When were a state department's manuals, public-record copies, and traffic-accident photograph reprints taxable?

Short answer Required copies furnished after a specific Public Records Act request were nontaxable, while documents designed for ordinary public sale were taxable absent such a request. Traffic-photo reprints were nontaxable to the requester, but the agency's vendor purchase was taxable and no tax could be separately stated.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 420.0085
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1980-08-15
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A California state department asking about manuals, guides, and traffic-accident photograph reprints (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1980. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1980
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an August 15, 1980 California State Board of Equalization Legal memorandum published by CDTFA to support a sales and use tax annotation. Documents it refers to, such as the request or supporting records, are not published with it. It answers a redacted department under then-cited Public Records Act and Regulation 1528(a)(2) rules. Its prior Board conclusion is unidentified. CDTFA's current annotation adds propositions not stated in those words in the source. CDTFA says statutory law controls over an inconsistent annotation. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A redacted state department sold procedure manuals, guides and orders primarily for internal or allied-agency use; manuals and handbooks intended for public sale and use; and traffic-accident photograph reprints. It said the documents generally were public records, while acknowledging that some were designed for public sale.

Legal staff quoted Regulation 1528(a)(2): tax did not apply to charges for securing and delivering copies a public agency was legally required to furnish to the general public. The memorandum said the Board previously concluded that a public agency's copies requested under the California Public Records Act were nontaxable, but did not identify that earlier opinion.

A document's general status as a public record was not enough. Documents designed for public sale and informational use remained taxable when they were not furnished because of a specific Public Records Act request. The source does not separately resolve every internal or allied-agency manual described in the facts.

Traffic-accident photograph reprints were treated as nontaxable required copies under Regulation 1528(a)(2). The department's vendor sale of the reprints to the department was taxable. The agency could build that cost into its public charge but could not separately label an amount as tax or tax reimbursement when furnishing the reprints.

Source posture and live annotation

The memorandum answers a July 10, 1980 department memorandum about publications and a separate July 10 supplemental memorandum about traffic-accident reprints; neither request is included. The source supplies no department identity, publication title, requester, specific records request, quantity, fee, vendor, invoice, tax amount, return, audit or later outcome. It prints Public records Act once and California Public Act once; those source defects remain verbatim below.

The live 420.0085 annotation, in the 2026 revision of the Business Taxes Law Guide, retains the three property categories, specific-request distinction, public-sale-manual conclusion, nontaxable traffic-photo reprints, taxable acquisition cost, no separate tax statement and August 15, 1980 date. It says traffic-photo requests are pursuant to the Public Records Acts, while the source does not state that factual premise in those words; instead it applies Regulation 1528(a)(2) directly. The live page also says the agency should pay vendor tax reimbursement or use tax, while the source says only that tax applied to the vendor purchase. It omits the internal memorandum posture, quoted regulation, unidentified prior conclusion, source errors, missing requests and absent transaction records.

CDTFA's Annotated Legal Opinions collection says the letters are summarized as annotations and that statutory law controls whenever a statute and annotation conflict. The official two-page PDF has a clean native text layer and no embedded images, so no OCR was required. Both fresh direct PDF downloads and both live-page downloads were byte-identical, duplicate default PDF text extractions matched, and the original-text section remains byte-identical to its committed version and fresh extraction after removal of only the extractor's terminal newline and form feed.

What this means for you

Public agencies and tax professionals

Do not treat every public record or agency publication as nontaxable merely because it is government-held. Under this historical memorandum, document the legal copy duty and the specific records request. Separately identify ordinary public-sale publications, the agency's taxable acquisition costs, the charge to the requester, and whether any amount is separately labeled as tax.

Common questions

Q: Was public-record status by itself enough to make a manual sale nontaxable?

A: No. The source distinguished a copy furnished because of a specific Public Records Act request from a document designed and sold for ordinary public information.

Q: Were traffic-accident photograph reprints taxable to the requester?

A: No. The memorandum applied Regulation 1528(a)(2) and treated the department's furnishing of those reprints as nontaxable.

Q: Was the department's purchase from its reprint vendor taxable?

A: Yes. The department could include that tax cost in its public charge but could not separately label an amount as tax or tax reimbursement.

Q: Did the source decide every internal or allied-agency manual sale?

A: No. It described that category but expressly applied the taxable conclusion to documents designed for public sale when no specific Public Records Act request caused the sale.

Q: Did CDTFA's live page add anything?

A: Yes. It says traffic-photo requests were under the Public Records Act and specifies vendor reimbursement or use tax; the memorandum itself applies Regulation 1528(a)(2) and says only that tax applied to the vendor purchase.

Citations and references

  • Former California Government Code section 6250 et seq. — cited as the California Public Records Act
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1528(a)(2) — quoted for legally required public-agency copies
  • July 10, 1980 memorandum and supplemental memorandum; unidentified earlier Board conclusion; department identity; publication titles; requests; records; quantities; fees; vendor invoices; tax amounts; returns; audits; and outcomes — described or implicated but not included

Verbatim support

From the official August 15, 1980 Legal memorandum:

Tax does apply to the sale of documents designed for public sale and use which are sold for informational purposes and not because of a specific request pursuant to the California Public Records Act.

Under Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1528 (a) (2), tax would not apply to your sale of traffic accident photograph reprints. Tax would apply to your purchase of the reprints from your vendor.

You may build the cost of the tax into your charges to the public for the reprints however. You may not, however, separately state an amount labeled tax, tax reimbursement or the like when you sell the photographic reprints.

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

420.0085

To:

X------------------------------

From:

Mary C. Armstrong
Legal

Subject:

Sale of Departmental Manuals and Photograph Reprints
X------------------------

Date:

August 15, 1980

Your memorandum of July 10, 1980 to X---------------- has been referred to the legal staff for reply. Your inquiry concerns the correct application of tax to your department’s sale of certain publications. We understand that your department sells procedure manuals, guides and orders primarily intended for internal or allied agency use and manuals and handbooks intended for public sale and use. You note that generally speaking all these documents are public records as defined in the Public records Act (Government Code Section 6250 et seq.) although some of the documents are designed for public sale and use. Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1528 (a)(2) provides in part that: “…The tax does not apply to charges for securing from a public agency and delivering copies of records which the public agency is by law required to furnish to the general public….” We have previously concluded that tax does not apply when a public agency sells copies of documents requested pursuant to the California Public Act. Tax does apply to the sale of documents designed for public sale and use which are sold for informational purposes and not because of a specific request pursuant to the California Public Records Act.


In a supplemental memorandum, also dated July 10, 1980, you requested confirmation of the procedure to follow when selling traffic accident photograph reprints to members of the public. Under Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1528 (a) (2), tax would not apply to your sale of traffic accident photograph reprints. Tax would apply to your purchase of the reprints from your

vendor. You may build the cost of the tax into your charges to the public for the reprints however. You may not, however, separately state an amount labeled tax, tax reimbursement or the like when you sell the photographic reprints. MCA:ba

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1980. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace