Could a school-uniform retailer deduct a percentage of student sales paid to the school as a rebate?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1958. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A retailer sold uniforms to private-school students and paid the school a percentage of the sales price. The retailer argued that the school payment reduced the price of the merchandise.
Tax counsel rejected that treatment. The students paid the full purchase price, while the school payment was a commission or other seller expense.
A cash discount could reduce receipts only when allowed to the purchaser. Because the school—not the student buyer—received the amount, tax applied to the entire sales price.
Citations and references
- California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6012 (as cited)
- April 7, 1958 attorney letter stating the uniform store's position that its school payment reduced merchandise sales price — letter not separately reproduced beyond the response's summary
- Unidentified retailer, private school, uniform sales, percentage payment, students and claimed rebate — retailer-school agreement, percentage, student terms, merchandise prices, invoices, payments, accounting, returns, and tax records not reproduced in the official PDF
- Official Annotation 295.0980's retailer, school-student purchases, percentage rebate to school, purchaser-benefit requirement, no gross-receipts exclusion, and April 15, 1958 date — annotation omits the attorney and request provenance, uniform-store setting, unidentified percentage and agreement, section 6012 quotations and broader expense examples, missing records, reliance status, and later outcome and supplies no additional transaction record
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/295-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/295-0980.pdf
Original ruling text
295.0980
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
April 15, 1958
Mr. M--- B--Attorney at Law
--- --- --XXXXX W--- Boulevard
--- ---, California ----Dear M---:
It appears that the client mentioned in your letter of April 7 sells uniforms in a retail store to students of a private school. The store pays over to the school a percentage of the sales price received for the sale of the uniforms. You state it is the store’s position that the amount thus paid over to the school constitutes a reduction of the sales price of the article. Under the California Sales and Use Tax Law, the tax is clearly imposed upon the total amount of the sales price. No deduction is allowable on account of the amount paid over to the school. I think you will find this quite clear from the definition of “gross receipts” as set forth in Section 6012 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. The section defines “gross receipts” as the total amount of the sales price without any deduction on account of any of the following: “The cost of the materials used, labor or service cost, interest paid, losses, or any other expense”, and provides that the total amount of the sale price includes “any services that are a part of the sale”. The tax applies to the amount paid by the purchaser as the purchase price of the merchandise. It is immaterial what the seller may do with the proceeds. A retailer cannot deduct commissions or any other selling expense or amounts paid to accountants or anyone else rendering assistance in the operation of his business. Thus, the retailer will be accountable for the sales tax on the entire sales price, without deduction on the amount of the so-called rebate to the school. Where a discount is given to the purchaser, the retailer may exclude the amount of the discount thus allowed to the purchaser. In your case, it does not appear that the purchaser receives any discount or price deduction. I too missed our class reunion in San Francisco last year. I have not been to such a reunion for a long time. I suppose it was about time I attended, although I did attend a University of California Law School Association dinner last spring, and met quite a number of old classmates and friends. Kindest regards,
E. H. Stetson
Tax Counsel
EHS:tl
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1958. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace