Was a repair company's one-time truck charge included in taxable receipts from parts sales?

Short answer No under the stated assumptions. It paid to bring a service person to the call, applied even without parts, and was separate from fairly priced repair parts.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 295.1806
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1998-02-04
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
The redacted president of a commercial refrigeration and air-conditioning service and repair company

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1998. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1998
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This February 4, 1998 Board tax-counsel letter answers an unpublished December 24, 1997 company letter supplying additional information and an unpublished sample invoice. The requester supplied the facts, and counsel lists assumptions that control the result. The exclusion depends on charging every service call regardless of parts, transporting a service person rather than stocking parts, some labor-only calls, and fair retail pricing of parts; underpricing parts changes the answer. This advisory response does not bind another taxpayer. Check current repairer, service-call, transportation, parts-pricing, resale-certificate, documentation, and sales-and-use-tax law. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The redacted company serviced commercial refrigeration and air-conditioning equipment at customer businesses. Its absent December 24, 1997 letter supplied additional information and an invoice. The one-time “truck charge” defrayed gas, insurance and truck upkeep. Parts were usually ordered by phone and delivered, or sometimes bought locally.

Counsel assumed the charge applied to every service call whether or not parts were sold, did not fund stocking the truck, some calls required only employee labor, and all parts and materials were sold at fair retail prices. Under those assumptions, it paid to bring a service person to perform work and was not included in taxable gross receipts from repair-part sales. Its “truck” label did not make it a section 6012(c)(7) transportation charge.

The letter separately explained Regulation 1546. Separate property charges or parts worth more than ten percent of the total made the repairer a retailer; parts worth ten percent or less with no separate charge made it a consumer. Resale-purchased small fittings, wiring or other consumed items required use-tax reporting on line 2 of the Sales and Use Tax Return. If the company underpriced sold parts, the truck charge would enter their gross receipts. The PDF supplies no invoice, pricing proof, return, audit, appeal, or later outcome.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6051 and section 6012(a) — cited or described for sales tax on retailers and taxable gross receipts without expense deductions; complete text, versions, exemptions, and later history not supplied
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6012(c)(7) — described as excluding certain separately stated transportation charges and in part requiring transportation after sale when performed by retailer trucks or property is sold for a delivered price; complete text, version, other conditions, and later history not supplied
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1546(b)(1) — quoted in part for retailer treatment when repair parts exceed ten percent of total charge or are separately charged, fair-retail-price segregation, and Board determination absent segregation; footnotes, complete regulation, version, and later history not supplied
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1546(b)(2) — quoted for consumer treatment when parts' retail value is ten percent or less of total charge and no separate property charge is made; complete regulation, footnotes, version, and later history not supplied
  • December 24, 1997 redacted company-president letter supplying additional facts and an invoice showing truck charges, including gas, insurance and truck-upkeep costs, phone-ordered or locally obtained parts, and one-time service-call charges — letter, earlier inquiry, invoice, charge schedule and calculation, service tickets, truck records, parts orders and invoices, customer invoices, resale certificates, returns, and tax records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Counsel's express assumptions that the charge applied on every service call regardless of parts sales, did not fund stocking the truck, some calls required only employee labor, and every part and material was sold at fair retail price — contracts, pricing evidence, parts inventory, call records, and accounting allocation not reproduced in the official PDF
  • February 4, 1998 Tax Counsel Janice L. Thurston response excluding the charge under those assumptions, explaining the repairer-retailer and consumer rules, requiring line 2 use-tax reporting when resale-purchased small items were consumed, and warning that underpriced parts would make the charge taxable — no requester reply, changed pricing, return, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, or later outcome supplied; copy sent to a redacted District Administrator
  • Official Annotation 295.1806's all-service-calls, service-person transportation, no truck-stocking, fair-parts-price, taxable-gross-receipts, February 4, 1998, and M99-2 rules — annotation omits the additional-information and invoice provenance, gas and other cost facts, assumptions and underpricing warning, retailer-consumer ten-percent rules, section 6012(c)(7), Regulation 1546 details, line 2 use-tax instruction, absent records, copied administrator, later outcome, and reliance status and supplies no additional proceeding record

Source

Original ruling text

295.1806
STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

JOHAN KLEHS
First District, Hayward

LEGAL DIVISION (MIC:82)
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0082)
Telephone: (916) 324-2588
FAX: (916) 323-3387

DEAN F. ANDAL
Second District, Stockton
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
KATHLEEN CONNELL
Controller, Sacramento
_______

February 4, 1998

JOHN CHIANG
Acting Member
Fourth District, Los Angeles
_______
E. L. SORENSEN, JR.
Executive Director

Mr. R--- D. C--President
C--- R--- S--XXXXX East XXXth Street
---, California XXXXX
Re:

SR -- XX-XXXXXX

Dear Mr. C---:
Thank you for your letter of December 24, 1997 supplying us with additional information as well as a copy of an invoice showing “truck charges.” You have told us that C--- R--- S--(“CRS”) is a commercial refrigeration and air conditioning service and repair company. Customers call CRS when they are having problems with their equipment, and CRS repairmen go to their place of business and provide the necessary service and repairs. You also told us that the “truck charges” defray the costs of gas, insurance and upkeep on company trucks and are a one time charge to get to the job. If repair parts are required, most of the time you order them by phone and they are delivered to you, but at other times, you obtain supplies from local supply stores. We assume that the truck charges are charged on all service calls, whether or not any parts and materials are sold, and are not charged to insure that the truck is stocked with parts that might be needed for repairs. Furthermore, we assume that the problems that your customers have with their equipment do not always necessitate the sale of parts, and in fact some of your service calls may require only the labor of your employee. Finally, we assume that all parts and materials are sold for a fair retail selling price. Our conclusions in this letter are based upon those assumptions and may be different if any of the assumptions are incorrect. Discussion A retailer owes sales tax, measured by gross receipts, on its retail sales of tangible personal property in California unless the sale is specifically exempt by statute. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051.) The taxable gross receipts include the total amount of the retailer’s sale price of the property, without deduction on account of the costs of the property sold, costs and materials used, labor, or service costs, interest paid, losses or any other expense unless specifically excluded from taxation by statute. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6012(a).) That is, charges for service

Mr. R--- D. C---

-2-

February 4, 1998
295.1806

which are part of the retail sale of tangible personal property are included in gross receipts. Although Revenue and Taxation Code section 6012(c)(7) provides a specific exclusion from gross receipts for certain separately stated transportation charges (which in part requires that transportation occur after the sale of property to the purchaser if transportation is by the retailer’s trucks or is sold for delivered price), the charge about which you inquire is not for transportation, although itemized as “truck charges.” Thus, if the charge is regarded as part of the taxable retail sale of tangible personal property, the charge is subject to tax. The Board has adopted Regulation 1546 to explain the application of the tax to repairers such as CRS. The regulation provides in relevant part at subdivision (b): “(1) WHEN RETAILERS. If the retail value of the parts and materials furnished in connection with repair work is more than 10 percent of the total charge, or if the repairman makes a separate charge for such property, the repairman is the retailer and tax applies to the fair retail selling price of the property. [Footnote omitted.] “If the retail value of the property is more than 10 percent of the total charge, the repairman must segregate on the invoices to his customers and in his records the fair retail selling price of the parts and materials from the charges for labor of repair, installation, or other services performed. [Footnote omitted.] ‘Total charge’ means the aggregate of the retail value of the parts and materials furnished or consumed in making the repairs, charges for installation, and charges for labor of repair or other services performed in making the repairs, including charges for in-plant or on-location handling, disassembly and reassembly. It does not include pick-up or delivery charges. “If the retailer does not make a segregation, the retail selling price of the parts and materials will be determined by the board based on information available to it. “(2) WHEN CONSUMERS. If the retail value of the parts and materials furnished in connection with the repair work is 10 percent or less of the total charge, as defined in (b)(1) above, and if no separate charge is made for such property, the repairman is the consumer of the property, and tax applies to the sale of the property to him.” When the repair involves service only, and CRS furnishes no parts or materials, then none of its charge is subject to sales tax. Sales or use tax applies to the sale to, or use by, CRS of any property it consumes when performing such repairs. When CRS does not furnish any parts for which it makes a separately itemized charge, then it is the consumer of any property it does furnish in connection with the repairs if the retail value of that property is ten percent (10%) or

Mr. R--- D. C---

-3-

February 4, 1998
295.1806

less of the total charge. If such is the case, none of CRS’s charge to the customer would be taxable, and sales or use tax would apply to the sale to, or use by, CRS of any property it consumes (including the property furnished to the customer). When CRS is a consumer of property that it had purchased extax under a resale certificate (e.g., the small fittings, wiring, and other items that CRS may furnish without a separate itemization), CRS must report use tax measured by the purchase price of such property on line 2 of its Sales and Use Tax Return. When CRS separately itemizes charges for property furnished to the customer, or when it bills in lump sum and the retail value of the property furnished exceeds ten percent (10%) of the total charge, CRS is the retailer of that property. Sales tax applies to CRS’s gross receipts from the sale of such property, and the remaining question is whether part or all of the “truck charges” are part of those taxable gross receipts. Based upon your representations and our assumptions, we conclude that CRS’s “truck charges” are not includible in the taxable gross receipts from your sale of repair parts as the truck charge is a charge for transporting a service person to a service call so that services may be performed, even though parts and materials may be sold as part of a repair required by that service call. Of course, if our assumptions are in error, our opinion would be different. For example, if you charge less than a fair retail selling price for parts and materials you sell, the truck charge would be includible in the gross receipts from those sales. If you have any questions, please write again. Very truly yours,

Janice L. Thurston
Tax Counsel
JLT/cmm
cc:

--- District Administrator (--)

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1998. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace