devices under Regulation 1591(b)(5). We have further reviewed the use of these devices and now conclude that such urinary incontinence devices do qualify as exempt prosthetic devices under Regulation 1591(b)(5), provided such items are fully worn in or on the body of the user. In our view, a urinary incontinence device which is comprised of a catheter (indwelling, intermittent, external, or suction), and a collection bag, together with any connectors and caps which are necessary to complete the fluid track, and is designed to be rully worn on or in the body of the user is a nontaxable prosthetic device under Regulation 1591(b)(5) for the reason that such a device assists in the functioning of the user’s bladder. In addition, it is our opinion that such items as topical antiseptic solutions, adhesives (used to hold the device in place), adhesive removers (used to remove the adhesive), and lubricants (used to insert the urinary device), qualify as tax exempt medicines under Regulation 1591 when sold under a physician’s prescription for use with an exempt urinary incontinence device. In our view, however, the following items do not qualify as exempt prosthetic devices or otherwise qualify as exempt medicines under Regulation 1591, even though such items are used with exempt urinary
-2-
January 4, 1985
425.0859
incontinence devices: cleaners and equipment which are used to remove contaminants from the urinary incontinence device; insertion kits which are used to insert the catheter; and irrigation syringes, which are used to clean the catheter.
CJG:ba
cc:
Mr. G. J. Jugum
Mr. D. J. Hennessy
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1985. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace