Which urinary-incontinence devices and related supplies qualified as exempt medicines?

Short answer A fully body-worn catheter-and-bag system qualified, as did prescribed antiseptics, adhesives, removers, and lubricants; cleaners, insertion kits, and irrigation syringes did not.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 425.0859
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1985-01-04
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Board auditing staff asking how tax applied to urinary-incontinence supplies

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1985. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1985
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This January 4, 1985 internal memorandum reconsidered an earlier staff position and depended on the device being fully worn in or on the user's body. Related supplies qualified only under the uses and prescription conditions described. Current product design, use, prescription status, and law control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California concluded that a urinary-incontinence device consisting of a catheter, collection bag, and necessary connectors and caps was an exempt prosthetic device when designed to be fully worn in or on the user's body. The catheter could be indwelling, intermittent, external, or suction.

Topical antiseptics, adhesives, adhesive removers, and insertion lubricants also qualified when prescribed by a physician for use with an exempt device. Cleaners and equipment used to remove contaminants, catheter insertion kits, and irrigation syringes remained taxable.

Common questions

Did every catheter-and-bag system qualify?

No. The memorandum required the device to be designed to be fully worn in or on the body.

Which related supplies were exempt?

Prescribed topical antiseptics, adhesives, adhesive removers, and insertion lubricants used with an exempt device.

Which related items remained taxable?

Device cleaners and cleaning equipment, insertion kits, and irrigation syringes.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591(b)(5) — prosthetic-device provision applied to qualifying body-worn urinary systems
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591(j) — ostomy-appliance provision discussed but not used as the basis for the conclusion

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization
Legal Division (MIC:82)

Memorandum
425.0859

To:

--- Auditing

From:

Charles J. Graziano

Subject:


Date:

January 4, 1985

This is in reply to your memo dated October 3, 1984, wherein you request we resolve an inconsistency with regard to the staff’s application of tax to the sale of “urinary incontenent supplies,” i.e., devices which are used to collect urine from patients in the nonsurgical treatment of urinary incontinence. In my letter dated October 4, 1983 to Ms. Jeannie Tindel of the California Pharmacists Association, I stated that urinary incontinence supplies do not qualify as exempt medicines under Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591(b)(5) as prosthetic devices, nor do they qualify under 1591(j) as exempt ostomy appliances. However, as you point out, the Board has previously decided in the --- petition for redetermination (--, Hearing Officer Robert H. Anderson, 3-2-82) that urinaryincontinence supplies which consist of catheters and drainage bags are exempt from taxation as prosthetic devices under Regulation 1591(b)(5). We have further reviewed the use of these devices and now conclude that such urinary incontinence devices do qualify as exempt prosthetic devices under Regulation 1591(b)(5), provided such items are fully worn in or on the body of the user. In our view, a urinary incontinence device which is comprised of a catheter (indwelling, intermittent, external, or suction), and a collection bag, together with any connectors and caps which are necessary to complete the fluid track, and is designed to be rully worn on or in the body of the user is a nontaxable prosthetic device under Regulation 1591(b)(5) for the reason that such a device assists in the functioning of the user’s bladder. In addition, it is our opinion that such items as topical antiseptic solutions, adhesives (used to hold the device in place), adhesive removers (used to remove the adhesive), and lubricants (used to insert the urinary device), qualify as tax exempt medicines under Regulation 1591 when sold under a physician’s prescription for use with an exempt urinary incontinence device. In our view, however, the following items do not qualify as exempt prosthetic devices or otherwise qualify as exempt medicines under Regulation 1591, even though such items are used with exempt urinary


-2-

January 4, 1985
425.0859

incontinence devices: cleaners and equipment which are used to remove contaminants from the urinary incontinence device; insertion kits which are used to insert the catheter; and irrigation syringes, which are used to clean the catheter.

CJG:ba
cc:

Mr. G. J. Jugum
Mr. D. J. Hennessy

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1985. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace