Could a restaurant deduct amounts retained by Diners' Club and similar organizations as cash discounts?

Short answer No. The customer received no discount; the retained amount paid for billing and collection services and was a nondeductible business expense.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 295.0880
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1958-01-31
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A restaurant claiming that amounts retained by Diners' Club and similar billing organizations were cash discounts

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1958. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1958
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This Jan. 31, 1958 Board letter answers an unreproduced Jan. 24 claim that sales tax had been paid erroneously on amounts retained by Diners' Club and similar organizations. It rests on the Board's understanding that customers received no discount and the organizations retained the amount for billing and collection; counsel made the refusal conditional on not misunderstanding the proposed deduction. The PDF does not reproduce the request, organization agreements, member and customer terms, meal bills, statements, collections, retained amounts, returns, tax payments and computation, clarification, refund claim, audit, determination, hearing, Board action, refund, appeal, section 6596 treatment, or later outcome. CDTFA's current annotation states the general result but supplies no missing record. Another taxpayer cannot treat this historical, understanding-dependent staff response as binding and should check current credit-card, delivery-platform, marketplace, factoring, billing, cash-discount, documentation, and sales-and-use-tax law. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A restaurant allowed Diners' Club and similar organizations to retain part of the meal charges they billed and collected from their members. The restaurant characterized those amounts as cash discounts.

The Board rejected that treatment. A cash discount reduced gross receipts only when the consumer received its benefit. Here, the organizations kept the amounts as compensation for handling customer accounts.

Because the payments were seller expenses for billing and collection services, they could not be deducted from taxable gross receipts.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6012 (as cited)
  • January 24, 1958 letter asserting sales tax had been paid erroneously on amounts retained by Diners' Club and similar organizations — letter not separately reproduced beyond the response's summary
  • Restaurant charges, member accounts, organizational billing and collection, retained compensation, claimed discounts, and tax paid — organization agreements, member and customer terms, meal bills, statements, collections, retained amounts, returns, payments, and tax computations not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Conditional refusal to authorize a deduction unless the Board misunderstood the proposed deduction — no clarification, refund claim, audit, determination, hearing, Board action, refund, appeal, or later outcome supplied
  • Official Annotation 295.0880's customer-benefit requirement, restaurant, member organizations, billing and collection compensation, no cash discount, and Jan. 31, 1958 date — annotation omits the request provenance, claimed erroneous tax payment, Diners' Club name, section 6012 quotations and broader expense examples, conditional misunderstanding caveat, missing records, reliance status, and later outcome and supplies no additional transaction record

Source

Original ruling text

295.0880

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

January 31, 1958

Gentlemen:
This is in reply to your letter of January 24 in which you express the opinion that you have paid sales tax erroneously upon amounts which you allow to the Diners’ Club and similar organizations as compensation for their services in billing and collecting from their members charges for meals which you charge to the organizations. You speak of this compensation as a cash discount. Section 6012 of the Sales and Use Tax Law excludes from the definition of gross receipts the following: “Cash discounts allowed and taken on sales”. As we interpret this provision, the consumer is the party who must receive the benefit of the discount in order for the retailer to exclude it from his gross receipts. What you regard as a discount in your letter appears to us to be just what you state it to be, namely, compensation to certain organizations for their services in connection with handling your accounts with customers. The customers do not receive the benefit of the so-called discount as we understand it but this is retained by the organizations and is, therefore, an expense of doing business which is not deductible from gross receipts under section 6012. This section also provides that “gross receipts” means the total amount of the sale price without and deduction on account of “the cost of materials used, labor or service costs, interest paid, losses, or any other expense”. (underscoring added) Retailers cannot deduct commissions or other selling expenses; they cannot deduct wages or amounts paid to accountants or other persons rendering assistance in the operation of their business. Unless we are under a misapprehension as to what you propose to deduct as a cash discount, we must inform you that we cannot authorize any such deduction from your gross receipts for sales tax purposes. Vty EHS: ds

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1958. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace