Were sales of medical oxygen to municipal fire departments exempt without a doctor's direction?

Short answer Yes. California exempted oxygen sold to a municipality for human treatment and found no physician-direction requirement in that government-sale provision.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 425.0680
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1969-01-28
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A seller asking about medical oxygen sold to municipal fire departments

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1969. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1969
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This 1969 opinion addressed medical oxygen sold to a municipal fire department for treatment of human beings. It did not remove the treatment-use or government-buyer requirements. Current law and actual oxygen use control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California exempted medical oxygen sold to municipal fire departments for use in treating human beings. Once medical oxygen met the medicine definition, section 6369(a)(5) covered its sale to the state or a political subdivision or municipal corporation for human treatment.

The letter found no separate requirement that the municipal fire department use the oxygen at a doctor's direction, assuming it used the oxygen for treatment substantially as hospitals did.

Common questions

Did the fire department need a doctor's prescription for the exemption?

The opinion said no under the government-sale provision it applied.

Did any sale of oxygen to a municipality qualify?

No. The oxygen had to be medical oxygen used for treatment of a human being.

How did this differ from individual purchases?

Annotation 425.0660 addressed individual prescription use; this opinion applied the separate government-buyer provision.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6369(a)(5) — sales to government entities for human treatment
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6369(b) — medicine definition applied to medical oxygen

Source

Original ruling text

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

425.0680

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

January 28, 1969

Dear Mr. [X],
After reviewing your letter of December 17, 1968 and Mr. B. E. Banks’ letter to you of December 10, I have concluded that you are correct in your contention that sales of oxygen to municipal fire departments are exempt. We have earlier held that oxygen is a “medicine” when sold to hospitals or to individuals pursuant to a doctor’s prescription. Nothing in Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6369(b), defining “medicines” requires that they be prescribed by authorized persons. Rather, the section speaks of “any substance or preparation intended for use by external or internal application to the human body in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment or prevention of disease and which is commonly recognized as a substance or preparation intended for such use ....” In my opinion, once we find under any fact circumstances that medical oxygen is a “preparation or substance” which meets the terms of this definition, the issue is settled for all sales of medical oxygen meeting the provisions of Section 6369(a). Section 6369(a) (5) merely states “Sold to this State or any political subdivision or municipal corporation thereof, for use in the treatment of a human being ....” The code does not define “treatment of human being”. Provided the oxygen is used for “treatment” of a human being, I assume it is used in substantially the same way and for the same purposes by the fire department as by hospitals, etc. Since the only requirement of the code is that it be sold to the political subdivision, and there is no requirement that it be at a doctor’s direction, the sale is exempt. Very truly yours,

T. P. Putnam
Tax Counsel

By Lawrence A. Augusta
LAA:ph [lb]

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1969. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace