Did a museum's proposed free school-tour program satisfy section 6365(d)(3)'s free-admission requirement?

Short answer Yes. Free admission for secondary students one morning a week through a planned school program qualified; free admission for under-12 children conditioned on an adult's paid admission did not.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 390.0095
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1979-04-04
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Counsel for an unidentified California nonprofit museum

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1979. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1979
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This April 4, 1979 California Board of Equalization Legal Counsel opinion answers an unpublished counsel letter and addresses only section 6365(d)(3)'s no-charge population-segment requirement. Counsel represented that sections 6365(a) through (c) were satisfied; the agency did not verify or decide them. The favorable result concerns a developing school program, although the conclusion calls it a practice, and no implementation or later outcome appears. Another museum should not rely on it as binding and should check current museum-definition, nonprofit, qualification, admission, student-program, reproduction-sale, sales-tax, and use-tax law. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Counsel described a California nonprofit museum incorporated in 1924 under a redacted name and renamed several times. It held federal section 501(c)(3) status, classification as a publicly supported charity under section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi), and a California income-tax determination under section 23701d. Its public museum showed its own and borrowed art in a 1969 building on land leased long-term for nominal rent.

The museum then opened Thursday through Sunday from noon to 6 p.m. Adult admission was $2; senior and student admission was $0.75; and children under 12 entered free with a responsible adult. Each paid admission included a free art reproduction identified in an absent exhibit. Membership classes included free admission and other benefits. Groups of 20 to 200 could obtain guided tours while the museum was closed to the general public for approximately $3 per person.

The museum was developing a prearranged school-group program with free admission, an educational guided tour, and a free reproduction of exhibited art. It would prioritize public secondary-school students, initially from one district and later possibly others. Transportation, trained guides, and release from class required advance scheduling. One morning—probably Friday—would be set aside each school week, with about 150 children per visit and graduate art-history students trained and hired by the museum as guides.

Counsel represented that the museum met section 6365(a) through (c) and asked only how it met subsection (d). Section 6365(d)(3), as quoted, included a museum open to a segment of the student or adult population without charge.

Legal Counsel Mary C. Armstrong concluded that free admission for secondary students one morning a week through the planned school program qualified. The relevant segment was every secondary-school-age child in the identified district. But admitting children under 12 only with a responsible adult did not independently qualify because their free admission depended on a paid admission and therefore was not truly free.

Source and live-annotation limits

The official PDF does not include the February 9 request, incorporation or name-history documents, federal or California exemption determinations, public-support classification, land lease, building or museum records, art collection or loan records, admission tickets or receipts, attached reproduction exhibit, membership terms, tour bookings, transportation, student-release records, school or district agreements, program schedules or attendance, guide training or employment records, proof under section 6365(a) through (c), sales or uses, returns, exemption documentation, tax calculations or payments, audit, assessment, claim, appeal, or later outcome. Counsel, the museum, former names, site, landowner, school district, schools, students, adults, members, patrons, guides, art, reproductions, transactions, quantities beyond described group capacity, and amounts beyond stated admissions and tour price are redacted, unidentified, proposed, or undocumented.

The source describes a program the museum is developing and is proposing, then calls the qualifying arrangement a practice in its conclusion. It documents no actual school visit. It also prints Museum in not open; the original-text section preserves that published wording.

The live annotation identifies the redacted initial district as Pasadena School District and frames the school arrangement as a practice. The supporting opinion does not supply that name and elsewhere describes the program as developing. The live annotation preserves the weekly secondary-student program, population-segment rule, under-12 policy, paid-admission condition, date, and two conclusions. It omits the request and counsel, museum history and tax classifications, building and lease, art, days and hours, prices, reproduction and membership benefits, paid group tours, program logistics and expansion, 150-student estimate, graduate-student guides, counsel's sections 6365(a)-through-(c) representation, requester arguments, missing records, redaction and source wording, and absent implementation and outcome.

What this means for you

Museums, schools, nonprofits, and tax professionals

Preserve every statutory qualification, exemption determination, admission policy and price, tickets and receipts, any linked adult charge, membership and reproduction benefits, school and district agreements, program eligibility, schedules, transportation and class-release arrangements, guides, attendance, sales and uses, returns, exemption documents, tax calculations, and payments. A no-charge admission conditioned on someone else's paid ticket is not the same as an independently free population segment.

Common questions

Did the weekly school program meet the free-admission requirement?

Yes.

Did free admission for children under 12 also qualify?

No, because it was conditioned on a responsible adult's paid admission.

Did California decide every requirement of the museum exemption?

No. The question presented concerned section 6365(d)(3).

What were the museum's ordinary admission prices?

$2 for adults and $0.75 for senior citizens and students; children under 12 entered free with a responsible adult.

What did each paid admission include?

A free reproduction, but the referenced exhibit is absent from the published PDF.

How large was the proposed student visit?

About 150 children, with graduate art-history students trained and hired by the museum as guides.

Was the school program already operating?

The factual description says it was developing and proposed. The conclusion calls it a practice, but the source documents no completed visit.

Did the opinion verify sections 6365(a) through (c)?

No. Counsel represented that the museum met them.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code §§ 6365(a)–(d)(3) and 23701d
  • Internal Revenue Code §§ 501(c)(3) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi)
  • February 9 request; paid-admission reproduction exhibit; incorporation, exemption, lease, museum, admission, membership, tour, school-program, and qualification records; and outcome — described or implicated but not documented

Verbatim support

From the official Legal Counsel opinion:

We are of the opinion that the museum's practice of admitting secondary school students free of charge one morning a week as part of a planned school program qualifies within the meaning of the term "a museum which is open to a segment of the student... population without charge ... "

The fact that the free admission for children under 12 is conditioned on a paid admission results in it not being truly a free admission as Section 6365 (d)(3) requires.

Source

Original ruling text

390.0095

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
916-445-3237

April 4, 1979

REDACTED TEXT

Dear Mr. REDACTED TEXT
Your letter of February 9, 1979 to Mr. Thomas P. Putman, Assistant Chief Counsel, has been referred to the undersigned for reply. You have requested our interpretation of Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6365 as it applies to the above referenced client. Specifically you wish to know whether the admissions policy of the REDACTED TEXT ("Museum") will satisfy the requirements of Section 6365 (d) (3). As we understand it, "The Museum is a California non-profit corporation incorporated in 1924 under the name of REDACTED TEXT. During its long history, the corporation has had several names, including REDACTED TEXT and currently REDACTED TEXT. The Museum is exempt from federal income tax under Section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 as amended ("IRC") and has been classified as a publicly supported charitable organization under IRC Section 170 (b) (1) (A) (vi). The Museum also has been determined to be exempt from California income tax under Section 23701d of the California Revenue and Taxation Code ("RTC"). The Museum operates a public museum at REDACTED TEXT. The present museum building was constructed in 1969 on land leased on a long-term basis at a nominal rental from REDACTED TEXT. The Museum exhibits to the public both its own collection of art works and art works which are loaned to it. "The present admission policy of the Museum is as follows. The Museum is open to the public each week of the year for four days, Thursday through Sunday. The admission hours on these days are from noon to 6:00 p.m. Admission charges are as follows: Adults - $2.00; Senior Citizens and Students - $ .75; Children under 12 are admitted free when accompanied by a responsible adult. Each paid admission (whether
$2.00 or $.75) is entitled to a free reproduction (exhibit attached). In addition, there are several classes of memberships available which entitle members to free admission as well as other benefits. Guided tours are

available for groups of 20-200 at times when the Museum in not open to the general public at an approximate price schedule of $3.00 per person. "The museum is developing a program which would bring students to the Museum in groups at prearranged times and give them free admission and an educational guided tour of the Museum, along with a free reproduction from art on exhibition. The program would give priority to secondary school students in public schools. Because of the necessity to arrange transportation, tour guides and release from regularly scheduled classwork for the students, this program would require that the activities be scheduled well in advance. The Museum is proposing to set aside one morning (probably Friday) each week of the school year for this program. Although it is anticipated that the program will initially involve the REDACTED TEXT School District, the museum expects to expand the program to include other school districts which may be interested. It is anticipated that approximately 150 children could be accommodated for each visit. Tour guides for the school children's tours would be graduate art history students who are trained at the museum and hired by the Museum to conduct the tours." You state that you feel "that the Museum meets all of the applicable requirements of RTC Sections 6365(a) through (c). The question remaining to be answered is the manner in which the Museum satisfies the requirements of Section 6365(d)." Specifically you wish to know whether the Museum's policy of admitting children under 12 free when accompanied by a responsible adult together with its proposed program providing free admission and tours to school children one day each week of the school year satisfy the requirement of RTC Section 6365(d)(3) that the Museum be "open to a segment of the student or adult population without charge"? You feel that the "foregoing admissions policy clearly satisfies the literal requirements of Section 6365(d)(3) in that it undeniably opens the Museum to a segment of the student population without charge. You state that you do not, however, rely on a strictly literal interpretation of the section. While the term "a segment" could be defined quite narrowly, the Museum has not done so. The policy of admitting children under 12 in effect provides free admission for nearly all elementary school students. The requirement that such children be accompanied by a responsible adult is not a significant practical constraint, since most children of that age would require transportation to and from the Museum by an adult in any event. Moreover, children of that age require some supervision in the Museum to avoid possible damage to the Museum facilities and art on display and disturbance of other Museum patrons. In summary, you feel that the Museum's practice of admitting children under 12 free of charge when accompanied by an adult and admitting secondary school children free of charge when they are part of your special tour program qualified under Section 6365(d)(3) as a "museum which is open to a segment of the student or adult population without charge."

Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6365(d)(3) provides as follows: "(d) For purposes of this section, a 'museum' shall only include: "(3) A museum which is open to a segment of the student or adult population without charge... " We are of the opinion that the museum's practice of admitting secondary school students free of charge one morning a week as part of a planned school program qualifies within the meaning of the term "a museum which is open to a segment of the student... population without charge ... " The "segment" in this case would be all secondary school age children in the REDACTED TEXT School District. The fact that the museum also allows free admission to children under 12 when they are accompanied by an adult would not in our opinion qualify as being open to a segment of the student population without charge. The fact that the free admission for children under 12 is conditioned on a paid admission results in it not being truly a free admission as Section 6365 (d)(3) requires. If you have further questions concerning this matter, please write this office again. Very truly yours, Mary C. Armstrong Legal Counsel MCA:ba bc:

Audit Evaluation & Planning Unit
Pasadena - District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1979. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace