Was tax on a refunded core deposit also refunded when the customer later returned a used auto part?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1980. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
California gave different refund treatment depending on the replacement part sold.
When the customer bought a new part, paid tax on the price plus a core deposit, and later returned a used part, the customer received only the core deposit back. The tax paid on that deposit was not refunded or credited.
When the customer bought a reconditioned part under the same basic sequence, returning the used core entitled the customer to both the core deposit and the tax paid on that deposit.
Common questions
Did returning a core always produce a tax refund?
No.
What happened for a new replacement part?
Only the deposit was refunded.
What happened for a reconditioned replacement part?
The deposit and the related tax were refunded.
Citations and references
The supporting opinion does not cite a specific statute or regulation for this distinction.
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/315-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/315-0370.pdf
Original ruling text
315.0370
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 322-2378
February 27, 1980
Ms. J--- B. S--G---, S--- & E--XXX --- Road, #XXX
---, CA XXXXX
Re:
G--- A--- Inc.
SY – XX-XXXXXX
Sales Tax on Automobile Parts
Dear Ms. S---:
As you requested on the telephone today, following is a brief outline of our position with respect to the taxation of core deposits on auto parts sold by G--- A---. 1)
New Parts – The customer purchases the part, leaves a core deposit, and is charged tax on the total. Later, he brings in his used part. Under these circumstances, he would be entitled to a credit or refund of the core deposit only. Tax paid with respect to the core deposit should not be credited or refunded to him;
2)
Reconditioned Parts – The customer purchases the part, leaves a deposit, and is charged tax on the total. Later, he brings in his used part. Under these circumstances, he would be entitled to a credit or refund of the core deposit plus tax paid with respect to it. Very truly yours,
Les Sorensen
Tax Counsel
LS:po
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1980. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace