Did cleansers used for stoma care, feces removal, skin protection, or staff handwashing qualify as medicines in California?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
California classified the described products used to clean stomas and human feces from skin, treat skin disorders, or prevent skin sores and rashes as medicines. It also applied the Purdue Frederick decision to qualifying cleansers used by hospital personnel to wash their hands before treating patients.
The conclusion addressed medicine classification. The letter's prescription-medicine framework still required the products to be sold or furnished under the applicable conditions for exemption.
Common questions
Were ordinary general-purpose cleaning products covered?
The letter addressed patient-skin care and pre-treatment hospital hand cleansers, not every cleaning product.
Why is the issue date August 26 rather than August 21?
August 26, 1991 is printed on the supporting opinion; August 21 appears on the annotation.
Citations and references
- California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6369 and Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591(a) and (b)(1) — prescription-medicine classification and sale conditions
- Purdue Frederick Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 218 Cal.App.3d 1021, 267 Cal. Rptr. 482 — pre-treatment hospital hand-cleanser decision applied in the letter
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/425-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/425-0248.pdf
Original ruling text
425.0248
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 324-3828
August 26, 1991
Mr. J--- -. T--Acting Chief, Rate Development Branch
[XYZ]
XXX/XXX --- Street
---, California XXXXX-XXXX
RE:
Taxability of Cleansing Agents
SR -- XX-XXXXXX
Dear Mr. T---:
I am responding to your letter to me of July 18, 1991, in which you requested advice as to the applicability of the Sales and Use Tax Law to sales of products used to clean stomas and human feces from skin or to prevent skin sores and rashes. You have requested this information in order to determine if Medi-Cal should add and reimburse sales tax to claims received from providers for these products. OPINION Section 6369 interpreted and implemented by Title 28, California Code of Regulations, regulation 1591 provides that sales of medicines, when prescribed and sold or furnished under certain conditions for the treatment of a human being, are exempt from sales or use tax. (Reg. 1591(a). Subdivision (b)(1) of Regulation 1591 defines “medicines” to “mean and include any substances or preparation intended for use by external or internal application to the human body in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease and which is commonly recognized as a substance or preparation intended for such use.” We have consistently held that products which cleanse the skin, treat skin disorders, or prevent adverse skin conditions are “medicines” within the meaning of the regulation. Additionally, the court in Purdue Frederick Co. v. St. Bd. of Equalization (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 1021, 267 Cal. Rptr. 482, held that the exemption also applied to cleansers when hospital personnel used them to wash their hands prior to treating patients. We thus conclude that the products you mention are “medicines” the sales of which are exempt from tax.
Mr. J--- -. T---
-2-
August 26, 1991
425.0248
For your information, I have enclosed a copy of Board of Equalization Pamphlet No. 45, “Hospitals,” which includes a copy of Regulation 1591, and, on page 18, examples of items considered to be exempt medicines. I hope the above discussion has answered your question. If you need anything further, please do not hesitate to write again. Sincerely,
John L. Waid
Tax Counsel
JLW:es
4027I
Enclosure:
Pamphlet No. 45
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1991. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace