Could a tree nursery deduct special UPS packing and legally required inspection charges from taxable gross receipts?

Short answer No. Packing was taxable handling labor, and required inspection costs were nondeductible expenses because no statute excluded them.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 295.1387
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1991-11-15
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A tree nursery asking about special packing and government inspection charges

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1991
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This Nov. 15, 1991 Board tax-counsel response addresses a nursery's May 28 and Aug. 12 letters and unspecified file information about return deductions. The supporting letter names agricultural-quarantine and phytosanitary certificates but does not identify the requiring agency or law; CDTFA's current annotation attributes inspection to the U.S. Government without supplying another record. This fact-specific advisory response is not a supplied final return or proceeding disposition, and another taxpayer cannot rely on it as binding. Check current transportation, handling, agricultural inspection, certificate, interstate and international shipment, documentation, and sales-and-use-tax law. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A California nursery sold seedlings, live Christmas trees, and container trees. It separately charged special packing labor for UPS shipments and passed through legally required agricultural quarantine or phytosanitary inspection costs for certain interstate or international shipments.

Both charges were taxable. Special packing before transportation was handling, not excludable transportation, and its labor and materials were nondeductible costs. Government inspection costs were likewise business expenses included in gross receipts because the Board identified no statute allowing their exclusion.

Citations

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6012(a)(2), 6012(a)(3), 6012(c)(7), and 6051 (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1628(a) (as cited)
  • Agricultural Quarantine Compliance Inspection Certificate and Phytosanitary Inspection Certificate described as legally required for specified interstate or international shipments — law, agency, certificate form, fee schedule, and supporting authority not identified or supplied in the supporting letter
  • May 28 and August 12, 1991 nursery letters and other information in the Board file — letters, file materials, and attachments, other than quoted passages, not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Tree seedling, live Christmas tree and container-tree sales, UPS-directed shipments, special protective packing labor and materials, government inspections, customer charges, and return deductions — orders, invoices, packing records, carrier records, inspection certificates, fee receipts, returns, deduction schedules, and accounting records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • November 15, 1991 tax-counsel response blind-copied to a redacted district administrator and Eric Elberg of Return Review — no nursery reply, return adjustment, audit, assessment, refund claim, agency adoption, appeal, or later outcome supplied
  • Official Annotation 295.1387's tree categories, UPS packing, U.S.-Government inspection attribution, taxable-sale qualification, handling and no-statutory-exclusion conclusions, and November 15, 1991 date — supporting letter names agricultural-quarantine and phytosanitary certificates but does not identify the government entity; annotation omits the two requests, Board file, return deductions, statutory and regulatory citations, blind-copy recipients, missing records, later outcome, and reliance status and supplies no additional proceeding record

Source

Original ruling text

295.1387

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 324-8208

November 15, 1991

Mr. I--- L--L--- T--- F--- of C--X --- Road
--- ---, California XXXXX
Re:

Application of Sales Tax to Packing Charges and
Government Inspection Costs
SR --- XX-XXXXXX

Dear Mr. L---:
I have been requested to respond to your letters dated May 28, 1991 and August 12, 1991, concerning the application of sales tax to packing charges and government inspection costs. From your letter and other information in our file, it appears that the following are the pertinent facts. Your business, L--- T--- F--- of C---, a California partnership, sells tree seedlings, live Christmas trees, and container trees. On your sales and use tax returns, you have been deducting the costs of certain items which you describe as follows: “UPS PACKING: UPS packing charge is used for those specific shipments which the client directs us to ship via United Parcel Service. Since our products are tree seedlings that need to be protected from the bruising and other mechanical damage that occur during common carrier handling, we pack these shipments specially, and this additional labor cost is charged specifically to the orders which require this service. “GOVERNMENT INSPECTIONS: This is an Agricultural Quarantine Compliance Inspection Certificate, or Phytosanitory Inspection Certificate, which is required by law for specific interstate or international shipments, and therefore needs to be charged to the specific shipment for which it pertains.”

Mr. I--- L---

-2-

November 15, 1991
295.1387

Revenue and Taxation Code section 6051 imposes a sales tax on all retailers measured by their gross receipts from retail sales of tangible personal property. “Gross receipts” mean the total amount of the sale price of the retail sales of retailers, valued in money, without any deduction on account of materials used, labor or service costs, or any other expense. Rev. & Tax. Code § 6012(a)(2). Gross receipts also includes transportation charges unless the requirements of Revenue and Taxation Code section 6012(c)(7) are met. Rev. & Tax. Code § 6012(a)(3). Under the Sales and Use Tax Regulations, excludable transportation charges do not include handling charges, i.e., the costs for labor and materials used to package an item before it is transported. Regulation 1628(a). Since your UPS packing charges are handling charges which are nondeductible labor costs, these charges must be included in the measure of tax. There is no statute which excludes government inspection costs from the measure of tax or permits a deduction for such costs. Therefore, under Revenue and Taxation Code section 6012(a)(2) such costs are a nondeductible expense. If you have further questions regarding sales and use tax law, please do not hesitate to write again. Sincerely,

Elizabeth Abreu
Tax Counsel

EA:cl
bc:

--- District Administrator
Mr. Eric Elberg, Return Review Section

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1991. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace