Did a vehicle dealer include smog-certificate charges and state inspection fees in California taxable gross receipts?

Short answer The dealer's optional charge for transmitting a smog certificate was taxable, but the source excluded the state inspection fee when passed through to the buyer.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 295.1410
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1980-05-29
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
An internal Board request to revise the published annotation on smog-certification charges

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1980. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1980
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This May 29, 1980 Board memorandum from Philip R. Dougherty to Donald J. Hennessy recommends revising and expanding the then-present annotation; it is not a supplied dealer determination. The supporting memorandum prints section 6012(c)(8), fees 'currently $11 or $7,' and 'certificate or compliance'; CDTFA's current annotation instead cites section 6012(c)(9), says the fee was usually $7, and says 'certificate of compliance,' without supplying a reconciliation record. The current annotation supports agency publication of the two charge treatments but does not make this historical internal advice binding on another taxpayer. Check current vehicle-registration, emissions-inspection, fee, fund, documentation, and sales-and-use-tax law. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

When a vehicle dealer charged a customer separately for the dealer's work of transmitting a required smog certificate, the charge remained part of taxable gross receipts. The memorandum treated it as reimbursement for the dealer's cost of doing business, not as an excludable government fee.

The result differed for the inspection fee that the Department of Consumer Affairs was statutorily required to charge and deposit in the State's Vehicle Inspection Fund. When a retailer paid that state fee and passed it to the purchaser, the memorandum said the amount could be excluded under Revenue and Taxation Code section 6012(c)(8).

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6012(c)(8), quoted as excluding a qualifying motor-vehicle fee or tax imposed by and paid to California (as cited in the supporting memorandum) — the live annotation cites section 6012(c)(9) without supplying an amendment or other reconciliation record
  • Unidentified statute requiring the Department of Consumer Affairs to make or authorize specified motor-vehicle pollution-emission inspections, charge an inspection fee, and deposit the fees in the State's Vehicle Inspection Fund — statute, inspection rules, fee schedule, and fund record not identified or supplied in the supporting memorandum
  • Applications to the Department of Motor Vehicles for initial registration or transfer of registration, dealer-transmitted pollution-control device certificates, South Coast Air Basin inspections, and dealer charges — applications, certificates, inspection reports, invoices, fee receipts, and tax records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • May 29, 1980 Philip R. Dougherty memorandum to Donald J. Hennessy revising and expanding the then-present Annotation 295.1410 — prior annotation, request, review record, and publication instruction not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Official Annotation 295.1410's certificate-of-compliance wording, usually-$7 inspection fee, section 6012(c)(9) attribution, two charge treatments, and May 29, 1980 date — supporting memorandum instead prints 'certificate or compliance,' currently-$11-or-$7 fees, and section 6012(c)(8); no amendment, correction, fee-change record, or other reconciliation source is supplied
  • The memorandum's revised-annotation recommendation — no dealer transaction, tax return, audit, assessment, refund claim, formal adoption record beyond the live annotation, appeal, or later outcome supplied

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum
To:

Mr. Donald J. Hennessy

From:

Philip R. Dougherty

Subject:

Revised Annotation to Replace Present 295.1410

295.1410
Date:

May 29, 1980

Gross Receipts
(f)
Costs and Expenses
Smog Control Certification
With each application to the DMV for initial registration or transfer of registration of certain motor vehicles, a dealer must also transmit a valid polution control [smog] device certificate or compliance. There is no requirement that the dealer charge the purchaser for transmitting the certificate, but a dealer may choose to make a separate charge for the transmittal and so be specifically reimbursed for that cost of doing business. Such a charge to the purchaser may not be excluded from the amount upon which the sales tax is computed. The Department of Consumer Affairs is required to make or authorize certain motor vehicle pollution emission inspections of motor vehicles in the South Coast Air Basin. The Department is required by statute to charge a fee for the inspection. These fees must be deposited in the State’s Vehicle Inspection Fund. Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6012(c)(8) excludes from the amount subject to sales tax any motor vehicle fee or tax imposed by and paid to the State of California that has been added to or is measured by a stated percentage of the sales or purchase price of a motor vehicle. Accordingly, when the fee (currently $11 or $7) [charged by the Department of Consumer Affairs] is paid by a retailer of a motor vehicle and charged to the purchaser, that amount may be excluded from the computation of sales tax due.

This revises and expands on annotation 295.1410. PRD

PRD:ba

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1980. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace