Could a school-uniform retailer deduct a percentage of student sales paid to the school as a rebate?

Short answer No. The payment went to the school rather than the purchasing student, so it was a selling expense, not a cash discount reducing price.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 295.0980
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1958-04-15
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
An attorney asking whether a uniform retailer's percentage payments to a private school reduced student purchase prices

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1958. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1958
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This April 15, 1958 Board tax-counsel letter answers an attorney's unreproduced April 7 letter about an unidentified client's uniform sales and payments to a private school. It rests on the Board's understanding that students paid the full merchandise price and only the school received the percentage payment; the percentage and agreement are not supplied. The PDF does not reproduce the request, retailer-school agreement, student terms, percentage, uniforms and prices, invoices, school payments, accounting, returns, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, section 6596 treatment, or later outcome. CDTFA's current annotation states the purchaser-benefit rule but supplies no missing record. Another taxpayer cannot treat this sparse, fact-dependent staff response as binding and should check current school-fundraising, customer-credit, commission, marketplace, rebate, cash-discount, documentation, and sales-and-use-tax law. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A retailer sold uniforms to private-school students and paid the school a percentage of the sales price. The retailer argued that the school payment reduced the price of the merchandise.

Tax counsel rejected that treatment. The students paid the full purchase price, while the school payment was a commission or other seller expense.

A cash discount could reduce receipts only when allowed to the purchaser. Because the school—not the student buyer—received the amount, tax applied to the entire sales price.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6012 (as cited)
  • April 7, 1958 attorney letter stating the uniform store's position that its school payment reduced merchandise sales price — letter not separately reproduced beyond the response's summary
  • Unidentified retailer, private school, uniform sales, percentage payment, students and claimed rebate — retailer-school agreement, percentage, student terms, merchandise prices, invoices, payments, accounting, returns, and tax records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Official Annotation 295.0980's retailer, school-student purchases, percentage rebate to school, purchaser-benefit requirement, no gross-receipts exclusion, and April 15, 1958 date — annotation omits the attorney and request provenance, uniform-store setting, unidentified percentage and agreement, section 6012 quotations and broader expense examples, missing records, reliance status, and later outcome and supplies no additional transaction record

Source

Original ruling text

295.0980

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

April 15, 1958
Mr. M--- B--Attorney at Law
--- --- --XXXXX W--- Boulevard
--- ---, California ----Dear M---:
It appears that the client mentioned in your letter of April 7 sells uniforms in a retail store to students of a private school. The store pays over to the school a percentage of the sales price received for the sale of the uniforms. You state it is the store’s position that the amount thus paid over to the school constitutes a reduction of the sales price of the article. Under the California Sales and Use Tax Law, the tax is clearly imposed upon the total amount of the sales price. No deduction is allowable on account of the amount paid over to the school. I think you will find this quite clear from the definition of “gross receipts” as set forth in Section 6012 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. The section defines “gross receipts” as the total amount of the sales price without any deduction on account of any of the following: “The cost of the materials used, labor or service cost, interest paid, losses, or any other expense”, and provides that the total amount of the sale price includes “any services that are a part of the sale”. The tax applies to the amount paid by the purchaser as the purchase price of the merchandise. It is immaterial what the seller may do with the proceeds. A retailer cannot deduct commissions or any other selling expense or amounts paid to accountants or anyone else rendering assistance in the operation of his business. Thus, the retailer will be accountable for the sales tax on the entire sales price, without deduction on the amount of the so-called rebate to the school. Where a discount is given to the purchaser, the retailer may exclude the amount of the discount thus allowed to the purchaser. In your case, it does not appear that the purchaser receives any discount or price deduction. I too missed our class reunion in San Francisco last year. I have not been to such a reunion for a long time. I suppose it was about time I attended, although I did attend a University of California Law School Association dinner last spring, and met quite a number of old classmates and friends. Kindest regards,

E. H. Stetson
Tax Counsel
EHS:tl

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1958. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace