Did prescription CPM pads and hypothermia blankets qualify as exempt orthotic devices?

Short answer No. California found they had no function without off-body Hot/Ice Machines and also served temperature-control uses beyond bracing or support.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 425.0292
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1989-08-01
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
The president of a medical-product company

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1989
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This August 1, 1989 staff opinion relied on the described CPM pads and hypothermia blankets having no function without Hot/Ice Machines and having temperature-control uses beyond body support. Current product design, use, and law control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California treated the described CPM pads and hypothermia blankets as taxable rather than exempt orthotic devices. They were prescribed for post-operative healing and used with Hot/Ice Machines, but the pads and blankets had no function without those machines and therefore were not fully worn, self-functioning devices on the patient.

The products also had uses beyond acting as a brace, support, or correction for body structure, including use after implantation surgery and to control body temperature. Those facts further prevented the orthotic classification.

Common questions

Did prescription-only use make the products exempt?

No. They still had to meet the orthotic-device definition.

Did physical contact with the patient count as being fully worn?

No. Their dependence on the separate Hot/Ice Machine meant the full functioning system was not worn by the patient.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591 — historical orthotic-device and prescription-medicine framework applied in the letter

Source

Original ruling text

425.0292

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 324-5589

August 1, 1989

Mr. [H]
President
[M]
XXXX --- ----- ---, California XXXXX
S- -- XX-XXXXXX
Dear Mr. [H]:
This is in response to your letter of June 21, 1989, to the Audit Evaluation and Planning Unit regarding your company’s sales of CPM Pads and Hypothermia Blankets. You would like to know whether the CPM Pads and Hypothermia Blankets qualify as exempt prescription medicines under Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591. Both the CPM Pads and Hypothermia Blankets are used in conjunction with Hot/Ice Machines as part of the orthopedic surgical process post operatively to promote the healing process in human beings. They may only be used on a prescription basis. Effective October 1, 1977, certain orthotic devices “designed to be worn on the person of the user as a brace, support, or correction for the body structure” were included in the definition of exempt prescription medicines. Each orthotic device must be fully worn on the patient. According to the information supplied in your letter, the CPM Pads and Hypothermia Blankets are only used in conjunction with the Hot/Ice Machine and in fact have no function without the machine. Additionally we note that they have other uses aside from acting as a “brace, support, or correction” for the body structure since they are also used after implantation surgery and to control body temperature. Because the pads are not functional without the machines and thus cannot be fully worn on the patient, we are of the opinion that neither the CPM Pads nor the Hypothermia Blankets qualify as exempt orthotic devices under Regulation 1591.

Mr. [H]

-2-

August 1, 1989
425.0292

If you have further questions concerning this matter, please write this office again. Very truly yours,

Mary C. Armstrong
Senior Tax Counsel
MCA:wak
cc:

Phillip K. Klepin
Audit Supervisor, San Diego

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1989. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace