How did California tax lump-sum solar-window tinting and vinyl pinstriping on buildings, vehicles, boats, and aircraft?

Short answer Building work made the installer a consumer of assumed materials; vehicle pinstriping was nontaxable, while used-window tinting followed repair rules.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 315.0770
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1992-08-25
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A business applying solar tint and vinyl pinstriping to buildings and vehicles

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1992
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This 1992 opinion assumed the real-property products were materials rather than fixtures, the vehicle, vessel, and aircraft windows were already components of used property, and customers received lump-sum invoices. Different products, title terms, new property, separate charges, or material values could change the result. Current construction, fixture, repair, installation, parts, permit, and tax-paid-resale rules control today.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

For commercial storefronts and homes, California assumed the tinting and pinstriping products became construction materials rather than fixtures. The installer was their consumer, tax applied to its purchase or use of the materials, and no further sales or use tax applied to the lump-sum construction contract.

For cars, boats, and aircraft, lump-sum pinstriping charges were nontaxable, and the installer properly paid tax when buying the applied property. Tinting windows already installed in used vehicles, vessels, or aircraft was repair work.

Under the repair rule, if tint material was no more than ten percent of the total lump-sum charge and not separately charged, the installer consumed it and the customer charge was not taxable. If its fair retail value exceeded ten percent, the installer was its retailer, needed a seller's permit, and owed tax on the fair retail selling price, with a possible tax-paid-purchases-resold deduction.

Common questions

Was lump-sum building tint taxable to the customer?

No, under the source's materials assumption; the contractor paid tax on the materials.

Was vehicle pinstriping taxable?

No, under the described lump-sum treatment.

Did used-vehicle tinting always remain nontaxable?

No. Material value above ten percent made the installer a retailer of the tint material.

Citations and references

  • California Code of Regulations, title 18, Regulations 1521, 1546, and 1701

Source

Original ruling text

315.0770

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

WILLIAM M. BENNETT
First District, Kentfield

1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 445-5550

BRAD SHERMAN
Second District, Los Angeles
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
MATTHEW K. FONG
Fourth District, Los Angeles

August 25, 1992

GRAY DAVIS
Controller, Sacramento

BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director

Mr. F--- S--- C--A--- A--XXX --- --- Drive
--- ---, California XXXXX
Re: SR --- XX-XXXXXX
Dear Mr. C---:
This is in response to your letter dated July 13, 1992 in which you ask whether sales tax applies to your business of applying solar window tinting and vinyl pinstriping. You apply the tinting and pinstriping to commercial store-front windows, homes, cars, boats, and airplanes. You state that you always pay sales tax to your vendors when you purchase the materials you need for a job. You bill your customers in a single lump sum, with no separate itemization of materials and labor. I will discuss the tinting and pinstriping of real property (commercial store-front windows and homes) first and then discuss application to tangible personal property (vehicles, vessels, and aircraft). Real Property When you tint or pinstripe real property, you are a construction contractor for purposes of sales and use taxes. Regulation 1521, a copy of which is enclosed, explains the application of tax to construction contracts. Generally, a construction contractor is the consumer of any materials he or she furnishes and installs onto real property and is the retailer of any fixtures he or she furnishes and installs onto real property. (Reg. 1521(b)(2).) "Materials" is defined to include property which loses its identity to become an integral and inseparable part of the real property. (Reg. 1521(a)(5) and Appendix A (list of typical items regarded as materials).) "Fixtures" is defined to include items which are accessory to a building or other structure and which do not lose their identity as accessories. (Reg. 1521(a)(5) and

Mr. F--- S--- C---

-2-

August 25, 1992
315.0770

Appendix B (list of typical items regarded as fixtures).)
You have not described the property that you furnish and install pursuant to your contracts. For purposes of this opinion, I assume that they are "materials" within the meaning of Regulation 1521. Based on this assumption and your description of your contracts, we conclude that you are the consumer of such property. The sale of the property to you, or your use of the property (by installing it onto real property), is subject to sales or use tax. There is no sales or use tax applicable to your construction contract with your customers. Since you pay sales tax (reimbursement) when purchasing this property, no further tax is due. Tangible personal property Tax does not apply to the charge for applying lettering to trucks or automobiles. (Business Taxes Law Guide Annot. 345.0040 (12/4/50).) This rule would also apply to lettering applied to vessels and aircraft. We have previously concluded that pinstriping on automobiles should be treated similarly to lettering applied to automobiles. This rule would again also apply to pinstriping of vessels and aircraft. Thus, your lump sum charges for pinstriping vehicles, vessels, and aircraft are not subject to tax. You are correct in paying sales tax (reimbursement) when purchasing the items you will apply as pinstriping. I assume that you are tinting windows that, at the time you perform the tinting, are component parts of used, rather than new, vehicles, vessels, and aircraft. Based on these assumptions, you are performing repairs. Regulation 1546, a copy of which is enclosed, discusses the proper application of tax to repairs. Since you make no separate charge for the property furnished in connection with the repairs (tinting), you are a consumer of such property if its retail value is 10 percent or less of your total charge to the customer. When such is the case, no tax applies to your charge for tinting and you are properly paying sales tax (reimbursement) when purchasing such property. On the other hand, when the retail value of the property you furnish in connection with the tinting is more than 10 percent of your total charge, you are a retailer of such property, and you must segregate on the invoices to your customers the fair retailing selling price of such property. If you do not make a segregation of the charge for the property you furnish, the Board will determine the fair retail selling price of the property based on the information available to us. I assume that the fair retail value of property you furnish when tinting windows on vehicles, vessels, or aircraft is sometimes more than 10 percent of your total charge. With respect to such transactions, you are a seller and must therefore hold a seller's permit. Although you owe sales tax on the sale to your customer measured by the fair retail value of the property you furnish, you are entitled to a deduction with respect to sales tax (reimbursement) you paid your vendor when purchasing the property. This is explained in Regulation 1701, a copy of

Mr. F--- S--- C---

-3-

August 25, 1992
315.0770

which is enclosed. The end result of this rule is that if you pay sale tax reimbursement when purchasing the property, you will owe tax on the net difference between the amount you paid and the fair retail selling price to your customer. If you have further questions, feel free to write again.

Sincerely,

David H. Levine
Senior Tax Counsel
DHL:cl
Enclosures (3)
bc:

--- --- District Administrator
Ms. Diane Mayer - --- ---

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1992. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace