Was a refundable deposit taxable when a customer received a reconditioned generator before returning the worn generator?

Short answer No, if the transaction was a documented exchange and the refunded deposit was recorded separately; a retained deposit became part of the taxable sales price.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 315.0380
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1950-01-19
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A business asking about a deposit on an automotive-generator exchange
Topics

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1950. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1950
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This 1950 opinion required the original transaction to be clearly understood and designated as an exchange and the deposit to be entered separately in the retailer's books. Failure to return the worn generator converted the transaction into a straight sale. Current exchange, core-charge, deposit, refund, retail-price, invoicing, and recordkeeping rules control today.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A retailer supplied a reconditioned automotive generator before the customer delivered the worn generator promised in exchange. If the transaction was clearly documented as an exchange, the deposit was entered separately in the retailer's books, the customer later returned the worn generator, and the retailer refunded the deposit, tax did not apply to the deposit.

If the customer did not return the worn generator, California treated the transaction as a straight sale. The retailer's retained deposit then became part of the full retail selling price, and tax applied to that full amount.

Common questions

Was a refunded exchange deposit taxable?

No, under the source's documented-exchange facts.

How did the retailer have to record it?

Separately as a deposit.

What if the worn generator was never returned?

The deposit became part of the taxable sales price.

Citations and references

The supporting opinion does not cite a specific statute or regulation.

Source

Original ruling text

315.0380

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

January 19, 1950

Mr. A--- K. D--XXXX I--- Street
---, California

Dear Sir:
This is in answer to your letter of January 17 with respect to the application of State slaes tax to an amount charged by a retailer as a deposit upon the exchange of a reconditioned automotive generator for a worn generator which is not immediately delivered to the retailer by the customer. We regret that through inadvertence your earlier inquiry with respect to this matter was unanswered.

It is our opinion that if the original transaction is clearly understood and designated to be an exchange, the tax will not apply to the amount of the deposit in the event that the customer does deliver the worn generator to the retailer and receives a refund of the deposit. The amount of the deposit should, of course, be entered separately in the retailer’s books as a deposit. In the event that the customer does not deliver the worn generator to the retailer pursuant to the exchange agreement, the transaction will be regarded as a straight sale of the reconditioned generator. In this event the retention of the deposit by the retailer will be regarded as an appropriation of the amount thereof to the payment of the retail sales price of the generator, which will be regarded as the full amount charged by the retailer, including the amount originally received as a deposit. The tax will apply, in this case, to the full retail sales price. Very truly yours,

R. G. Hamlin
Associate Tax Counsel

RGH:HB

cc:

H. B. Hoffman

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1950. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace