How were undercoating charges treated for new cars sold by dealers versus used cars already owned by customers?

Short answer New-car undercoating entered the vehicle's taxable price; a person undercoating a customer-owned used car was treated as consumer of the materials.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 295.0740
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1950-05-15
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
An internal tax official asking about undersealing new and customer-owned used automobiles

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1950. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1950
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This May 15, 1950 Board internal memorandum answers T. A. Valentine's unreproduced inquiry about an unidentified new-car dealer. It cites no statute, regulation, case, or prior ruling by number and describes a tax-paid-purchases-resold deduction that CDTFA's current annotation omits. The PDF does not reproduce the inquiry, dealer and customer identities, sales contracts, invoices, separately stated charges, labor and material costs, tax-paid purchase records, vehicle ownership and delivery evidence, returns, audit workpapers, assessment, refund claim, appeal, section 6596 treatment, or later outcome. The used-car discussion is likewise a general 'if' statement without a supplied transaction. Another taxpayer cannot treat this historical internal opinion as binding and should check current vehicle-option, repair-person, material, tax-paid-purchase, documentation, and sales-and-use-tax law. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A new-car dealer undersealed automobiles before delivering them to purchasers. Tax counsel included the entire labor-and-material charge in the taxable new-car price, rather than allowing a deduction for undercoating.

The memorandum said the dealer could deduct the cost of tax-paid material purchased and resold in the new-car transaction under the practice then described.

When a service provider undercoated a used car already belonging to the customer, the provider was treated as consumer of the materials, and tax applied to the provider's material cost rather than as a retail sale of the whole service charge.

Citations and references

  • The official memorandum cites no statute, regulation, case, or prior ruling by number.
  • Inquiry from Board official T. A. Valentine concerning tax on a new-car dealer's undersealing charge — date, form, contents beyond the response's recap, and copy not provided in the official PDF
  • Unidentified dealer's pre-delivery new-car undersealing and tax-paid materials, and unidentified providers' work on customer-owned used cars — dealer and customer transactions, sales contracts, invoices, labor and material costs, tax-paid purchase records, ownership and delivery records, and tax records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Official Annotation 295.0740's pre-sale automobile undercoating, separately stated charge, taxable new-car gross receipts, and used-car undercoater's consumer status with May 15, 1950 date — annotation omits the internal inquiry and requester, tax-paid-purchases-resold deduction described in the source, missing transactions and records, absence of numbered authority, reliance status, and later outcome and supplies no additional transaction record

Source

Original ruling text

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE

295.0740
Place:
Date:

To:

Mr. T. A. Valentine

From:

R. G. Hamlin

Re:

Undersealing Automobiles

Sacramento
May 15, 1950

You have inquired with respect to the application of the tax to a new car dealer’s charge for undersealing new automobiles before delivery to the purchaser. You are advised that it is our opinion that the sales tax applies to the total charge made for new automobiles without any deduction on account of the cost of labor and material in “undercoating” the automobile. The dealer, however, would be entitled to take a deduction for tax-paid purchases resold in the amount of the cost price of material purchased tax-paid and applied to the charge. If the work is done on used cars belonging to the customer, we believe that the tax would properly apply upon the cost price of the materials used, the persons performing the work being regarded as the consumers.

RGH:HB

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1950. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace