Was a separately billed overtime amount taxable when a buyer's delayed delivery required a materials seller to keep employees after hours?

Short answer Yes. The overtime reimbursed the seller's labor expense and was a service forming part of the material sale, so separate billing did not exclude it.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 295.0580
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1966-09-22
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A construction-material seller asking about separately billed employee overtime for delayed delivery

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1966. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1966
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This Sept. 22, 1966 Board Tax Counsel letter answers an attorney's Sept. 21 request about a stated delayed-delivery and overtime-billing scenario for construction materials. The PDF quotes the scenario but does not reproduce the complete request, order, delivery schedule, purchaser request, agreement, invoice, employee time and payroll records, overtime or reimbursement payment, material records, returns, audits, assessments, refund claims, appeals, or later outcomes. CDTFA's current annotation restates the basic scenario and conclusion but supplies no additional sale or billing record. Another taxpayer cannot treat this fact-specific staff opinion as binding and should check current overtime, delayed-delivery, carrier, storage, separately stated charge, documentation, and sales-and-use-tax law. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A buyer could not accept construction materials at the originally scheduled time and requested later delivery. To comply, the seller kept plant employees after normal hours and separately billed the buyer for their overtime.

Tax counsel concluded that tax applied to the material price plus the overtime amount. The charge reimbursed labor or service cost and paid for a service forming part of the sale, so stating it separately did not remove it from gross receipts.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6012 (as cited)
  • Sept. 21, 1966 attorney letter asking about a stated scenario involving delayed construction-material delivery and separately billed employee overtime — substantive scenario quoted; complete letter and supporting records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Purchaser equipment breakdown or other inability to accept delivery, later-delivery request, plant employees kept after hours, overtime payment, purchaser agreement, and separate billing — stated scenario; order, delivery schedule, request, agreement, invoice, time records, payroll, payment, and material records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Official Annotation 295.0580's construction-material seller, purchaser-requested later delivery, employee overtime, original material price, separately billed overtime, total taxable measure, and Sept. 22, 1966 date — annotation omits the Sept. 21 request, example purchaser-equipment breakdown, plant and agreement details, section 6012 quotation, missing records, and later outcome and supplies no additional sale or billing record
  • Possible delayed delivery, overtime work or payment, purchaser reimbursement, return filing, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, or other later agency action — not supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

295.0580

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

September 22, 1966

Mr. F--- S. W--Attorney at Law
M---, H---, S---,
A--- & W--XXX --- -----, CA XXXXX
S- -- XX XXXXXX
A. T--- & S--Dear Mr. W---g:
In your letter of September 21, 1966, you request our advice as to whether in the following situation the sales tax applies only to the amount billed as the sales price of the materials or to the total amount of the sales price of the materials and the separately billed amount for the overtime payment to the T--- employees: “Due to the inability of a purchaser of T--- to use rock, sand, gravel, concrete, mixed concrete or asphalt or other materials at the original time of delivery as, for example, due to a breakdown of the purchaser’s equipment, the purchaser requests a later delivery time. To comply with the purchaser’s request, T--- is required to keep employees at its plant after the usual working hours and to make overtime payments to the employees. By agreement with the purchaser the amount of the overtime payment is billed to the purchaser, the amount being shown separately from the sales price of the materials sold to the purchaser.” The tax applies to the total amount of the sales price of the materials and the separately billed amount for the overtime payments. We believe that this conclusion is compelled by § 6012 of the Sales and Use Tax Law, defining “gross receipts” by which the tax is measured as: “…the total amount of the sale or lease or rental price…without any deduction on account of….” “The cost of the materials used, labor or service cost, interest paid, losses, or any other expense.” (Underscoring added.)

Mr. F--- S. W---

-2-

September 22, 1966
295.0580

And providing that the total amount of the sale or lease or rental price includes “any services that are a part of the sale.” Very truly yours,

E. H. Stetson
Tax Counsel

EHS:fb
cc:

--- District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1966. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace