How did California tax a $5 baseball card and a $30 player autograph when sold as a package, option, or separate transaction?

Short answer A $35 lump-sum card-and-autograph package was fully taxable, but an optional or separately purchased $30 autograph was not taxed.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 295.0035
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1990-12-05
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A principal tax auditor asking how sales tax applied to three baseball-card autograph arrangements

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1990. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1990
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization senior-tax-counsel memorandum comparing three expressly stated baseball-card and autograph arrangements. The opinion called the issue close and relied on existing annotation analogies. Its result depends on whether the autograph is included in one lump-sum card sale, separately optional from the same vendor, or purchased from a show promoter at another table. Different bundling or agency facts may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Board compared three arrangements involving a baseball card worth $5 and a player autograph priced at $30.

  • If the vendor sold the card and autograph together for one $35 lump sum, the full $35 was taxable.
  • If the vendor sold the card for $5 and offered the autograph as an optional additional $30 service, only the $5 card charge was taxable.
  • If the customer bought the $5 card and then paid a show promoter at another table $30 for the player's autograph, only the card charge was taxable.

The counsel memorandum described the question as close but treated the optional and separate autograph charges more like lettering placed on new vehicles than engraving included in a jewelry sale.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6006(b) (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Annotations 430.0640 and 435.0800 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

To:

Mr. Glenn A. Bystrom
Principal Tax Auditor

From:

David H. Levine
Senior Tax Counsel

Subject:

Autographs on Baseball Cards

295.0035

December 5, 1990

ATSS 485-5550
(916) 445-5550

This is in response to your memorandum dated November 6, 1990. You ask our opinion regarding the application of sales tax in the following situations: "1.

A vendor sells a baseball card (value $5) and the pictured player is present to autograph the card (value $30), for one lump sum price of
$35.

"2.

A vendor sells a baseball card for $5 and as an option, the customer may pay an additional $30 to the vendor to have the player sign the card.

"3.

A vendor sells a baseball card for $5. then the customer takes the card to another table that is run by the show promoter where the player will sign the card for a $30 fee.”

You note that I had discussed this previously with a member of your staff, Geoffrey Lyle, and concluded that the entire $35 in situation 1 is subject to sales tax. You agree with this conclusion. I had concluded that sales tax applies only to the $5 charge for the baseball card under situations 2 and 3. You are troubled by this conclusion because of the similarity of this type of transaction to the transaction discussed in Annotation 435.0800. That annotation states that charges for engraving jewelry are included in gross receipts unless performed long after the original sale. You ask for our further review of my previous conclusions. Although this is a close question, we believe that Annotation 430.0640 (12/4/50) is closer to this transaction than Annotation 435.0800. That annotation states that printing of lettering and signs on new trucks or automobiles is not a sale under section 6006(b). Our

Mr. Glenn A. Bystrom

-2-

December 5, 1990
295.0035

opinion therefore remains that tax does not apply to the $30 charge for the autographs under situations 2 and 3.

DHL:wk

cc:

295.0035.doc

Mr. Donald J. Hennessy
Mr. John Abbott
Mr. Geoffrey Lyle

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1990. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace