Were permanently implanted coronary stents exempt medicines?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1997. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A small latticed stainless-steel stent was mounted on an angioplasty balloon, expanded against a narrowed artery, and left permanently in place after the balloon was removed.
California treated the stent as exempt medicine because it remained permanently implanted and assisted the circulatory system by holding the artery open.
The letter expressly did not decide whether the angioplasty catheter used to insert the stent was exempt.
Common questions
Was the coronary stent exempt?
Yes.
Why?
It was permanently implanted and assisted a natural artery's function.
Did the ruling cover the balloon catheter?
No.
Citations and references
- 18 Cal. Code Regs. § 1591(b)(2) — permanently implanted devices that assist a natural organ, artery, vein, or limb
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/425-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/425-0275.pdf
Original ruling text
425.0275
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
JOHAN KLEHS
First District, Hayward
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(PO BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0082)
TELEPHONE (916) 324-3828
FAX (916) 323-3387
DEAN F. ANDAL
Second District, Stockton
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
KATHLEEN CONNELL
Controller, Sacramento
_______
November 21, 1997
JOHN CHIANG
Acting Member
Fourth District, Los Angeles
_______
E. L. SORENSEN, JR.
Executive Director
Mr. M--- M--Vice President, Finance, and CFO
G--- Corporation
XXXX --- Drive
P.O. Box XXXXX
--- ---, CA XXXXX-XXXX
RE:
SC --- XX-XXXXXX
Coronary Stents
Dear Mr. M---:
I am answering your letter to me dated October 6, 1997. You asked for an opinion as to the application of sales tax to G---’s sales of coronary stents. You describe how your product is used as follows: “The major challenge to angioplasty is clinical restenosis, or the renarrowing of the blood vessel following the angioplasty procedure. Clinical restenosis can manifest as either the collapse of the artery as a result of the weakening of the artery walls following angioplasty or as the reoccurrence of the cholesterol or calcium deposits within the artery wall. Clinical restenosis may occur immediately following the angioplasty procedure, or anytime over the next several months or years. Treatment of clinical restenosis generally requires a subsequent angioplasty procedure or, in more sever instances, surgery. Clinical restenosis occurs in approximately twenty to thirty percent of patients undergoing angioplasty procedures. “Coronary stenting is a technique which mechanically props open the artery through implementation of a small, latticed stainless steel tube at the site of the narrowing. The stainless steel tube - the stent - is premounted on a coronary angioplasty balloon catheter. As the balloon catheter is inflated during angioplasty, the stent expends and is compressed against the artery walls. When the balloon is deflated, the expanded stent remains implanted in the artery. This
Mr. M--- M---
-2-
November 21, 1997
425.0275
technique of mechanically propping open the artery with the stent greatly reduces the rate of clinical restenosis.” You further indicate that the stent remains permanently in the body of the patient. We do not render an opinion on whether or not sales of the angioplasty catheter used to insert the stent are exempt from tax under Regulation 1591(n) as that is not your question. You are concerned only with the coronary stent. You state that the stent remains permanently implanted in the body and assists the circulatory system by holding the affected artery open after the angioplasty procedure. It thus qualifies as a “medicine” pursuant to Regulation 1591(b)(2). As a result, its sales are exempt from tax. I hope the above discussion has answered your question. If you need anything further, please do not hesitate to write again. Sincerely,
John L. Waid
Senior Tax Counsel
JLW:sr
cc: --- District Administrator - --
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1997. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace