What California resale-certificate information had to appear on an autographed sports memorabilia certificate of authenticity?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
California's 1995 memorabilia-law amendment required a certificate of authenticity to show the last four digits of the dealer's Board resale-certificate number. The statute also barred a person from representing themselves as a California dealer without a valid resale-certificate number.
The Board did not enforce or administer the autographed-sports-memorabilia law itself. It did, however, have responsibility for sales-tax compliance by memorabilia sellers in California.
After receiving information about a planned Los Angeles-area event with potentially unregistered out-of-state dealers, counsel forwarded the matter to compliance staff to take any steps they considered appropriate. The memorandum does not record a later enforcement result.
Statutory amendment and wording difference
Assistant Chief Counsel Gary J. Jugum said the 1995 amendment, AB 434, added Board references to the autographed-sports-memorabilia law. The memo quotes Civil Code section 1739.7(b)(6) as requiring a certificate of authenticity to indicate the last four digits of the dealer's Board resale-certificate number.
The next quoted sentence in the PDF says no person may represent themselves as a California dealer unless they processes a valid resale certificate number. The live 410.0011 annotation instead says possesses, which fits the sentence grammatically. This page reports the live wording difference but preserves processes in the original source text. AB 434 and the enacted statutory copy are not attached to the memo.
The Board disclaimed enforcement or administration of the authenticity law itself. Jugum nonetheless said the agency had sales-tax enforcement responsibilities for people selling memorabilia at California locations.
Reported future event and discretionary referral
A redacted informant reportedly believed a major future Los Angeles-area event would include many out-of-state memorabilia dealers, believed such dealers generally lacked Board registration, and said their participation disadvantaged registered California businesses.
Those statements are presented as the informant's beliefs, not verified registration findings. The source identifies no event, date, venue, organizer, dealer, registration search, memorabilia, sale or California business.
Jugum sent the information to Compliance Program Manager Sue Coty for whatever steps she thought appropriate, if any, and gave the informant her contact details. The memo supplies no follow-up information, event occurrence, registration, return, tax, assessment or enforcement action.
Live annotation and source limits
The live annotation retains the four-digit certificate rule, valid-number dealer requirement, Board nonadministration of the memorabilia law and general sales-tax enforcement role. It omits AB 434, the processes/possesses conflict, reported event, informant's unverified beliefs, California-business concern, discretionary referral and absence of an outcome.
The official one-page PDF has a clean rendered text layer and no image or case citation. Both fresh downloads and extractions matched, and the original-text tail remains byte-identical after removing only pdftotext's terminal newline and form feed.
What this means for you
Memorabilia dealers, event organizers, and tax professionals
Keep authenticity documents and tax registration aligned. Out-of-state event participation can create California seller-registration and sales-tax obligations even when a separate agency administers product-authenticity law.
Common questions
Q: What number appeared on the authenticity certificate?
A: The last four digits of the dealer's resale-certificate number.
Q: Did the Board administer the memorabilia statute?
A: No.
Q: What role did the Board retain?
A: Enforcing California sales-tax obligations for sellers at in-state locations.
Q: Did the source and live annotation use the same word for dealer status?
A: No. The PDF prints processes a valid resale certificate number; the live annotation says possesses.
Q: Were the out-of-state dealers shown to be unregistered?
A: No. That was the informant's stated belief, and the source includes no dealer list or registration checks.
Q: What enforcement action followed?
A: The referral allowed whatever steps the compliance manager thought appropriate, if any; no result is supplied.
Citations and references
- California Civil Code § 1739.7 and § 1739.7(b)(6) — dealer-number and certificate requirement described and partly quoted
- California Assembly Bill 434 — 1995 amendment identified but not attached
- Informant and report; future event, date, venue and organizer; out-of-state and California dealers; registration checks; memorabilia and authenticity certificates; sales and prices; returns; tax measure and rate; compliance steps; assessment; payment; appeal and outcome — described or implicated but not included
Verbatim support
From the official May 3, 1996 memorandum:
That law now provides that certificates of authenticity must “indicate the last four digits of the dealer’s resale certificate number from the State Board of Equalization.” Civ. Code § 1739.7(b)(6).
It is his belief that the out-of-state dealers generally are not registered to pay sales tax, to the detriment of competing California-based businesses.
We are furnishing this information to you to take such steps as you may think appropriate, if any, to ensure proper enforcement of the California Sales Tax Law.
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: CDTFA Annotated Legal Opinions
- Live annotation: Annotation 410.0011
- Original supporting opinion: 410.0011 PDF
Original ruling text
State of California
Board of Equalization
Memorandum
To:
Ms. Sue Coty
Compliance Program Manager
From:
Gary J. Jugum
Assistant Chief Counsel
Subject:
Autographed Sports Memorabilia
410.0011
Date:
May 3, 1996
The Civil Code provisions dealing with autographed sports memorabilia were amended in 1995 to make reference to the State Board of Equalization. See Civil Code section 1739.7; AB 434. That law now provides that certificates of authenticity must “indicate the last four digits of the dealer’s resale certificate number from the State Board of Equalization.” Civ. Code
§ 1739.7(b)(6). The law further provides that “no person shall represent himself or herself as a dealer in this state unless he or she processes a valid resale certificate number from the State Board of Equalization.” This agency does not enforce or administer the autographed sports memorabilia law. However, we do have the duty to ensure that persons selling sports memorabilia at locations in this state properly pay California sales tax. We have been advised by a Mr. [X] that a major sports memorabilia event will be held in the near future in the Los Angeles area. It is his belief that a large number of out-of-state dealers will be making sales of autographed memorabilia at that event. It is his belief that the out-of-state dealers generally are not registered to pay sales tax, to the detriment of competing California-based businesses. We are furnishing this information to you to take such steps as you may think appropriate, if any, to ensure proper enforcement of the California Sales Tax Law. We have given your name and telephone number to Mr. [X] should he wish to provide this agency with more information in regard to the event in question. GJJ:sr cc:
Mr. Glenn A. Bystrom - MIC:43
Mr. Dennis Fox - MIC:92
Mr. David H. Levine
Mr. Ronald L. Dick
Sales and Use Tax Attorneys
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1996. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace