Did debt remaining on an insolvent business's conditional-sale property count toward taxable consideration when an assignee or receiver sold it?

Short answer Yes. Whether the buyer assumed the unpaid balance or acquired the property subject to it, paying that balance was part of the taxable sale consideration.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 295.0800
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1955-06-22
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A person seeking advice about asset sales by assignees or receivers of insolvent businesses

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1955. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1955
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This June 22, 1955 Board associate-tax-counsel letter answers a redacted, undated request about circumstances said to arise from time to time in business-asset liquidations. It identifies no actual debtor, representative, purchaser, property, contract, amount, sale, or tax proceeding and cites no California statute or regulation by number; its only numbered authority is United States v. Hendler, 303 U.S. 564. The PDF does not reproduce the request, conditional-sale contracts, assignments, receivership orders, liquidation and sale agreements, unpaid-balance and payment records, returns, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, section 6596 treatment, or later outcome. CDTFA's current annotation closely restates the general scenario but supplies no missing evidence. Another taxpayer cannot treat this historical staff opinion as binding and should check current insolvency, receivership, assignment, secured-transaction, debt-assumption, foreclosure, documentation, and sales-and-use-tax law. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An assignee or receiver of an insolvent business sometimes sold property that the business had bought under a conditional-sale contract. The buyer either expressly assumed the unpaid contract balance or acquired the property subject to that balance.

Tax counsel concluded that the unpaid debt was part of the consideration for the asset sale and was subject to sales tax. The same result applied to a subject-to transfer because the purchaser had to pay the existing balance to acquire the property.

Citations and references

  • United States v. Hendler, 303 U.S. 564 (as cited)
  • Redacted request for advice about recurring liquidation sales by assignees or receivers — date, requester identity and role, form, complete contents, and copy not supplied in the official PDF
  • Unidentified insolvent businesses, conditional-sale contracts, property, unpaid balances, liquidation representatives, purchasers, assumptions, and subject-to transfers — general scenarios only; contracts, assignments, receivership orders, sale agreements, payments, tax records, and outcomes not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Official Annotation 295.0800's insolvent debtor, assignee or receiver, conditional-sale property, assumed or subject-to balance, consideration, taxable result, and June 22, 1955 date — annotation omits the request provenance, recurring hypothetical posture, United States v. Hendler citation, missing records, absence of a cited California statute or regulation, reliance status, and later outcome and supplies no additional transaction record

Source

Original ruling text

295.0800

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

June 22, 1955



Dear Ms. --- ---:
You request our advice as to the application of tax under circumstances which often arise in the liquidation of assets of businesses. From time to time the assignor or receiver of the assets of the insolvent business will sell property purchased by the insolvent under a conditional sale contract on which there is a balance due. Sometimes the buyer assumes and agrees to pay the unpaid balance. In other instances, the buyer acquires the property “subject to” the unpaid balance. We think that where property is sold and the purchaser assumes the balance due under conditional sales contract such balance due is part of the consideration for the sale of the property and is subject to sales tax. (See U. S. v. Hendler, 303 U. S. 564.) We also think there is no substantial difference between a sale in which the buyer assumes the balance due under a conditional sales contract and a sale where the buyer acquires the property “subject to” the unpaid balance since, in order to acquire the property, the purchaser must pay that unpaid balance. If you have any further questions with respect to this matter, please feel free to call upon us. Very truly yours,

John H. Murray
Associate Tax Counsel

JHM:ph
cc:

Los Angeles – Auditing

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1955. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace