Were cast shoes, cast sandals, and post-operative shoes exempt orthotic devices in California?

Short answer No. California taxed the described footwear because it was not an integral part of a leg brace or artificial foot and did not otherwise qualify under the stated exception.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 425.0229.015
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1992-05-28
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Seller seeking tax treatment for listed medical supplies

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1992
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This May 28, 1992 multi-product staff opinion addressed the described cast shoes, cast sandal, and post-operative shoes. The official annotation page says 'artificial foot,' while the supporting letter visibly prints 'artificial food' twice; this page follows the annotation's product meaning and preserves the letter verbatim below. CDTFA says statutory law controls if it conflicts with an annotation. Integration with a brace or prosthesis, custom manufacture, product design, and current law can change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California treated the described cast shoes, cast sandals, and post-operative shoes as taxable. Regulation 1591(b)(4) excluded orthopedic shoes and foot-support devices from orthotic-device treatment unless they met a stated exception, such as being an integral part of a leg brace or artificial foot or qualifying as custom-made biomechanical foot orthoses.

The opinion said the cast shoes and post-operative shoes were not part of a leg brace or artificial foot, and the cast sandal was not part of a leg brace. They therefore did not qualify for the exemption.

Common questions

Did medical or post-operative use by itself make the footwear exempt?

No. The products also had to meet the orthotic-device exception described in the regulation.

Why does the original text below say “artificial food”?

That wording is visibly printed in the supporting letter. The official annotation summary uses “artificial foot,” which matches the surrounding footwear and prosthesis context.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6369 — medical-item exemption framework identified in the letter
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591(b)(4) — orthotic-device and foot-support rule applied to the products

Source

Original ruling text

425.0229.015

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 324-3828

May 28, 1992

Ms. K--- K--XXXX --- Road
P.O. Box XXXXX
---, VI XXXXX-XXXX
Re:

EF -- XX-XXXXXX
Sales of Medical Supplies

Dear Ms K---:

I am responding to your letter to me of March 27, 1992. You asked for advice regarding the sales and use tax status of specific medical items, following up on my letter to you of March 17, 1992, a copy of which you attached to your letter. OPINION In my letter I discussed the principles governing the exemption from sales and use tax for the sales of medical items as provided in Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6369, interpreted and implemented by Regulation 1591. For the sake of brevity, I will not repeat that discussion here. Our opinion regarding the status of the individual products at issue is as follows: (1)

Wrist and Forearm Splint, Finger Splint, Finger Immobilizer.

Although, as I noted in my letter, splints are excluded from the definition of “medicines” under Regulation 1591(c)(2), certain kinds of splints – which act as a support of brace for the body structure and not simply immobilize bones to allow a fracture to heal are considered orthotic devices the sale of which are exempt from tax under Regulation 1591(b)(4). We have previously considered that the splint which you describe operates to immobilize joints and support the bones while they heal. Indeed, the description of the Finger Protector states that it immobilizes injured fingers. Sales of such products are exempt from tax.

Ms. K--- K---

(2)

-2-

May 28, 1992
425.0229.015

Cast Sandals and Post-Op Shoes.

Regulation 1591(b)(4) excludes orthopedic shoes or supportive devices for the foot from the definition of “orthotic devices” unless “they are an integral part of a leg brace or artificial food or ‘custom-made biomechanical foot orthoses.’” We have previously concluded that cast shoes and post-operative shoes are not part of a leg brace or artificial food and so do not qualify for the exemption. The cast sandal is also not part of leg brace and so does not qualify. Sales of these items are subject to tax. (3) PVP Iodine Prep Solution and Scrub Solution, Acu-dyne Ointment, Eucerin Skin Lotion, Cream Skin Care. Products used for cleansing, and otherwise caring for the skin of patients protecting, and otherwise treating skin disorders or preventing adverse skin conditions have long been considered to be “medicines.” Sales of the listed items are exempt from tax. (4) Vaseline Lotion. You listed this product, but the attachments did not describe its use. See discussion under Item (3). (5)

E-Z Scrubbrush w/Hibiclens and Scrubbrush w/Iodophar.

Sales of cleansers used by physicians to scrub up prior surgery are exempt from tax pursuant to the court’s decision in Purdue Frederick Co. v. S.B.E. (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 1021. The description is unclear if the brushes are sold impregnated with the cleanser or not. Brushes sold separately are not exempt from tax, but if they are sold impregnated with a preparation recognized as a medicine, they do qualify for the exemption in which case their sales would be exempt from tax. (6)

Insulin Syringes.

Sales of such items are exempt only when furnished by a registered pharmacist to a person for treatment of diabetes as directed by a physician under Regulation 1591(h). Sales to hospitals for use on patients while in the hospital do not qualify; such sales are taxable. (7) Immobilizers. As noted above, such items immobilize joints and support the bones while they heal. They are to be distinguished from items which merely hold in place the pieces resulting from a bone fracture and permit them to properly knit together. Sales of the latter items are subject to tax.

Ms. K--- K---

-3-

May 28, 1992
425.0229.015

I hope the above discussion has answered your question. If you need anything further, please do not hesitate to write again. Sincerely,

John L. Waid
Tax Counsel

JWL:es

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1992. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace