Did a computerized ambulatory drug-delivery pump qualify as exempt medicine?

Short answer Yes. California treated the programmable pump as an exempt drug-infusion device, while a nonprogrammable access port remained taxable.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 425.0267
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1989-06-12
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
The accounting department of a medical-device company
Topics

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1989
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This June 12, 1989 staff letter distinguished the computerized programmable pump from the separate Port-A-Cath access system. The exemption depended on the pump's programmable drug-delivery function. Current product capabilities and law control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California treated the Computerized Ambulatory Drug Delivery Pump as an exempt programmable drug-infusion device under section 6369(c)(6). A programmable battery pump used with a Port-A-Cath could also qualify on that basis.

The Port-A-Cath system itself did not qualify because it merely provided a port for injection and was not programmable. The letter also explained that a refund claim for tax previously paid on qualifying pumps had to be written and state the specific grounds for the claim.

Common questions

Did the access port receive the same exemption as the pump?

No. California separated the programmable delivery function from the nonprogrammable port.

Could a programmable battery pump used with the port qualify?

Yes. The letter treated that pump as a programmable drug-infusion device.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6369(c)(6) — programmable drug-infusion-device provision
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6904 — written refund-claim requirement discussed in the letter

Source

Original ruling text

425.0267

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 324-5589

June 12, 1989

Ms. G--- P--Accounting Department
P--- D--- Inc.
XXXX --- --- Road
--- ---, M--- XXXXX
RE:

SC – XX-XXXXXX

Dear Ms. P---:
This is in response to your letter of March 28, 1989. You have requested our opinion regarding the correct application of tax to various items sold by your company. You have also requested information regarding the various tax rates and the procedure for filing tax refunds. As we understand it, P--- D--- has two principal product lines. The Port-A-Cath which are totally implantable port and intravenous catheter systems used for single injections or continuous infusion and Computerized Ambulatory Drug Delivery pumps (CADDP) which provide a system for administering medication. Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6369(c)(6) provides that “programmable drug infusion devices” are considered medicines as that term is used in Section 6369. We are of the opinion that Computerized Ambulatory Drug Delivery pumps qualify as programmable drug infusion devices under Section 6369(c)(6) and your sale of CADDP is exempt from tax. The PortA-Cath system is not exempt from tax because it is not a programmable drug infusion device. It merely serves as a port for the injection of medicine. According to the literature you supplied, the Port-A-Cath can also be used in conjunction with a programmable battery pump which meters out the drug. This pump would be considered a programmable drug infusion device. We are enclosing a copy of our pamphlet “Tax Tips for District Taxes” for your reference. This booklet explains the various rates now in effect in California.

Ms. Genny Pieterson

-2-

June 12, 1989
425.0267

You have also requested information regarding the procedure to be followed in filing a claim for refund with the State Board. Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6904 provides: “Every claim shall be in writing and shall state the specific grounds upon which the claim is grounded.” Claims for refund for tax previously paid on sales of drug infusion devices should be addressed to the Board of Equalization, Attention Audit Review and Refund Unit, P.O. Box 942878, Sacramento, California, 94278-0001. If you have further questions concerning this matter, please write this office again. Very truly yours,

Mary C. Armstrong
Senior Tax Counsel

MCA:cl
Enclosure
bc:

Out-of-State District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1989. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace