Were separately stated flow-meter calibration and startup charges taxable when performed at the seller's factory?

Short answer Yes. Factory calibration and startup were assembly or fabrication, not jobsite installation, so their charges entered the taxable sales price.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 295.1330
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1993-10-12
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
An out-of-state flow-meter seller asking about calibration, startup, and California shipments

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1993
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This Oct. 12, 1993 Board tax-counsel response addresses a seller's June 17, Aug. 15 and Oct. 1 letters and a referenced July 2 Board letter. It assumes the seller did not install meters under construction contracts and says representative facts were insufficient. Future Israel-transfer quantity, timing and valve identity were expressly unknown. CDTFA's current annotation omits that export issue. This fact-specific advisory response is not a supplied final transaction or proceeding disposition, and another taxpayer cannot rely on it as binding. Check current fabrication, installation, construction-contract, retailer, drop-shipment, export, certificate, refund, documentation, and sales-and-use-tax law. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An out-of-state seller performed flow-lab calibration and startup procedures on flow meters at its manufacturing facility. The Board treated those procedures as assembly or fabrication rather than installation because they occurred at the factory, not at the customer's jobsite. The charges were therefore included in the taxable sales price even if separately stated.

Because title generally passed outside California and the seller was registered with the Board, the letter said use tax applied to meters shipped to California and the seller had to collect it from direct customers. Whether a representative or the manufacturer was the retailer on representative-generated orders depended on who solicited and accepted orders, handled returns and adjustments, invoiced, and received payment.

For valves delivered into California for possible later incorporation into systems sent to Israel, an exemption certificate could be used only if the California customer knew in advance which valves would leave the state for exclusive out-of-state use. Without advance identification, the customer had to pay use tax and later seek a refund when qualifying valves were removed from California.

Key assumptions and conclusions

  • Factory calibration and startup were taxable fabrication, not nontaxable installation.
  • The letter assumed the seller did not also install the meters under construction contracts.
  • A registered out-of-state retailer shipping property for California use had collection duties under the stated facts.
  • The out-of-state-use exclusion required advance identification; later removal instead supported a refund claim.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6007, 6009.1, 6011, 6051, 6201, and 6203 (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1620(a)(2)(A) and (B) — as cited; source says a copy was enclosed, but the enclosure is absent from the official PDF
  • June 17, August 15, and October 1, 1993 seller letters, plus a July 2, 1993 Board letter referenced in the August response — letters and attachments, except quoted passages, one described invoice, and unspecified documentation, not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Flow-meter invoices, factory calibration and startup, construction-contract status, direct and representative orders, order forms, acceptance rights, returns and adjustments, customer invoices and payments, shipping methods, FOB terms, seller registration, and California branch participation — contracts, invoices, orders, correspondence, shipping records, permits, and registration records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Missouri-customer order shipped to Auburn, California, later valve orders possibly incorporated into systems transferred to Israel, representative documentation, and Board registration search for the intermediary — invoice and documentation described but not reproduced; future quantity, timing, and valve identification expressly unknown
  • Exemption certificate under section 6009.1 and later refund claim when valves could not be identified before California use — no certificate, removal proof, export record, refund claim, or disposition supplied
  • October 12, 1993 tax-counsel response based on an express no-installation assumption and incomplete representative facts — no seller reply, corrected facts, tax collection, certificate, refund, audit, assessment, agency adoption, appeal, or later outcome supplied
  • Official Annotation 295.1330's factory calibration and startup, separately stated fabrication, California use-tax collection, representative-sale and section 6007 conclusions, and October 12, 1993 date — annotation omits the three requests and July 2 letter, construction-contract assumption, detailed retailer tests, section 6009.1 Israel scenario, exemption-certificate and refund distinction, Regulation 1620 and missing enclosure, incomplete facts and records, later outcome, and reliance status and supplies no additional proceeding record

Source

Original ruling text

295.1330

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 324-8208

MEMBER
First District
BRAD SHERMAN
Second District, Los Angeles
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
MATTHEW K. FONG
Fourth District, Los Angeles

October 12, 1993

GRAY DAVIS
Controller, Sacramento

BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director

Ms. H--- L--B--- M---, Inc.
XXXX East --th Street
---, -- XXXXX-XXXX
Re:

B--- M---, Inc.
SC -- XX-XXXXXX

Dear Ms. L---:
This is in response to your letters to the Board dated June 17, 1993, August 15, 1993, and October 1, 1993. In your August 15 letter you state in part: "Relative to your letter of July 2, 1993 we are providing an invoice on which we taxed the taxes on calibration and start up. The customer said that we erred and we did deduct the taxes on these procedures. "We are now seeking an opinion as to whether we processed the invoice incorrectly. The Flow Lab Calibration and Start Up procedures are performed on flow meters which we sell and we do need to know your opinion relative to taxes thereon." Revenue and Taxation Code section 6051 imposes a sales tax on all retailers measured by their gross receipts from retail sales in this state of tangible personal property. Revenue and Taxation Code section 6201 imposes a use tax on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from any retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state. The use tax, which complements the sales tax, is imposed upon outof-state purchases of property for use in California. Since it appears from your letters that you are only furnishing the meters, not furnishing and installing the meters, we assume that your contracts are not construction contracts. If this assumption is incorrect, our conclusions in this letter may not apply to the transactions you

Ms. H--- L---

describe.

-2-

October 12, 1993
295.1330

Ms. H--- L---

-3-

October 12, 1993
295.1330

As will be discussed in further detail below, the appropriate tax on your transactions is use tax. Use tax is measured by the sales price which means the total amount for which tangible personal property is sold. The sales price includes labor and service costs and services that are a part of the sale but does not include installation charges. Rev. & Tax. Code § 6011. It appears from your letters that flow calibration and start up are procedures that are performed at your manufacturing facility rather than at the jobsite during installation. Therefore, we regard such procedures as assembly or fabrication labor. The charges for such procedures are subject to tax. In your August 15, 1993 letter you further state: "We receive orders from the direct customer or from representatives ordering devices and ask that they be shipped to their customer in California. We ship the orders as requested by the customer, i.e., air, UPS, parcel post, etc. Most of our purchase orders received indicate f.o.b. Tulsa, OK, i.e., title to devices/products passes here in Tulsa. Only a very few orders show f.o.b. xxxxxx, CA." Where title to tangible personal property passes outside of California, the applicable tax is use tax. The use tax is imposed upon the purchaser, but if the retailer is engaged in business in California and makes sales of tangible personal property for storage, use, or other consumption in this state, he or she must, at the time of making the sale, collect the use tax from the purchaser and pay it to the state. Rev. & Tax. Code § 6203. The purchaser must pay the use tax to the retailer if the retailer holds a seller's permit or is registered with the Board. You indicate that title usually passes in Tulsa. Therefore, use tax applies to these transactions. Since you are registered with the Board, you must collect use tax from your customers who order directly from you if you ship or deliver the property to California. Even if title passes in California, use tax rather than sales applies unless there is participation in the sale by a local office or branch as described in Regulation 1620(a)(2)(A) and (B), copy enclosed. We do not have enough facts to determine if you are the retailer liable for tax in those transactions in which a customer orders a device from a representative. If the representative solicits orders in your name or on your order forms, if you reserve the right to accept or decline orders and to accept returns or make other adjustments with customers, and if you issue invoices to the customer in your name and the customer pays you directly, you are the retailer. Otherwise, the representative may be the retailer, depending upon the facts. In your October 1, 1993 letter you state: "We are requesting advice relative to a customer of ours in Missouri who requested that we make a shipment to their customer in California. The MO customer does not have a resale certificate and I taxed this one order.

Ms. H--- L---

-4-

October 12, 1993
295.1330

"Now it appears that there will be future orders to the same customer in California with a possible transfer to Israel, after the valves are incorporated into a system. They do not have a time element or a definite number of valves to be incorporated. They feel that they should not be charged tax on any of these orders and I do need an opinion from you. "I am enclosing some documentation which the representative involved in the order has sent to us, as provided by your facility." You attached an invoice which shows that the property was shipped to I--- C--- in Auburn, California and that the property was sold to C--- S--- D--- of Ballwin, Missouri. We regard you as the retailer in this transaction. Even if C--- S--- is not your agent or representative soliciting orders on your behalf, under a special provision of the Revenue and Taxation Code (section 6007), you are the retailer if C--- S--- is not engaged in business in California. Our records show that C--- S--- is not registered with the Board. Therefore, you should collect and pay tax on these transactions. Revenue and Taxation Code section 6009.1 provides that "storage" and "use" do not include the keeping, retaining, or exercising any right or power over tangible personal property for the purpose of subsequently transporting it outside the state for use thereafter solely outside the state, or for the purpose of being processed, fabricated, or manufactured into, attached to or incorporated into, other tangible personal property to be transported outside the state and thereafter used solely outside the state. Rev. & Tax. Code § 6009.1. If the California customer knew in advance which valves were being incorporated into property to be transported to Israel, the customer could issue you an exemption certificate for section 6009.1. According to your letter, however, the customer does not know in advance which valves will be removed from California. Therefore, the customer must pay use tax to you and then file a claim for refund when the valves are removed from California. If you have further questions regarding Sales and Use Tax Law, please do not hesitate to write again. Sincerely,

Elizabeth Abreu
Tax Counsel
EA:cl

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1993. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace