What tax consequences arose when a business gave away tax-paid cars to promote another company's products and was reimbursed?

Short answer The source found a taxable promotional use by the business and a taxable sale to the reimbursing company. Consideration could come from that company even though the automobile was transferred to the winning customer.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 280.1160
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1957-08-13
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Board Stockton auditing staff

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1957. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1957
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This Aug. 13, 1957 sales-tax-counsel memorandum addresses tax-paid automobiles awarded to promote another company's petroleum products and reimbursed after title transfer. The PDF does not reproduce the undated-year July 23 correspondence, promotion or reimbursement agreements, chance tickets, customer eligibility or winner records, vehicle orders or invoices, tax-paid proof, pink slips, registration, delivery, reimbursement invoices or payments, books, returns, or tax computations. Its final sentence lacks terminal punctuation; that source form is preserved. CDTFA's current annotation supplies the same general result but no transaction evidence. Another taxpayer should check current prize, promotional use, reimbursement, third-party consideration, title, registration, evidence, and sales-and-use-tax law. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A business distributed chances for free automobiles to customers to promote another company's petroleum products. It bought the cars tax-paid, transferred title to winning ticket holders, and was then reimbursed for the automobile cost by the petroleum company.

The memorandum treated the business's use of the cars to promote sales as a taxable use. It also treated the transfer and reimbursement arrangement as a taxable sale by the prize-awarding business to the petroleum company.

For sales-tax purposes, the source said it did not matter that consideration came from someone other than the person who received the tangible personal property.

Citations and references

  • The source memorandum cites no statute or regulation by number.
  • July 23 Stockton correspondence, tax-paid automobile purchases, customer chance distribution, petroleum-product promotion, winner selection, title transfer, and petroleum-company cost reimbursement — facts supplied; correspondence, promotion and reimbursement agreements, tickets, customer eligibility and winner records, vehicle orders and invoices, tax-paid proof, titles, registration, delivery, reimbursement invoices and payments, books, returns, and tax computations not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Official Annotation 280.1160's free chances, tax-paid purchase, later reimbursement, promotional use, third-party consideration, and taxable-sale summary — annotation supplies no additional agreement, vehicle, winner, title, reimbursement, or implementation record
  • Possible later vehicle transfer, reimbursement, return filing, audit, assessment, payment, refund claim, appeal, or other agency action — not supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

280.1160
Sacramento
August 13, 1957

To:

Stockton – Auditing (LFG)

From:

Headquarters – Sales Tax Counsel (JJD)

Subject:

The P--- P--- Company
P.O. Box XXX
---

Account K-X-XXXXX
Yours of July 23

As we understand the facts, the P--- P--- Co., Inc., distributes chances on a free automobile to its customers as a means of furthering the sales of C--- O--- Co. P---. The automobiles which are given away are purchased by P--- P--- on a tax-paid basis. Following the signing over of the pink slip to the holder of the lucky ticket, C--- reimbursed P--- P--- for the cost of the automobile. It is our opinion that P--- P--- Co., Inc. makes a taxable use of the automobiles in furthering their sales of petroleum products. We are of the further opinion that the transfer of the automobiles to the holder of the winning ticket in return for reimbursement paid by C--- O--- Co. would result in a taxable sale being made by P--- P--- to C--- O--- Co. For sales tax purposes it is of no consequence that a seller receives consideration from a person other than the person to whom he transfers the tangible personal property

James J. Delaney

JJD:cl

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1957. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace