Did a newsletter sent every four to six weeks qualify as an exempt periodical when it lacked a stated, regular publication schedule?

Short answer No on its current schedule. Four-to-six-week issuance was not a stated, regular interval; a regular schedule would qualify.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 385.1335
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1976-09-15
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Redacted publisher of a newsletter for local transcendental-meditation practitioners

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1976. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1976
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This September 15, 1976 California Board of Equalization Tax Counsel letter answers an unpublished request about a redacted newsletter; only CDTFA's current annotation identifies Berkeley Center News and Berkeley World Plan Center. Documents it refers to, such as the request or supporting records, are not published with it. Its denial rests only on the then-current schedule, and later guidance warns that periodical status alone stopped establishing exemption. Another publisher should not rely on it as binding and should check current periodical, schedule, distribution, subscription, sales-tax, and use-tax law. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A redacted publisher's September 1, 1976 letter asked whether its newsletter qualified for sales-tax exemption under former section 6362 and Regulation 1590. The newsletter went every four to six weeks to local practitioners of the transcendental-meditation program.

Regulation 1590 limited periodicals to publications appearing at stated intervals with general-interest news or information. Exemption also required regular issuance at average intervals no longer than three months.

Tax Counsel Gary J. Jugum found that the redacted newsletter appeared neither at stated intervals nor with required regularity. It did not qualify on its then-current schedule. Counsel said it would qualify if issued regularly, making schedule the stated failure rather than subject matter. No later schedule, transaction, tax amount, or outcome appears.

Later authority and source limits

A February 5, 2002 official staff email published with Annotation 385.0920 warns that, under then-current section 6362.7 and Regulation 1590, periodicals were no longer exempt unless sold by subscription and delivered by mail or common carrier, or covered by another exemption such as nonprofit distribution. The 1976 letter does not address that later regime.

The official 385.1335 PDF does not include the September 1 request, newsletter or any issue, title or publisher identity, article or author records, publication or delivery schedule beyond the four-to-six-week description, recipient or organization records, prices or invoices, sales, distributions, subscriptions, returns, exemption documentation, tax calculations or payments, audit, assessment, claim, appeal, later regular schedule, or outcome. The publisher, publication, practitioners, recipients, transactions, and amounts are redacted or unidentified.

The PDF metadata labels the document 385.1338, while the official body, source URL, and live page identify 385.1335. This page follows the body without altering or silently resolving the metadata conflict.

The live annotation preserves the unstated-interval failure, Regulation 1590, nonexempt result, and date. It adds the Berkeley Center News and Berkeley World Plan Center names. It omits the request, every-four-to-six-weeks schedule, local transcendental-meditation recipients, section 6362 and complete interval rules, lack-of-regularity finding, schedule-only and future-qualification statements, PDF metadata conflict, later 2002 warning, missing records, redactions, and absent outcome.

What this means for you

Newsletter publishers and tax professionals

Frequency alone is not enough. Preserve every newsletter and issue, stated and actual publication and delivery calendars, content, authors, publisher and recipient records, distribution, subscriptions, invoices, sales, returns, exemption documentation, tax calculations, and payments.

Common questions

Q: Was every four to six weeks frequent enough?

A: It was within three months, but the newsletter still lacked stated, regular intervals.

Q: Was its subject matter disqualifying?

A: No. The opinion based the denial on scheduling.

Q: Could the publication later qualify?

A: Yes, if issued on a regular schedule.

Q: Did the supporting letter identify Berkeley Center News?

A: No. It redacts the newsletter and publisher; the live annotation supplies both names.

Q: Does the PDF metadata match the annotation?

A: No. The metadata says 385.1338, while the body, URL, and live page say 385.1335.

Citations and references

  • Former California Revenue and Taxation Code § 6362
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1590
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code § 6362.7 and Regulation 1590 — discussed in the February 5, 2002 staff email published with Annotation 385.0920
  • Request, newsletters and issues, schedules, recipients, distribution, transactions, tax records, and outcome — described or implicated but not documented

Verbatim support

From the official Tax Counsel letter:

We understand that your newsletter is sent out every four to six weeks to local practitioners of the transcendental meditation program.

It appears that --- is not issued at stated intervals nor with the regularity required by the regulation.

If the publication were issued on a regular schedule, the publication would qualify for exemption.

Source

Original ruling text

385.1335

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

(916) 445-2641

September 15, 1976

--- ----- --- --This is in response to your letter of September 1, 1976. You have raised a question as to whether your newsletter --- qualifies for exemption from the sales tax pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6362 and our Regulation 1590 “Newspapers and Periodicals.” We understand that your newsletter is sent out every four to six weeks to local practitioners of the transcendental meditation program. Regulation 1590 provides that the term “periodical” is limited to those publications which appear at stated intervals, each issue of which contains news or information of general interest to the public, or to some particular organization or group of persons. To qualify for exemption a publication must be regularly issued at average intervals not exceeding three months. It appears that --- is not issued at stated intervals nor with the regularity required by the regulation. Consequently, your publication does not qualify for exemption from the tax based upon its schedule of publication at this time. If the publication were issued on a regular schedule, the publication would qualify for exemption.

Very truly yours,

Gary J. Jugum
Tax Counsel

J: alicetilton
bc: Oakland – District Administration

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1976. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace