Was a refundable deposit taxable when a customer received a reconditioned generator before returning the worn generator?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1950. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A retailer supplied a reconditioned automotive generator before the customer delivered the worn generator promised in exchange. If the transaction was clearly documented as an exchange, the deposit was entered separately in the retailer's books, the customer later returned the worn generator, and the retailer refunded the deposit, tax did not apply to the deposit.
If the customer did not return the worn generator, California treated the transaction as a straight sale. The retailer's retained deposit then became part of the full retail selling price, and tax applied to that full amount.
Common questions
Was a refunded exchange deposit taxable?
No, under the source's documented-exchange facts.
How did the retailer have to record it?
Separately as a deposit.
What if the worn generator was never returned?
The deposit became part of the taxable sales price.
Citations and references
The supporting opinion does not cite a specific statute or regulation.
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/315-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/315-0380.pdf
Original ruling text
315.0380
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
January 19, 1950
Mr. A--- K. D--XXXX I--- Street
---, California
Dear Sir:
This is in answer to your letter of January 17 with respect to the application of State slaes tax to an amount charged by a retailer as a deposit upon the exchange of a reconditioned automotive generator for a worn generator which is not immediately delivered to the retailer by the customer. We regret that through inadvertence your earlier inquiry with respect to this matter was unanswered.
It is our opinion that if the original transaction is clearly understood and designated to be an exchange, the tax will not apply to the amount of the deposit in the event that the customer does deliver the worn generator to the retailer and receives a refund of the deposit. The amount of the deposit should, of course, be entered separately in the retailer’s books as a deposit. In the event that the customer does not deliver the worn generator to the retailer pursuant to the exchange agreement, the transaction will be regarded as a straight sale of the reconditioned generator. In this event the retention of the deposit by the retailer will be regarded as an appropriation of the amount thereof to the payment of the retail sales price of the generator, which will be regarded as the full amount charged by the retailer, including the amount originally received as a deposit. The tax will apply, in this case, to the full retail sales price. Very truly yours,
R. G. Hamlin
Associate Tax Counsel
RGH:HB
cc:
H. B. Hoffman
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1950. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace