What price measured tax when a trailer finance contract showed a fictitious down payment or understated the actual sale?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1954. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A trailer seller sometimes wrote a $1,500 finance contract with a fictitious $500 down payment even though the real cash price was $1,000. With no trade-in, the letter treated $1,000 as the tax measure. But if the seller charged the customer sales-tax reimbursement on $1,500, that higher amount became the seller's tax liability measure.
If the purchaser traded in property as part of the payment, the full $1,500 stated price was taxable. The letter also addressed the reverse manipulation: where a contract showed a $1,000 price and $350 down payment but the seller actually received $850 cash plus a $650 promise, tax applied to the real $1,500 consideration.
The contract labels therefore did not override the payment and reimbursement facts.
Citations and references
- The official letter cites no statute or regulation by number.
- January 8 letter asking about trailer finance contracts that overstated or understated purchase price and down payment — year and copy not provided in the published text
- Trailer sales for stated and actual prices of $1,000 or $1,500, stated or actual down payments of $350, $500, or $850, a $650 payment promise, possible trade-in property, and possible sales-tax reimbursement charged on $1,500 — examples supplied; dates, parties, property details, contract numbers, trade-in values, tax computations, and transaction records not reproduced in the official PDF
- Finance contracts and financing-company transactions showing purchase prices and down payments different from the actual consideration — described but not reproduced in the official PDF
- Official Annotation 295.0360's contract examples, financing purpose, trade-in treatment, stated and actual amounts, and Mar. 12, 1954 date — annotation calls the property a vehicle rather than the source body's trailer and says sales tax rather than the body's sales-tax reimbursement; it omits the Jan. 8 request provenance, absence of cited legal authority, missing contracts and transaction records, printed "paid to your" and spaced "$1,000 .00" forms, and later outcome and supplies no additional sale, financing, or tax record
- Possible completed sale, trade-in valuation, financing approval, reimbursement collection, audit, assessment, refund claim, appeal, or other later agency action — not supplied in the official PDF
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/295-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/295-0360.pdf
Original ruling text
295.0360
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
March 12, 1954
Your letter of January 8
Dear Mr.
You inquire concerning the application of sales tax when you sell a trailer for
$1,000.00 but write a contract showing a purchase price of $1,500.00 with a $500.00 down payment. The $500.00 is never, in fact, paid to your by the purchaser nor is it ever intended that it should be paid. The transaction is handled in this manner for the purpose of obtaining financing from a financing company. If there is no trade-in, the correct measure of tax is $1,000 .00. However, if the customer is charged sales tax reimbursement on $1,500.00, then that $1,500.00 amount becomes the measure of your tax liability to the State. If property is traded in by the purchaser as a part of the payment of the price, the measure of the tax is the full $1,500.00. In some cases, you write down the sales price and at the same time do not show the entire down payment on the contract. For example, upon the sale of a $1,500.00 trailer with an $850.00 down payment, you might write a contract showing a purchase price of $1,000 .00 with a $350.00 down payment. This contract is then financed through a finance company. However, since you have received $850.00 in cash plus the purchaser's promise to pay an additional $650.00, the measure of the tax is the full
$1,500.00.
Yours very truly,
Bill Holden
Assistant Counsel
BH:ja
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1954. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace