Would a proposed cooperative-style store's separately stated 6% administrative fee be part of taxable gross receipts?

Short answer Yes under the proposal. Members would have had to pay the fee to receive the merchandise, making it part of the selling price despite separate statement.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 295.1480
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1954-11-23
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
An unidentified request about a proposed cooperative-style store's separately stated administrative fee

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1954. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1954
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This Nov. 23, 1954 Board assistant-counsel response addresses a proposed cooperative-style store and a hypothetical invoice, not supplied completed sales. The source does not identify the requester as the store. The PDF omits the request, requester identity, attachments, redacted member organization, membership terms, concession agreements, expense budgets, actual invoices and transactions, returns, payments, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, or later outcome. Its example uses a historical 3% tax rate and proposed 5% rent and 6% administrative-and-promotional expense. This prospective advisory conclusion does not bind another taxpayer. Check current cooperative, marketplace, membership, concession, service-fee, documentation, rate, and sales-and-use-tax law.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A proposed cooperative-style store would house concessionaires who would sell merchandise to members below average retail prices. In addition to proposed rent, the concessionaires would pay administrative and promotional expenses, and a hypothetical member invoice added a separately stated 6% administrative fee.

The Board concluded that the fee was taxable. Section 6012 measured tax by the total amount a customer had to pay to receive the merchandise, without deducting labor, service, or other seller expenses.

Separately stating the administrative fee did not remove it from the selling price.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6012, described as including the total selling price without deduction for labor, service, or any other expense in the tax measure (as cited) — the live annotation supplies no statutory citation
  • Proposed cooperative-type store housing concessionaires, sales to members of a redacted organization below average retail prices, 5% rent based on concessionaire net sales, and a 6% administrative and promotional expense — proposal, organization identity, membership terms, concession agreements, rent records, and expense budgets not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Hypothetical invoice showing a $100 selling price, $3 of sales tax at a historical 3% rate, and a $6 administrative fee at 6% — actual invoices, transactions, tax returns, and payment records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • November 23, 1954 assistant-counsel response signed by Bill Holden and copied to Oakland Auditing — request, requester identity, attachments, audit inquiry, reviewer record, and copy-recipient record beyond the printed line not supplied
  • Official Annotation 295.1480's proposed cooperative-store structure, 6% fee, separately stated treatment, taxable conclusion, and November 23, 1954 date — annotation omits the redacted member organization, 5% rent, promotional-expense description, hypothetical $100/$3/$6 invoice, historical 3% rate, section 6012, Oakland copy, missing records, prospective posture, later outcome, and reliance status and supplies no additional proceeding record
  • The prospective advisory conclusion — no completed store, concessionaire sale, customer invoice, tax return, audit, assessment, refund claim, agency adoption, appeal, or later outcome supplied

Source

Original ruling text

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

295.1480

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

November 23, 1954

A cooperative type store will house a number of concessionaires who will sell to members of the --at prices below average retail. The concessionaires pay rental of 5 percent of their net sales. In addition, the concessionaries will pay 6 percent as administrative and promotional expense. A sales invoice might show a selling price of $100 plus a 3 percent sales tax of $3 plus a 6 percent administrative fee of $6. You ask if the tax applies to this charge for administrative fee. Section 6012 of the Sales and Use Tax Law includes in the measure of the tax the total selling price without deduction on account of labor or service costs or any other expense. The total selling price is the total amount which the customer must pay in order to receive the merchandise. It is our opinion, therefore, that the administrative fee, even though separately stated, is a part of the selling price and is subject to sales tax. Very truly yours,

Bill Holden
Assistant Counsel

BH:ja
cc:

Oakland - Auditing

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1954. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace