Was an additional music royalty for worldwide use part of the taxable price of a sound-recorded motion picture?

Short answer Yes under the 1954 opinion. The broader use right made the transferred picture more valuable, so the separately stated royalty was part of the sale.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 295.0540
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1954-05-10
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A sound-recording company asking about an additional music royalty for worldwide use of a customer's motion picture

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1954. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1954
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This May 10, 1954 Board Assistant Counsel letter answers a sound-recording company's March 31 request about an extra worldwide music royalty on a customer's 16mm motion picture. The PDF does not reproduce the request, recording contract, copyright license, worldwide clearance, discs, pictures, invoices, royalty calculations, payments, returns, audits, assessments, refund claims, appeals, or later outcomes. An undated appended note says sections 6010.6 and 6362.5 amended tax treatment but gives no author, enactment date, statutory text, explanation, or application; CDTFA's current annotation omits that warning. Another taxpayer cannot treat the historical opinion as binding or current and should review those provisions and current sound-recording, motion-picture, copyright-license, fabrication, documentation, and sales-and-use-tax law. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A sound-recording company recorded narration and music onto 16mm educational or travelogue motion pictures. Its standard royalty covered United States non-theatrical use, while one customer requested worldwide music clearance for an additional royalty.

The 1954 opinion treated fabrication or processing of the customer's tangible property as a taxable sale. It reasoned that the expanded right to use the finished picture worldwide made the transferred property more valuable, so the separately stated additional royalty was an integral part of the sale price.

An appended official note says that sections 6010.6 and 6362.5 later amended the application of tax to sound recordings and sound for motion pictures. The source does not date or explain that amendment note.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6010.6 and 6362.5 — identified only in an undated appended note stating that tax treatment was amended; note supplies no author, enactment date, text, explanation, or application to the transaction
  • March 31 letter asking about an additional royalty for worldwide use of music recorded onto a customer's 16mm motion picture — letter and supporting records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • United States non-theatrical music royalty paid to a copyright owner and separately stated additional royalty for worldwide clearance — facts supplied; recording contract, copyright license, clearance, discs, pictures, invoices, royalty calculations, and payments not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Official Annotation 295.0540's music, sound-recording motion picture, sales-price, gross-receipts, and May 10, 1954 summary — annotation omits the March 31 request, 16mm educational or travelogue facts, domestic and worldwide license distinction, copyright-owner payment, fabrication analysis, separately stated charge, undated statutory-amendment note, missing records, and later outcome and supplies no additional license or transaction record
  • Possible recording, license or clearance issuance, picture delivery, royalty payment, return filing, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, statutory-note application, or other later agency action — not supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

295.0540

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

May 10, 1954

Your letter of March 31

You are a sound recording company and record narration and music onto 16mm motion pictures, generally of an educational or travelogue nature. The music is from discs for which you charge a royalty which, in turn, is paid to the copyright owner. The royalty allows the use of the music in the United States for non-theatrical purposes. Recently a customer has requested a clearance for world-wide use of the music for which an additional royalty is charged. You inquire concerning the application of the sales tax to this additional royalty. The fabricating or processing of tangible personal property for a consumer is regarded as a sale and the charges for such fabricating or processing are subject to the tax. The mere transfer of bare legal title to tangible personal property without the right to use that property would be a nullity. A sale of tangible personal property with the right to use in the United States is a sale and subject to the tax. A sale of tangible personal property with the right to use throughout the world is also a sale and is subject to the tax. The measure of tax is higher in the latter case because the right transferred is more valuable. The fact that the additional fee for world-wide use is separately stated does not make it any the less an integral part of the sale itself.

Yours very truly,

Bill Holden
Assistant Counsel
BH:ja
cc: Los Angeles -Auditing
*note: the application of tax to charges for sound recordings and charges for sound for motion pictures is amended. (Section 6010.6 &6362.5)

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1954. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace